Friday, January 25, 2019

Friendly meeting Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping in Beijing





From January 7 to 10, a DPRK party and government delegation led by the Chairman of the Workers Party of Korea, the Chairman of the DPRK State Council, the Supreme Commander of the Korean People’s Army, Comrade Kim Jong-un, paid a visit to Beijing in connection with the DPRK and the PRC and the situation on the Korean Peninsula. The Korean delegation was warmly welcomed by Comrade Xi Jinping and the leading comrades of the PRC.

During the extensive negotiations, it was stated that the WPK and the Korean government will continue, as in the past, to rally together with the Chinese side and make new efforts to further strengthen and develop Korean-Chinese relations, inheriting the tradition of close cooperation between the two parties, the two countries. For his part, Comrade. Xi Jinping said that he pays great attention to Sino-Korean friendly relations and has a deep confidence in the party and the people of Korea.

Both sides exchanged in-depth views on international and regional issues of mutual interest. Comrade Kim Jong-un invited Comrade Xi Jinping to pay a friendly visit to Pyongyang, which was gratefully accepted.

Information Center of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

STATEMENT of public organizations of Belarus in connection with the prosecution of Algirdas Paleckis in the Republic of Lithuania





In recent days, world media have spread the information that the leader of the Lithuanian Socialist Front, Algirdas Paleckis, has been in a Lithuanian prison for more than two months.

The Lithuanian Themis re-opened the "witch hunt", announcing the disclosure of a "network of Russian spies." Algirdas Paleckis, who has been detained in prison since October 2018, and another half dozen people, citizens of Lithuania and Russia, are accused of spying for Russia.

As is known, it is not the first time that Lithuanian law enforcement agencies have been prosecuting the well-known Lithuanian political figure A. Paleckis, who openly voiced his left-wing anti-fascist position regarding the events taking place in the republic. In 2009, A. Paleckis was accused of organizing a rally illegally, but was acquitted. In 2011, A. Paleckis was charged in connection with his statement on the air of the events of January 1991 in Vilnius. Then the fighter for the truthful coverage of the events, after which anti-Soviet hysteria began in Lithuania, hastened the coup d'état in the republic, clearly named the perpetrators of the provocation, saying: "They fired at their own people." The court of first instance acquitted A. Paleckis, but then he was awarded a large fine. This time, the political intelligence bodies of the Lithuanian state, where the pro-fascist organizations operate openly and without hindrance, decided to hide the leader of the Lithuanian left behind the prison bars more fundamentally.

Now A. Paleckis is charged with the “Case of espionage”, which is the same as the previous “cases”, “sewn with white threads”. However, the real reason for the prosecution of A. Paleckis is not his participation in “espionage in favor of Russia”, but his firm anti-fascist position and appearances condemning NATO. Even Lithuanian political scientist Thomas Janelyunas admitted that the Socialist Front, which is headed by A. Paleckis, never openly called for the overthrow of power. However, antipathy towardsit was openly expressed. “They said that the current government, no matter what party led it, is undemocratic, that the collapse of the USSR was a mistake, and membership in the EU and NATO was contrary to the interests of Lithuania.”

The above information suggests that the current actions of Lithuanian law enforcement agencies resemble the obscurantism of the punitive organs of dictatorial regimes performed in the worst traditions of McCarthyism, Pinochet's secret police and the Gestapo. Ideological intolerance, the search for “scapegoats” among dissidents and other manifestations of the weakness of the current Lithuanian regime resulted in espionage and a fabricated criminal case against Lithuanian anti-fascist oppositionists.

We, representatives of public organizations of Belarus, demand from the leadership of the Republic of Lithuania an immediate cessation of political repression, the release of prisoners of conscience and political prisoners, among them Algirdas Paleckis, a prominent anti-fascist, defender of rights and spokesman for the legitimate interests of the Lithuanian people.

We are deeply convinced that in the current difficult times, the Lithuanian special services spent taxpayers' money to the detriment of the interests of the Lithuanian people, and the officials who gave the corresponding criminal orders discredited the Lithuanian state.

We are convinced that the Republic of Lithuania will be held as a democratic state only when law enforcement agencies serve the whole people, when human rights and civil liberties are protected, when pluralism becomes the norm, and the dark times of terror against dissidents will fade away.


Leaders of Belarusian public associations and organizations:

V.B. Zelikov, Chairman of the Republican Civil Committee of the Patriotic Public Association "Fatherland";

V.V. Draco, Chairman of the Republican Council of the public association "For Democracy, Social Progress and Justice", deputy of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus I

L.E. Shkolnikov Secretary-Coordinator of the Republican public association "For the Union and the Communist Party of the Union";

G.I. Simanovsky, Secretary of the Coordination Council of the Left-Patriotic Organizations of Belarus "Unity";

V.V. Saevich, Chairman of the Council of the Minsk City Public Organization “New Economy”;

V.M. Ryzhenkov, Chairman, Our History Information and Educational Institution

Minsk, 01/14/2019

No negotiations on the transfer of Southern Kuriles to Japan!


Statement of the Secretariat of the CC AUCPB

The leadership of the Russian Federation has started the next negotiations with Japan on the ownership of the four southern Kuril Islands - Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan and Habomai and declared its readiness to transfer the islands of Shikotan and Habomai to Japan.

At a meeting in Singapore on November 14, 2018, Russian President Putin and Japanese Prime Minister Abe agreed to step up Russian-Japanese negotiations on a peace treaty based on a joint declaration of October 19, 1956.

“... We resumed dialogue with our Japanese partners on the basis of the 1956 declaration. It says that the Soviet Union is ready to transfer the two southern islands of Japan after signing a peace treaty ”(Shikotan and Habomai - our note), Putin said at a press conference following the talks in Singapore on November 15, 2018.

As follows from the Singapore statement by the President of the Russian Federation Putin, the leadership of the Russian Federation intends to transfer to Japan the Small Kuril ridge (Shikotan and Habomai), which consists of more than 20 islands and small archipelagoes.

Japan insists on the transfer to it of all four islands of the southern Kuril ridge - all at once or according to the formula “two plus alpha”, that is, it receives the islands of Shikotan and Habomai and at the same time conducts negotiations on Kunashir and Iturup. In return for the southern Kuriles, the Japanese "promise" that Russian citizens "may remain" on the islands after their transfer under the sovereignty of Japan, that Japan "will refuse" the requirement of Russia to pay "compensation" to Japan and Japanese citizens for the "post-war occupation of the islands" and t .P.

Thus, there is a cynical bargaining of national interests and the security of Russia.

The current "rulers" of Russia, beginning with Gorbachev and up to Putin, have more than once given up the territory of Russia, which has both economic and military-strategic importance, to foreign states. In 1990, Gorbachev and Shevardnadze transferred to the US 46.3 thousand square kilometers of territory in the Bering Sea. Russia has not forgotten that Putin’s signature is on the 2004 documents on the transfer of islands to China along the Amur River with a total area of ​​337 square kilometers, including the entire Tarabarov and half of the Big Ussuri Island in the confluence of the Amur and Ussuri rivers, which brought the border closer to the largest city of the Far East - Khabarovsk. In 2011, Medvedev and Putin presented Norway (a NATO country) with a huge territory in the Barents Sea covering an area of ​​90 thousand square kilometers with rich oil, gas and fish resources.

What is this Soviet-Japanese declaration of October 19, 1956? This declaration was adopted by the voluntarist decision of Khrushchev. Article 9 of the Declaration stated that "the USSR, meeting the wishes of Japan and taking into account the interests of the Japanese state, agrees to the transfer of the Habomai Islands and Shikotan Islands to Japan, however, that the actual transfer of these islands to Japan will be made after the conclusion of a peace treaty."

But in 1960, the Soviet government in connection with the conclusion of the new Japanese-American military treaty, the point directed against the USSR and the PRC, on the basis of which the US military bases in Japan still exist have in effect, annulled these promises. It was reasonably stated that any territorial concessions to Japan would contribute to the expansion of the territory used by foreign troops, and that the issue of a territorial settlement with Japan was already resolved by the relevant international agreements that must be respected.

It is also important that the signing of the Khrushchev Declaration of 1956 and its ratification by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR were carried out in violation of the Constitutions of the USSR of 1936 (Art. 18) and the RSFSR of 1937 (Art. 16), since the consent of the RSFSR was required change its territory, which was not received.



The current leadership of the Russian Federation continues to frustrate the Japanese revenge-seekers.

On January 14th of this year, the first round of Russian-Japanese talks was held at the level of the foreign ministers of Russia and Japan. President Vladimir Putin will hold talks with Prime Minister Abe of Japan on January 22, who will arrive on a working visit to Russia at the invitation of Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin press service reports.

According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, the negotiations at the level of foreign ministers were “devoted to fulfilling the instructions of the President of Russia V.V. Putin and the Prime Minister of Japan, S. Abe, on the need to speed up work on a peace treaty on the basis of the Soviet-Japanese Declaration of 1956."

“... The current leaders of Japan and Russia, we believe, are determined to draw a line under this (“ territorial ”- our comment) question through our own efforts. The negotiations in Moscow were based precisely on this, ”commented the press service of the Japanese Foreign Ministry.

“Today we confirmed our readiness to work on the basis of the 1956 Declaration.” The decision of the “peace treaty” should be based on “the recognition by our Japanese neighbors of the results of the Second World War in full, including Russia's sovereignty over the South Kuril Islands,” said Russian Foreign Minister S.V. Lavrov.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation obviously does not get along with logic. Isn't the transfer of the Southern Kuriles to Japan a review of the outcome of the Second World War and the non-recognition of Russia's sovereignty over them? Why, then, these “talks”? .. The Russian Foreign Ministry suffices to declare that the Kuril Islands are Russian territory and there is nothing to discuss here.

All these negotiations mean nothing more than a review of the outcome of the Second World War, the rejection of its ancestral territories from Russia, the satisfaction of Japan’s territorial claims on Russian lands, and the betrayal of the country's national interests.

There is no "territorial problem" of the "northern territories", as Japan insists on, considering them to be "their own", does not exist. The South Kuril Islands are originally Russian lands and, as a result of the Second World War, they finally became part of the USSR together with the Northern Kuriles and Southern Sakhalin.

The Kuril Islands were first discovered and taken by the Russians even before the Japanese appeared on them and were incorporated into the Russian Empire in the second half of the 18th century. Japanese expansion in the southern Kuriles intensified since the beginning of the XIX century. Using the plight of Russia during the Crimean War (1853–1856) and threatening with war, Japan achieved the exclusion of the islands of Habomai, Shikotan, Kunashir and Iturup from Russia (Simodsk treatise from 1855). In 1875, tsarist diplomacy caused great damage to the interests of Russia, transferring all the Kuril Islands to Japan in exchange for the formal recognition of Russia's rights to Sakhalin, which in fact belonged to it.

As a result of the Japanese aggression during the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905, South Sakhalin was rejected from Russia.

Thus, the Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin passed from Russia to Japan as a result of Japanese expansion and aggression and are not originally Japanese territories.

The Kuril Islands are of strategic importance for the security of Russia, especially against the background of the growing aggressiveness of the United States, using Japan as a military-strategic base in the Asia-Pacific region. Japan has military bases, elements of a global missile defense system and US nuclear weapons.

The Kuril Islands provide Russia with direct access to the Pacific Ocean and serve as the basis for the country's defense against external aggression. Modern Russian anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems are deployed on the islands themselves.

Most interested in the Japanese-Russian deal are the United States of America, dreaming about plans to destroy Russia. Currently, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is the inland sea of ​​Russia. The situation will radically change when Japan receives the South Kuril Islands: our Pacific Fleet will be locked up in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk and will be denied free access to the world's oceans.

The commander of US troops in Japan, Lieutenant-General Jeri Martinez, frankly stated that "the States have no plans to deploy armed forces in the Kuril Islands - AT THIS TIME." The question of whether such plans will appear in the United States in the future, you can not even ask.

Japan is in orbit of US influence, and all decisions will be made by Washington.

We must not forget the lessons of history. During the Second World War, the Kuril Islands served as the basis of Japanese aggression. According to the plans of the Japanese command, the Japanese armed forces stationed on South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands were to participate in the seizure of North Sakhalin, Primorye and Kamchatka. During the events at Lake Hassan (1938) and at Khalkhin Gol (1939), these troops were on high alert.

All this was taken into account when adopting I.V. Stalin's decision to return the Kurils to the USSR. The agreement on this was reached at the Yalta Conference (February, 1944) of the leaders of the three powers - the USSR, the USA and Great Britain and enshrined in the Yalta Agreement on the Far East.

The Potsdam Declaration of the USA, Great Britain, and the PRC (July, 1945), to which the USSR joined on August 8, 1945, deprived Japan of its sovereignty over any territory outside the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku.

On September 2, Japan signed on the terms of the Yalta Agreement and the Potsdam Declaration an act of unconditional surrender. The Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin were returned to the USSR (South-Sakhalin Oblast of the RSFSR).

 In his address to the people on September 2, 1945, Stalin emphasized that “South Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands will withdraw to the Soviet Union and from now on they will serve not as a means of separating the Soviet Union from the ocean and as the base of the Japanese attack on our Far East, but as a direct connection of the Soviet Union with the ocean and the base of our country's defense against Japanese aggression. "

Thus, as a result of the defeat of militarist Japan, Russia regained what it had rejected, and this was reinforced by international legal agreements following the Second World War.

According to a survey, the citizens of Russia do not support the transfer of the Kuril Islands to Japan. On the island of Shikotan, there are 2.5 thousand Russians, on the island of Kunashir - about 8 thousand, on the island of Iturup - 1.8 thousand. According to the national composition, the majority of Russians live. The Japanese left the Kuril Islands in 1945

Russia's loss of the Kuril Islands will also lead to economic losses - a 200-mile zone, where there are rich fish reserves and minerals necessary for the industry. The promises of official Tokyo to compensate Russia's economic losses for the sake of concluding a “peace treaty” will not lead to anything good. We also cannot fail to take into account the statement of the head of the Japanese government about the preservation of sanctions against Russia "in connection with the problems of Ukraine and Crimea"

The leadership of the Russian Federation not only squanders Russian territory, but betrays and gives up its own citizens. All this is being done in the class interests of the Russian oligarchy, which hopes through a “territorial deal” to bargain for itself a more advantageous political and economic “collaboration” with Japan.

We support the protests of the Russian patriots that have swept the country against the transfer of the Russian Kuriles to Japan.

As is known, the power of a state is determined not only by the strength of its armed forces, but also by its economic potential. After the counter-revolutionary coup as a result of Russia's transition to capitalist rails, according to the latest data in terms of GDP, the economy of the Russian state turned out to be relegated to 11th place in the world. Its growth rates are still lagging behind the growth rates of our political opponents, and the current capitalist Russian economy has no prospects for improving the situation. Western countries, including Japan, have felt this, hence their increased audacity to put pressure on Russia. Therefore, we believe that only the revival of socialism and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics will provide Russia with guaranteed sovereignty and independence.

We demand an immediate end to any negotiations on the transfer of a part of the southern Kuril Ridge to Japan.

We demand an end to the “joint economic activity” of Japan in the South Kuril Islands.

We demand a denunciaion of the legislative level the Soviet-Japanese declaration of October 19, 1956.

We demand to restore the official celebration of September 3 - Victory Day over militarist Japan.

01.19.2019

Friday, January 18, 2019

January 1 - 100th anniversary (1919) of the formation of the Byelorussian SSR

Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Belarus



and the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic



After the liberation of Belarus from the German occupiers and the restoration of Soviet power, there was a real opportunity to exercise the right of the Belarusian people to form their national statehood on the basis of the Soviet system. Having given all the peoples of Russia the opportunity to decide the question of the form of the state system, the Communist Party and its leader V.I. Lenin recommended them to choose one that would fully meet the interests of the broadest masses of working people, the tasks of socialist construction.

The working people of Belarus, led by the Bolsheviks, strongly opposed the attempts of local bourgeois nationalists to tear off Belarus from Soviet Russia. The workers spoke in favor of strengthening the union with the fraternal Russian people, for the formation of the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic as part of the Soviet state.

The Central Committee of the RCP (b), V.I. Lenin paid great attention to issues of the state structure of Belarus, the creation of the Communist Party of Belarus. With the participation of V.I. Lenin's question about the creation of the BSSR and the CP (b) B was raised and discussed in the Central Committee of the RCP (b). At the initiative of the Central Committee of the RCP (B.) In Moscow, talks and meetings of members of the Central Committee and the Soviet Government with leading party and Soviet workers of Belarus were held. Lenin gave valuable advice to his Belarusian comrades on issues of party, Soviet and economic construction. On behalf of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) and the Soviet Government, the National Commissariat for Nationalities Affairs (Narkomnats), which was headed by I.V. Stalin. The Belarusian National Commissariat established under the People's Commissariat actively participated in this work.

In response to the wishes of the Belarusian people, the Central Committee of the RCP (B.) At the end of December 1918 decided to form the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic. This decision was of great importance for the formation of the CP (B) of Belarus.

On December 25, a meeting was held in the Narkomnats with the responsible employees of Belnatskom, members of the Central Bureau of the Belarusian Communist sections and the committee of the Moscow Belarusian section of the RCP (B). The issues of practical implementation of the decision of the RCP (b) on the establishment of the BSSR were discussed. On December 27, in the Narkomnat, with the participation of senior officials of the North-Western Regional Committee of the RCP (B.), Issues on the territory of the republic, the structure and composition of its government were discussed, and a draft manifesto on the proclamation of the BSSR was prepared.

To discuss the issue of the formation of the BSSR and KP (b) B, the North-Western Regional Committee of the RCP (B) decided to convene the next North-West Conference of the RCP (B), which opened on December 30, 1918 in Smolensk. It was attended by 206 delegates representing 17771 communists from party organizations in the Minsk, Mogilyov, Vitebsk, Smolensk, parts of the Chernihiv and Vilna provinces. The conference discussed a report on the current moment, which was delivered by the Chairman of the North-Western Regional Committee of the RCP (b) A.F. Myasnikov, the report of the regional committee of the RCP (b), reports on the situation on the ground, resolved organizational issues. At the suggestion of A.F. Myasnikov adopted a decision on the proclamation of the Western Commune by the Belarusian Soviet Republic. All the communist organizations of Belarus were represented at the conference, and on this basis, declared itself the First Congress of the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of Belarus.

The conference sent telegrams from the Central Committee of the RCP (B.) And the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR. The VI North-Western Regional Conference of the RCP (b), was noted in a telegram to the Central Committee of the RCP (b), by deciding to separate Belarus into an independent worker-peasant Soviet Republic, proclaims itself the I Congress of the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of the Belarusian Republic and confirms the unbreakable ideological, tactical and organizational relationship with the Russian Communist Party, which was created over the long years of working together. In a telegram to the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR, it was stated that by proclaiming an independent Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic, the Belarusian people "were and will forever remain inseparably linked by a commonality of their interests with all the peoples of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic."

The I Congress of the CP (b) B adopted a resolution on the borders of Belarus. In accordance with it, it consisted of the following provinces: Minsk, Smolensk, Mogilev, Vitebsk, Grodno, with parts of the adjacent provinces of the neighboring provinces populated mainly by Belarusians.

The congress elected the governing body of the CP (b) - the Central Bureau of the CP (b) B. On December 31, its first meeting was held. The Presidium of the CP (b) B Central Committee was elected as part of A.F. Myasnikov (chairman), M.I. Kalmanovich and V.G. Knorin The CP (B) B Congress adopted the “Provision on Party Organizations”, which determined the structure and functions of the Central Bureau, provincial and district party committees, volost and rural party cells. The situation fully complied with the requirements of the Charter of the RCP (b), based on the principles of democratic centralism. Completing the work, the First Congress of the CP (B) B appealed to the workers, farm laborers, peasants and soldiers of the Red Army to rally closer around the Communist Party to fight for the consolidation of Soviet power, for socialism. On December 31, the Provisional Workers 'and Peasants' Government of Belarus, headed by D.F. Zhilunovych. On January 1, 1919, it promulgated the Manifesto on the proclamation of the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic. It said: "From today, the Belarusian Soviet Republic becomes a republic of the working people — the workers, the peasant poor, and the Red Army men of Belarus." The day of the publication of the Manifesto was the birthday of the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic. For the first time in a long history, thanks to the victory of the Great October Socialist Revolution and the implementation of the Leninist national policy, the Belarusian people gained their freedom, independence and national statehood.

The news of the First Congress of the Communist Party of Belarus and the proclamation of the Byelorussian SSR quickly spread throughout Belarus. In the greetings of the Communist Party and the Provisional Workers 'and Peasants' Government of Belarus, the working people of the republic expressed their readiness to fully contribute to the strengthening of Soviet power.

During the preparation for the proclamation of the BSSR and the Communist Party of Belarus, much work was done to create Komsomol organizations. An exceptionally important role in it belonged to the First Congress of the RKSM (October 29, 1919), whose decisions were aimed at strengthening organizational and political education work among working youth, at attracting it to socialist construction. The first Komsomol organization in Belarus was established on November 13, 1918 in Vitebsk. By the end of the year, there were 18 Komsomol organizations in Vitebsk province (in Orsha, Polotsk, Driss and other district centers). In December 1918, Komsomol organizations were established in Minsk, Mogilev, Bobruisk, and Mozyr. Under the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, the Komsomol organizations of Belarus grew stronger politically and organizationally, grew qualitatively, increasingly attracting working youth to actively participate in socialist construction.

By January 8, 1919, the Provisional Workers' and Peasants Soviet Government moved from Smolensk to Minsk and began to form the central state apparatus of the republic. His commissariats were created on the basis of the Obliskzap departments. A government presidium of D.F. was elected. Zhilunovich, A.F. Myasnikova, M.I. Kalmanovich.

January 17 The Provisional Workers 'and Peasants' Soviet Government of Belarus announced the upcoming convocation of the All-Belarusian Congress of Soviets. It began its activities in extremely difficult political and economic conditions. The land of Belarus liberated from the German invaders was dominated by economic ruin and famine. The aggressive circles of bourgeois-landlord Poland threatened with war the young Republic of Soviets. Pilsudski’s anti-people government did not respond to the repeated proposals of the Soviet government to resolve disputed issues peacefully.

In this situation, the Provisional Workers 'and Peasants' Soviet Government of Belarus paid much attention to the issues of the defense of the republic. On January 21, 1919, the Military Revolutionary Council headed by the Chairman of the Main Directorate of the CP (b) B A.F. Myasnikov. On the same day, a decree was adopted on universal military training and the mobilization of workers. The Minsk Military Commissariat began to form working groups and train them in military affairs. The CB of the CP (B) B, the BSSR government took measures to improve the work of enterprises and reduce unemployment, improve the material conditions of workers, paid much attention to the issues of social security of war and labor disabled, helping families of Red Army men, organizing medical assistance to working people.

In December 1918 - January 1919, volost, district and provincial councils of Soviets were held in Belarus. They resolved issues of economic and cultural construction, elected the executive committees of the Soviets and delegates to the First All-Belarusian Congress of Soviets. The elections to the Soviets contributed to the strengthening of the organs of state power, for they were mainly elected workers and poor peasants. In December 1918 - January 1919, a unified system of state power was created in Belarus. During this period, party organizations were also formed in the territory of Minsk province liberated from German occupiers.

The 2nd All-Belarusian Congress of Workers', Peasants' and Red Army Deputies' Councils took place on February 2–3, 1919 in Minsk. On behalf of the Central Committee of the Party and the Central Executive Committee, Chairman of the All-Russian Executive Committee Ya.M. Sverdlov and the representative of the workers of the Soviet Lithuania - Chairman of the Government of the Lithuanian SSR V.S. Mitskyavichus-Kapsukas. The congress was attended by 230 delegates with a decisive vote. Of these, 213 were members of the party, 17 - sympathizers. They represented 5,750,000 working people in the Minsk, Vilna, Grodno, Smolensk and Mogilyov provinces.

The congress discussed the following questions: about the current moment; Report of the Provisional Workers' and Peasants Soviet Government of Belarus; about the borders of Soviet Belorussia; about the attitude to the Soviet republics; on the Constitution of the Byelorussian SSR; election of the CEC of the BSSR.

Y.M. Sverdlov praised the courage and heroism of the working people of Belarus in the fight against the German occupiers. He announced the decisions of the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee "On the recognition of the independence of the BSSR." Recognizing the independence of Belarus, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee declared its readiness "to render all possible assistance and support to the working masses of Belarus in their struggle against domination, exploitation and oppression and in protecting their freedom and independence from attempts at foreign conquest."

Delegates of the congress defined their attitude to the Russian people in the “Declaration on the Establishment of a Federal Relationship between the BSSR and the RSFSR”. It said that Sovetskaya Belorussia recognized the need to establish close economic and political ties with its elder brother, the RSFSR. A representative of the Narkomnats, who was present at the 1st All-Belarusian Congress of Soviets, telegraphed to the Narkomnats: “On the sidelines of the congress, the issue of the formation of the republic is vividly discussed. One tendency is to stay with the RSFSR. ”

The First All-Belarusian Congress of Soviets defined the territory of the BSSR as part of the Minsk and Grodno provinces. In accordance with the decisions of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) and the Central Committee of the Communist Party (b) B and the statements of representatives of the Vitebsk, Mogilyov and Smolensk provinces on leaving these provinces as part of the RSFSR, the congress decided not to include the Vitebsk, Mogilyov and Smolensk provinces in the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic .

The First All-Belarusian Congress of Soviets adopted the Constitution of the BSSR - the main law of the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic. A model for it was the Constitution of the RSFSR in 1918.

In accordance with it, the BSSR Constitution enshrined in law the conquest of the socialist revolution — the dictatorship of the proletariat; defined its main tasks — the transition from capitalism to socialism, the elimination of the division of society into hostile classes, the abolition of the exploitation of man by man, the abolition of private ownership of land, forests, mineral resources and water, means of production, turning them into national wealth.

Labor for the benefit of building socialism was recognized as the most important duty of all citizens of the republic. The Constitution of the BSSR legalized the equality of citizens regardless of their nationality and race, the right to hold meetings and organize unions, freedom of speech, free education. These rights were guaranteed only by the workers. They did not apply to persons belonging to the class of exploiters.

In accordance with the Constitution of the BSSR, the supreme power in the republic belonged to the Congress of Soviets. In the period between congresses, it was carried out by the Central Executive Committee of the BSSR, which is responsible to the All-Belarusian Congress of Soviets. The CEC, elected at the congress, included 50 people - 45 communists, the remaining 5 - representatives of other parties. The I All-Belarusian Congress approved the emblem and flag of the Belarusian BSSR.

V.B. Zelikov

Secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

Over Venezuela, the clouds are gathering






After losing a number of its strategic positions in Latin America, Hugo Chávez coming to power in Venezuela and the formation of the ALBA bloc around Venezuela, the tip of which was directed against US imperialism, with the participation of a number of other progressive Latin American states, this imperial key regions of the world.

Hugo Chavez was most hated by the US imperialists because he declared a struggle for national independence and for socialism and established a close friendship with socialist Cuba, rallied the anti-American bloc in the underbelly of the United States.

On May 20, 2018, Hugo Chávez’s successor as president, Nicolas Maduro, was elected for a second presidential term, and more than 67% of voters who took part in the vote voted for him. The new presidential term Maduro began on January 10 - until 2025. In this regard, the United States stepped up subversive activities in Venezuela in order to overthrow the Chavist regime.

Not only funds from the arsenal of “color revolutions” that the USA has spent in the countries of the Middle East and in Ukraine are involved. The United States has formed a political anti-havoc bloc "The Group of Lima" from among a number of Latin American countries. On 4 January, the countries of the “Group of Lima” demanded that Maduro give up his presidential powers and transfer power to the opposition parliament, which is guided by the United States, before the new presidential elections.

“A coup d'état, organized from Washington, through the Lima Group, is being carried out against the constitutional government I head,” President Maduro said at a press conference on January 9.

Imperialism provokes a diplomatic blockade of Venezuela. A number of Latin American countries and even friendly Venezuela Ecuador refused to participate in the inauguration of Nicolas Maduro on January 10 (held in the Supreme Court, and not in the National Assembly, controlled by the opposition). The European Union, following the shouting of the United States, refused to send representatives to the inauguration.

After the inauguration, Paraguay broke off diplomatic relations with Venezuela. The government of Peru has withdrawn for consultations the temporary charge d'affaires in Venezuela. Most members of the Organization of American States (OAS), controlled by the United States, did not recognize the new presidential term Maduro. The United States announced increased pressure on Venezuela.

The Bolivarian Republic breaks blockade. Bolivian President Evo Morales and Cuban leader Miguel Díaz-Canel, leaders of El Salvador and Nicaragua, Sánchez Séren and Daniel Ortega personally attended the inauguration. Representatives for the inauguration sent Russia, China and several other states.

Earlier, the US special services attempted to eliminate the Venezuelan leader in order to achieve their revanchist goals.

In early August 2017, an attempt was made on Maduro during a parade in Caracas. To the podium, where he was, were sent drones with explosives. The attempt was organized by the opposition with the support of the United States and former Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos. Prior to this, the Venezuelan authorities announced the disclosure of numerous conspiracies that were prepared against the country's leadership. In the summer of 2017, 14 soldiers were arrested in Venezuela on charges of preparing a mutiny. In April 2016, President Maduro announced plans to kill him, hatched by right-wing forces through training militants in the paramilitary camps in the state of Miranda.

Along with the activization of the US-oriented and supported by the local oligarchy, the anti-Communist opposition that seized power in parliament (the National Assembly, which is outlawed, headed by Juan Guayido (Guaydo), according to Maduro, “puppet, US intelligence "; instead, the National Constituent Assembly was created in the Bolivarian Republic), US intelligence agencies are actively working on a military coup scenario, a plan to eliminate the president and his subordinates to-military structures.

According to Maduro, not far from the border with Venezuela, Colombia is currently preparing a group of more than 730 mercenaries who can start fighting at any moment to commit provocations. The purpose of their actions is to neutralize a number of military bases in Venezuela. The authorities of Colombia have made available to the participants of the plan an air force base on their territory.

Maduro has already said that Venezuela will respond to such actions by the United States with decisive diplomatic and military measures.

Over Venezuela, the clouds are gathering. Imperialism is straining to overthrow the Chavistic regime at all costs.

Venezuela fights for its political independence. Progressive people of the planet support it in this fair struggle.

But history teaches that the achievement of such independence is inextricably linked with the struggle of the working masses for the abolition of capitalism, for the transfer of power into the hands of the working people. China, Cuba, Vietnam and a number of other countries that won true independence in the 20th century achieved this through the organization and implementation of a socialist revolution. On the other hand, many countries, although they formally gained independence, remained dependent on the advanced imperialist powers, while the working people still groan under the yoke of their own and foreign bourgeoisie. The Venezuelan bourgeoisie is afraid of a truly national revolution, is closely associated with US imperialism and will go to any betrayal of the motherland in order to preserve its capital.

Would Cuba be an island of freedom if Fidel Castro had not announced the transition to a socialist revolution?

And the military coup in Chile under El Salvador Allende? Ignoring the laws of class struggle is cruelly avenging itself.

A revolution is only worth something if it can defend itself, said Lenin.

Socialism or death! - such is the slogan of revolutionary Cuba, the first to raise the banner of socialism in the countries of Latin America, which today is an example for the countries of Latin America fighting for their national freedom.

A.V. Denisyuk


ON THE CENTURY SINCE THE LIBKNECHT AND LUXEMBUR KILLING


One hundred years ago, on January 15, 1919, two great German revolutionaries — Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg the leaders of the communist forces in the German Revolution of 1918-1919, were killed by the criminal pro-fascist forces.






When World War I began, Karl Liebknecht was the only one who voted in the Reichstag against the approval of a military loan. And on May 1, 1916 r. Liebknecht began his speech during a demonstration at Potsdamer Platz in Berlin with the words: “Down with the war! Down with the government"! No further information was given to him. The police seized him and took him away. He disappeared behind the prison walls for two and a half years. When, on October 23, 1918, Karl Liebknecht was released from prison, for the whole of Germany and far beyond its borders, he was the personification of protest against the war, the personification of the Revolution. On December 30, 1918, Liebknecht and the Union of Spartak headed by him withdrew from the Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany and founded the German Communist Party (KKE).

Rosa Luxemburg was released from prison only on November 9, 1918. Almost the entire war she was behind bars: first a year on the political verdict made before the war, and then two and a half years as a “potentially dangerous person for the state”. These years she used to write works devoted to the criticism of German Social Democracy and the lessons of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. Together with Karl Liebknecht, Rosa Luxemburg founded the Communist Party of Germany, drafted her program, and acted with editorial articles in the CNG newspaper Rote Fahne.

Now the two of them remained to live a little more than two months, the two months during which the revolution in Germany broke out and was wrecked. Everyone knew they were being hunted. The bourgeoisie howled, demanding that they be tracked down, seized, torn to shreds. Scheidemann promised one hundred thousand marks to the one who delivered them alive or dead. Two days before the Forverts murder, the Social Democrats newspaper published a poem that ended with a frank call for the murder of Karl and Rosa: “The dead lie a hundred in a row, but Karl is not there! No Rose with the company!

When the government on January 4, 1919 dismissed Berlin policeman Emil Eichhorn, this was the occasion for an uprising. Hundreds of thousands of Berlin workers in protest on January 5, 1919 took to the streets. In the evening they declared the government deposed. The Red Army was to be headed by Karl Liebknecht. The government decided to suppress the uprising. But who will take on this mission? The deputy of the Reichstag and the editor of the Social-Democratic Party newspaper Gustav Noske called. In his youth, Noske mastered the craft of the basketkeeper, at the age of sixteen he joined the Social Democrats. “One of us must finally take on the role of a bloody suppressor. I am not afraid of responsibility, ”Noske said coldly. The troops on January 12 launched artillery, machine guns and captured Berlin. As a reward for the pacification of Berlin, Gustav Noske was appointed Minister of War and received a nickname “Bloody Dog Noske” in history.

They were looking for popular leaders of the left Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. Karl and Rosa were captured on Wednesday, January 15, at twenty-one and thirty minutes by young men from the Reichstag Social Democratic regiment, who took the prisoners to the Eden Hotel in the western part of Berlin and handed them over to the headquarters of the Guards Cavalry Rifle Division, headed by the captain Pabst, the right hand sock. Karl and Rosa spent a little time in Eden, then they were told that they were being transferred to the Moabit prison.

First brought Liebknecht. He was accompanied by future Nazis - Captain - Lieutenant Pflugk - Gartnung and Ober - Lieutenant Vogel. At the time when Liebknecht was being led to the car, Ranger ranger approached him, as he had been ordered by Pabst, and struck several blows to the head with a rifle butt.  Liebknecht was dragged into a car that headed for the Tiergarten. In the middle of the park, the car stopped allegedly due to a breakdown. Liebknecht was told to go out and go ahead. As soon as he walked a few steps, his face accompanied him with shots in the back at close range, he was killed. Liebknecht’s body was taken to an ambulance station located nearby and surrendered as the body of an “unknown”.

Only ten minutes elapsed between the departure of Liebknecht and his murderers from the Hotel Eden and the delivery of the dead body to the ambulance station. At twenty-three hours and twenty minutes Pabst had already received a report that the work was done. Twenty minutes after that, he gave Rosa Luxemburg to Vogel. When Rosa, who was led by the director of the hotel and Vogel, was going down the stairs, the same Runge ran up to her and hit her on the head with the same butt. Rose fainted. She was dragged down by her and thrown into a car. As soon as the car started, Vogel and Lieutenant Krul shot Rosa. The car stopped at the canal between the Cornelius Bridge and the Liechtenstein Bridge. Rosa's body was carried to the pavement, wrapped with wire, attached a load and thrown into the canal. It was discovered only a few months later.

The true reason for the murder was without a doubt that Liebknecht and Luxembourg, like no other, personified in the eyes of both friends and enemies of the Revolution in Germany. They were its symbol, and therefore, by killing them, the Revolution was also killed. Another reason was that they, like no one else, saw the dishonest game that the imaginary leaders had played with the German Revolution from the very beginning, and daily exposed it at the top of their voices. They were qualified witnesses who were killed, since their testimony had nothing to oppose.

“The greatest misfortune and danger of Europe,” wrote V. I. Lenin in his writings, “is that there is no revolutionary party in it. There are lots of traitors, such as the Scheidemans, Renodels, Hendersons, Webbs and Co., or servile souls like Kautsky. There is no revolutionary party.” In this, perhaps, in the weakness of the newly born Communist Party of Germany, and in that heinous, counter-revolutionary, role played by German Social Democracy in 1918-1919. and is the main reason for the defeat of the German Revolution. Then in Germany, as now - in the Russian Federation, the Social Democrats were hated. The revolution is their indelible birthmark. Of great importance in the history of communist doctrine was the restoration and development of V. I. Lenin as the TRUE - REVOLUTIONAL ESSENCE OF MARXISM.

The assassination of January 15, 1919 was the first step, the harbinger of thousands of murders in the months of the power of Noske, millions and millions of murders in the following years of Hitler's power. On February 6, 1919, meetings of the National Assembly began in Weimar, the city of Goethe. From this day began the winding path of the Weimar Republic, which ended in 1933 with the advent of Hitler to power.

S.V.Khristenko

Saturday, January 12, 2019

96th anniversary of the creation of the USSR in the village of Ilsk, Krasnodar Territory

On December 30 in the village of Ilsk of the Krasnodar Territory, the AUCPB and other public organizations celebrated the 96th anniversary of the creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.


Solidarity with French yellow vests in Berlin

More than 250 communists and friends of the French yellow vests activists gathered in Berlin at the Pariser Platz, at the Brandenburg Gate, despite the cold, wet weather and the coming New Year's Eve, to give a clear signal parallel to the Act of 7 protests at the Yellow West in France under the slogan - shoulder to shoulder stand up in Europe against Macron, Merkel, the EU and NATO!

“Yellow vests reopened their brotherhood for us. We had this experience - albeit on a small scale - today at Pariser Platz!


No forgiveness of the super-rich and the instigators of the war in Paris and Berlin - let's speak with one voice against the EU and NATO - we speak French with the rulers in the struggle for our democratic and social rights!

Militant 2019 for all of us! And do not forget: combat 2019, the work of our hands! (in our hands)

29 December 2018 Berlin

On January 8, the DPRK celebrates the birthday of the country's leader, Comrade Kim Jong-un (born January 8, 1982)


Kim Jong-un is in the galaxy of the youngest political leaders of states on the Planet. But his youth further emphasizes his state wisdom and talent of the leader of the country, which is in the grip of a long-term economic blockade, organized by the empire of evil and US violence. Kim Jong-un managed to hold out and did not flinch in front of the onslaught of a powerful American military armada in April 2018, which blocked the sea near the borders of the DPRK, an armada threatening to launch a preventive nuclear strike on the territory of the DPRK in order to destroy the state system in the DPRK and physically destroy the country's leadership. The demonstration for a whole month of frightening US military power did not give them the expected result. The military armada retired from the shores of the DPRK, without having fulfilled its criminal intent. The rigidity and firmness of Kim Jong-un's position forced the American president to propose to Kim Jong-un negotiations, ostensibly to establish the nuclear-free status of the Korean Peninsula and remove blockades from the DPRK. In fact, the American president at the talks tried to put pressure on Kim Jong-un, by deceit and “carrot” trying to force the Korean leader to make concessions to the United States. Nothing succeeded. Trump’s deception over his “peaceful” promises, and the memory of Middle Eastern leaders brutally murdered by order of the United States, was also clearly seen. The DPRK has demonstrated its commitment to the socialist system and the full support of Kim Jong-un from the Korean people.

Under Kim Jong Un, the DPRK continues to develop its industry, new enterprises are commissioned, all branches of agriculture are developing intensively, and the standard of living of the population is constantly increasing. Pyongyang, an environmentally friendly atmosphere is the envy of foreigners who come to the DPRK and have the opportunity to compare European cities with the capital of the DPRK. In the DPRK, culture, art, science, and sport are developing intensively. Through the efforts of Kim Jong-un, the development of contacts with the Republic of Korea continues. Families from Sout Korea have the opportunity to meet with their relatives in the DPRK. To do this, all the conditions have been created. The question of the reunification of the Korean nation is really moving forward.

Congratulating Comrade Kim Jong-un on his birthday, we wish the DPRK leader excellent health for many years and continued success in government and political activities for the benefit of the Korean people.

CC AUCPB

Congratulations to Comrade Kim Jong Un on the Happy New Year


To the Supreme leader

Chairman of the WPK

Chairman of the GKO DPRK

Chairman of the State Council of the DPRK

Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army

Comrade KIM JONG Un

         Pyongyang, DPRK



Dear Comrade KIM JONG UN!

        I cordially congratulate YOU and in your person the heroic Korean people with the upcoming New Year 2019!

       Last year for the DPRK and its leadership became a test of endurance and strength, allegiance to the Juche ideals and readiness to continue its historical path chosen by the people themselves and the great leaders of the country to build a unique socialist power in north-east Asia.

        The past year has shown the world that the DPRK, as a world nuclear power, will not allow anyone to command them and dictate any conditions to it, even by the leading evil empire - the United States. In the outgoing 2018, the DPRK withstood the onslaught of the aggressor. The key to self-reliance in today's world is the possession of atomic weapons, which were successfully developed under the Great Kim Jong-il and implemented by Korean scientists and technologists already under YOU, Distinguished Comrade Kim Jong-un.

        In the upcoming 2019, I wish the heroic and talented people of the DPRK, under YOUR leadership, also boldly and confidently to go forward on the path of building a prosperous socialist state - a bulwark of peace and stability in northeast Asia.

N.A. Andreeva

General Secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

 December 26, 2018 Leningrad

Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Picket on the birthday of I.V. Stalin in Vladivostok






In Vladivostok on December 21, on the birth of I.V. Stalin a picket was held with the laying of flowers at the monument to V.I. Lenin (there is no monument to Stalin in the city). The Bolsheviks distributed newspapers and leaflets at the picket.

THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS TO BE!

APPEAL

by left-patriotic organizations of Belarus,

formed the Coordination Council "UNITY"

to the Soviet people

THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS TO BE!

On December 30, 1922, at the First Congress of Soviets, representatives of the RSFSR, the Ukrainian and Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republics, as well as the Transcaucasian Federation, signed the Declaration on the formation of the USSR and the Union Treaty. Education under the leadership of V.I. Lenin of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics - the world's first multiethnic state of the dictatorship of the proletariat - became the logical design of the victory of the Great October Socialist Revolution in a socialist state in which the working man became the owner, where the friendship of nations and equality of nations became the basis for the further successful construction of a new society on the road to communism .

The great merit in the creation of the USSR and the construction of a socialist society in it belongs to comrade I.V. Stalin. Under his leadership, the Constitution of a unified state of workers and peasants was developed. On December 5, 1936, the Extraordinary VIII All-Union Congress of Soviets adopted the first constitution of victorious socialism in the history of humanity. All the rights of citizens of the USSR The Constitution not only proclaimed (as is done with respect to the rights of citizens by bourgeois constitutions), but also provided the material conditions for their implementation. The country of the Soviets thus received the Constitution of the victory of socialism and workers 'and peasants' democracy, ensuring the interests of the overwhelming majority, in contrast to the bourgeois democracy - democracy for the ruling minority. The Soviet people with love and gratitude called this Constitution in honor of its creator Stalin.

National property, enshrined in the Stalin Constitution, made us the richest country in the world, provided an incredible economic growth boom, unattainable even for the most highly developed capitalist states.

Socialism and friendship of the peoples of the Soviet Union opened up such opportunities for growth, that the country not only restored the economy completely destroyed by the civil war and intervention, but also by 1940 surpassed pre-war Russia (1913) by 7.7 times the volume of industrial output! In the first two "Stalinist" five-year plans the illiterate, poor Russia was reborn. The country built and studied, studied and built factories, power stations, combines, railways, canals ... 9 thousand new industrial enterprises were built without any foreign investments. Already in 1937, over 80 percent of all products were received from new enterprises, and in terms of total industrial output, the USSR came in second place in the world, producing 20 percent of world output (instead of a negligible 4 percent in 1913).

The shocked world called such fantastic rates of development “Bolshevik”.

During the years of Soviet power, we have made great strides forward to the heights of science, education, culture, growth in the well-being and level of public health. We have become the most competent country in the world.

All the above-listed achievements of the Soviet Union allowed the Soviet people to defeat Hitler’s fascism, win the historic victory in the Great Patriotic War and save the world from the brown plague. Then, thanks to the Stalinist methods of leading socialist enterprises, the Soviet economy, destroyed by the war, was restored in a short time in the Soviet Union and the ways of building a communist society were outlined.

However, then after the death of I.V. Stalin in the party took the top of opportunism, the party leadership abandoned the dictatorship of the proletariat in politics and began to introduce capitalist methods of management into the socialist economy. As it turned out, opportunism has the strongest destructive force. It was opportunism that opened the way for capitalism in our Fatherland.

Taking advantage of the fact that the entire political superstructure of the country for a long time, beginning with Khrushchev, did not meet the requirements of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the opportunists led by Gorbachev easily carried out a counter-revolutionary coup in August 1991. And then, on December 8 of the same year, meeting in Viskulyi, 4 kilometers from the border, the heads of state Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich, grossly ignoring the will of the Soviet peoples, expressed at the All-Union referendum on March 17, 1991, to live in a single state, signed a criminal Bialowieza Agreement. The great Soviet Union, which withstood the invasion of Hitler's hordes, resisted the threat of a nuclear attack of the imperialists of the West, was destroyed by traitors with one stroke of the pen without the use of tanks, guns, bombers or other deadly weapons. The names of these spiritual heirs of the Vlasovites, Bandera and other traitors to the Soviet Motherland will be cursed by descendants, the trial of the peoples over the traitors will take place.

The consequences of the destruction of our united state were disastrous. The economy of all Soviet republics was dealt a severe blow, which resulted in a decline in production and, as a result, a significant decrease in the standard of living of the working people, as well as numerous ethnic conflicts where citizens of a once-united country died. These consequences are palpable even in 27 years.

Nevertheless, the laws of social development are inexorable: its movement backwards, back to capitalism, is ruled out, and if it is happening now, then this is a temporary phenomenon. Therefore, insurmountable obstacles often arise on this path: crises wave after wave are now shaking the world capitalist economy, and there is no end to them.

Modern imperialism, as in previous years, is seeking a way out of the crisis in the militarization of the economy and wars, the seizure of foreign territories, sources of raw materials and markets. Ziono-American imperialism, in striving for world domination, has already unleashed many wars on the planet. The ultimate goal of the Western imperialists is the dismemberment and destruction of Russia, which may be followed by the final enslavement of the former Soviet peoples. The threat of World War III looms over humanity.

I.V. Stalin said in this regard: "To eliminate the inevitability of wars, it is necessary to destroy imperialism." But without the restoration of the Soviet Union this task cannot be solved. Our working people will remember that in a single Soviet state, where there was a stable economy at stable prices, where Western crises did not concern us, where there were powerful armed forces, they were confident of their future.

We need precisely the socialist fraternal alliance that the USSR was like, it is precisely in such an alliance that the equality of nations can be ensured that many remember well. And now many workers of the former Soviet republics have realized that, by imposing market bargaining relations between the republics, bourgeois reformers laid the once-for-one Fatherland time bomb that worked in 1991, and now it is market relations that hinder our unification.

No wonder the great V.I. Lenin noted: “The attempts of the capitalist world for decades to resolve the issue of nationalities by combining the free development of nations with the exploitation of man by man turned out to be fruitless ... The bourgeoisie was powerless to establish cooperation among the nations."

How do we restore a socialist union? We, the Communists, have a clear opinion on this issue: they destroyed the Soviet Union from above, as it was done by the participants in the Belovezhsky collusion, and it will have to be restored from below (N.A. Andreyev, I Congress of the Peoples of the USSR, Moscow, 1993), t. e. in a revolutionary way, as was the case with V.I. Lenin. And there is no other way. The bourgeoisie will never give us the Soviet Union on a silver platter.

Only by restoring Soviet power as the dictatorship of the proletariat, by restoring the Soviet republics, can the Soviet Union be restored. In 1922, the Soviet republics were united quickly, because there was nothing for their workers to divide among themselves, unlike the current capitalists.

Unfortunately, at present the communist movement, which should lead the working people to restore the united socialist homeland, is fragmented and affected by the opportunism virus, therefore the working people are not yet ready for decisive action. The unification process has now been led by that part of the bourgeoisie, which needs the free movement of capital, labor, goods and services in order to obtain large profits and ensure security both internal and external.

We Communists support the integration process even on a capitalist basis, since such integration contributes to the unification of the proletariat in the struggle against the bourgeoisie. At the same time, we demand to accelerate integration processes within the framework of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and other associations. As for the Union State of Belarus and Russia, the unification processes in it unacceptably dragged on: there is no promised unification of monetary systems, there is no constitutional act, etc.

However, all these are tactical tasks. As for the strategic task of restoring the USSR, there is a struggle ahead. We Communists believe: “Only the class struggle under the leadership of the Communist Party, firmly standing on the revolutionary Marxist-Leninist positions, brought to the dictatorship of the proletariat, will restore Soviet power as the power of the workers, peasants and the labor intelligentsia, proletarian socialism, revive the great Lenin-Stalinist Union Soviet Socialist Republics and get out of the difficult socio-economic and political situation.

Long live the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics - the offspring of the Soviet people and its leaders V.I. Lenin and I.V. Stalin!



By order of the participants, laying flowers to the bust of I.V. Stalin at the ECC "Stalin Line" text was signed by the leaders of organizations of the communist parties operating in the territory of Belarus:

V.B. Zelikov, secretary of the Central Committee of the

 All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks,

Chairman of the Bureau of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

Belarus and Kaliningrad region



V.V. Draco, Chairman of the Organizing Committee

By education Belarusian

communist party

working people



L.E. Shkolnikov, Secretary of the Central Committee

Communist

Party of the Soviet Union

first secretary of the Belarusian rekom

republican organization of the CPSU



Minsk, 12/21/2018

The USSR is in our hearts





The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is a unique state that united the working people in 1/6 of the globe. The USSR was founded on December 30, 1922 at the First All-Union Congress of Soviets.

The cessation of the existence of the USSR was announced on December 8, 1991, as a result of the signing of the “Belovezhskaya Accords” by the presidents who had seized power in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich. But the USSR lives in the hearts of people in the space of 1/6 of the earth.

***

After the collapse of the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union united hundreds of peoples in a vast area - from the Baltic to Chukotka, from the Arctic Ocean to the Central Asian sands. The unity of nations was fastened by their friendship and communist ideology.

Marxism, which arose in the 19th century, did not provide ready-made recipes for the future socialist state. Specific features could appear only in the course of revolutionary construction. And at the beginning of the 20th century, the Bolsheviks, having founded their party, did not hurry to paint in detail the concept of the future national structure. However, the conditions for the development and decay of the Russian Empire dictated their specifics.

Most of the peoples who lived on the territory of Tsarist Russia became part of the empire at the stage of feudalism. But at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century capitalism developed in the Russian Empire, and a national bourgeoisie appeared on the outskirts. Under these conditions, the struggle of peoples on the outskirts of the empire against national oppression has entered a fork. On the one hand, progressive public figures, fighting against tsarism, advocated unity with the Russian workers, for the joint struggle against autocracy. On the other hand, the national bourgeoisie sought to tear "their own" nationalities from the Russian people, from the Russian working people, cherishing dreams of creating their own "republics" and "emirates".

In the conditions of the popularity of socialist ideas, the national bourgeoisie was dressed in “socialist” clothes: the Ukrainian Petliurists, the Georgian Mensheviks, the Armenian Dashnaks, the Azerbaijani Musavatists, and others called themselves “socialists.” But under the "socialist" clothes hid nationalist gut.

The Bolsheviks on the outskirts of the Russian Empire had to fight "on two fronts": both against tsarism and against the nationalists.

The leader of the Bolshevik Party, VI Lenin spoke for the right of peoples to self-determination. The final Bolshevik understanding of the right of nations to self-determination was formulated at the April conference of the party in 1917. Lenin emphasized that this right includes both the right to secession and the right to unite peoples in one state. His goal: the international organization of the proletariat. “We, for our part, do not want a separation at all. We want as large a state as possible, as close as possible to the union of the largest possible number of nations living next to the Great Russians; we want this in the interests of democracy and socialism, in the interests of bringing to the struggle of the proletariat the greatest possible number of working people of different nations. We want a revolutionary proletarian unity, unity, not division, ”Lenin declared in October 1917. So the goal of the revolution was proclaimed the creation of the Soviet Union.

In the modern bourgeois great-power chauvinistic press, on the Internet one can often find allegations that the Bolsheviks "divided Russia" into the republics. Sometimes such statements are caused not even by malicious intent, but by elementary illiteracy. Even Russian President V. Putin once said that Lenin "laid the atomic bomb" on Russia, creating republics instead of provinces. Putin in general often demonstrated historical ignorance.

The same with the emergence of national republics in the ruins of the Russian Empire. Their occurrence was dictated by the very development of the situation after the February Revolution and the fall of autocracy, the movement of peoples towards self-determination. Moreover, the national bourgeoisie even overtook the working masses in the creation of state formations, in their desire to tear the national outskirts from the center of the country.

Thus, the “Central Rada”, which proclaimed the autonomy of Ukraine, was established in March 1917, when Lenin was still in exile, in Switzerland. The Great Belarusian Council was convened in July 1917. The 1st All-Russian Muslim Congress, which demanded the reorganization of Russia on national-federal principles, was held in Moscow in May 1917.

Thus, the question of republican division, the creation of a federation instead of a unitary division in a province, was predetermined. The question was only in what kind of republics would these be — bourgeois or workers' and peasants?

On November 7 (November 20, a new style), the Ukrainian bourgeoisie in Kiev, which did not recognize the October Revolution, proclaimed the creation of the “Ukrainian People’s Republic”. The working people of Ukraine responded to this act on December 12 (25), proclaiming the Ukrainian Soviet Republic in Kharkov.

On March 25, 1918, the Belarusian bourgeoisie in Minsk announced the creation of their own "people's republic". Belarusian workers proclaimed the creation of the Belarusian Soviet Republic on January 1, 1919.

In the Baltics, puppet "state" formations were created as early as the period when this territory, during the First World War, was conquered by the Germans. The liberation of the Baltic territories by the Red Army contributed to the proclamation of the Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Soviet republics.

The bourgeois republics were established in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan in 1918. Their existence lasted until 1920-1921, when Transcaucasian workers, together with the Red Army, knocked out local nationalists and foreign interventionists.

The national bourgeoisie tried to create their own “state formations” in Russia too. Thus, in March 1918, the bourgeoisie of the Volga region tried to create the “States Idel-Ural”, incorporating the Volga peoples into this “state”. But this counter-revolutionary action was also crushed, and in 1919-1920 the Tatar and Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republics were created as part of Soviet Russia.

Since 1917, feudal lords and the bourgeoisie made a number of attempts to form their “states” in the North Caucasus (“Mountain Republic”, etc.). However, the rout of the White Guards in the Caucasus ended with the proclamation of the Mountain ASSR as part of Soviet Russia.




So, by 1922, the bourgeois "state formations" in most of the former Russian empire were eliminated by the working people. In their place were built the Soviet republics: the Russian SFSR, the Ukrainian SSR, the Byelorussian SSR, and the Transcaucasian Federation (Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan). During the design of the Union held a discussion about the forms of association. During the discussion, it was decided that the Allied republics would not become part of Russia, but would become equal. On December 30, the Union Treaty was signed.

The construction of the Union did not end there: new allied and autonomous republics were created, and in the 1920–1930s the state apparatus had to be repeatedly cleaned of nationalist elements that had penetrated there. The Soviet Union convincingly demonstrated its fortress during the Great Patriotic War, when the Soviet people defeated the Nazi hordes and liberated Europe from fascism. A new historical community formed: the Soviet people.

Rust began to erode the Union after the death of I.V. Stalin, from the 1950s, when the Khrushchevites, declaring the end of the class struggle and the dictatorship of the proletariat, also ceased opposition to the cultivation of nationalism. Especially in the Brezhnev years, not just random people, but overt enemies of socialism, penetrated the state and party apparatus of the CPSU. In the union and autonomous republics, there was a conniving growth of nationalist sentiment. The reactionary nationalist intelligentsia, which was no longer afraid of "repression", went hand in hand with party traitors. “Nationalists and careerists-bribe takers, covered from the Kremlin, came to power in the USSR after 1953. When the time comes, they will drop their masks, throw away membership cards and will openly rule their counties as feudal lords and feudalists, ”Mao Zedong predicted.

Since 1985, by announcing "perestroika", the counter-revolution has begun to liquidate the USSR. By 1991, in a number of republics, local nationalists had already thrown away membership cards and CPSU party clothes. March 17 held an all-Union referendum on the preservation of the Soviet Union. At 80 percent turnout, more than 77% of those who voted said “YES” to the Union. It is noteworthy that the highest percentages of YES (more than in Russia) were in the union republics: in Central Asia and Kazakhstan, Belarus, and Azerbaijan. But in the Baltic States, Moldova, Georgia and Armenia, local nationalist authorities blocked a referendum in most of the territories of these republics. And no wonder that they were afraid of the results of the referendum: the example of Azerbaijan, where the first attacks of overt nationalists were repulsed, and 93% of voters voted for the Union, spoke for itself.

On December 8, 1991, the results of the All-Union referendum were buried in Bialowieza ...

***

The future socialist revolution will again raise the question of the unification of the space of the USSR. People living on the “one sixth of the earth” feel their commonality; the workers remember that they are one Soviet people, temporarily divided by cordons. In addition to the cultural and psychological unity, economic ties play a role. And, paradoxically, but the processes of globalization, contrary to their original purpose, can also play a certain role. The socialist revolution will inevitably break through the border cordons.

This means that the unification of peoples will once again put on the agenda the revival of the USSR, the creation of a new Soviet Union.

Dar Vetrov

To the participants of the XXI International Scientific Symposium





St. Petersburg (Leningrad), December 2018


BEST WISHES to the participants of the symposium

In the Program of the XXI International Scientific Symposium I was surprised by the wording of Clause 1 of the Program: The collapse of communist construction on the foundation of Marxism.

I want to express my opinion on the wording of the reasons for the collapse of the USSR about this discrepancy in the media.

First of all, the USSR was destroyed by actions both from the inside and outside of the USSR. Billions of dollars spent by the West, and above all the United States on the collapse of the USSR, are not badly covered in the communist press. The main internal cause of the collapse of the USSR is the opportunistic degeneration of the CPSU and above all its elite, and not at all the failure of the alleged theory of Marxism or Marxist ideology, as some “political scientists” believe by misunderstanding or malicious intent.

Communist construction was and remains possible only on the foundation of Marxism as the only scientific basis for building the communist civilization, since socialism, the first, initial stage of communism, can only be built on a scientific basis, only on the basis of scientific theory, only on the knowledge of the objective laws of social development, taking into account existing level of scientific and technological progress, and not on the elements of the capitalist market.

Our opinion: the defeat was not socialism on the basis of Marxism, but an opportunist perversion both in theory and in the economic practice of building socialism. Regarding the theory of Marxism, there were no scientists in the USSR who were capable after V.I. Lenin and I.V. Stalin to develop the theory of Marxism in modern conditions, and engaged only in boring teaching and dogmatism, writing and defending useless doctoral dissertations and empty sophisticated "scientific" discussions on little significant issues. According to Lenin, Marxism is not a dogma, but a guide to action. In the dissertations of pseudo-scholars, any guidance in the development of a socialist society based on Marxism in the development of a scientific and technological revolution was NOT sought after.

Being unable to develop Marxism and the theory of building socialism as a transitional stage from capitalism to communism, under Brezhnev, the economy generally abandoned socialist principles, the basic law of organizing a socialist economy - making a profit by increasing productivity through reducing energy costs and implementing economic the law of capitalism in the form of Kosygin-Liberman reform. From the assessment of the profits of production on the basis of the growth of labor productivity, they moved to the capitalist principle of determining profits in monetary terms. This opened up scope for frauds on the part of managers of enterprises that fictitiously increased the cost of production due to the little costly small “additives” on the product (for example, the drawing on the saucepan a flower and increasing its cost by 2-3 times). This made it possible for the director of production to use the release of a state-planned product — with the provision of raw materials and other things — for the release of additionally unrecorded products and marketing by the directors of stores and various sales offices with a division of revenue between the manufacturer and distributor of goods. This is how the underground criminal bourgeoisie appeared and grew up in the USSR.

The process of deformation of socialism, starting from the Brezhnev period, led to the abandonment of the socialist market (where labor is not a commodity and is the means of production) to the elements of the capitalist market with all the ensuing consequences, where everything, including man himself, is a commodity.

At the same time, an opportunistic degeneration of the ruling CPSU took place. The loss of 3.5 million members of the CPSU (b) on the Great Patriotic War fronts of the 5 million party and filling its ranks with politically illiterate people in Marxism significantly affected the political level of the CPSU. In addition, the children of the so-called repressed under Stalin climbed into the party and state apparatus. The “repressed” under Stalin, the descendants of dissatisfied with the Soviet authorities, who created a powerful fifth column of the pro-Western anti-Soviet-minded part of society, which overwhelmed both culture and the media, imposing nihilism on society in relation to the Soviet period of our history. The party was overgrown with opportunists, careerists, anti-communists.

Dogmatism and comics in party politics, complacency and complacency, conceit and p-revolutionary empty talk, political chatter and the separation of theory from socio-political practice led to the ideological degeneration of the CPSU. The party work itself  became a bureaucratic activity. The party declared itself a party of scientific socialism, and then "the party of the whole people." In fact, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union broke away from the people, ceased to be "the mind, honor and conscience," it became rather the opposite. In other words, opportunism has received its political formation in the party.

Along with the rebirth of the party, the state apparatus was bureaucratized. The number of officials increased by 3 times compared with the Stalin period. The concepts of "pure democracy" are being introduced through the media. Through the media, public consciousness is being manipulated - orienting society in any direction desirable for pro-Western “Soviet” liberals.

Socialism can only be built on the scientific basis of the development of Marxism, taking into account the changing nature of the productive forces, by using the achievements of scientific progress. “Without theory, death is ours.” (JV Stalin)

I wish those who consider themselves to be a political scientist and theorist of social development, who have the strength and desire to study the laws of social development, to understand that the future objectively belongs to socialism, to remember that, historically, the national idea of ​​Russia is to go ahead of the entire planet. And therefore, the daring theoreticians, I wish to become the real creators of the development of the theory of Marxism as the only scientific theory of the development of civilization and continue the path of the socialist development of the country. They collapsed the country from above, and it would have to be restored from below.

Good luck on the thorny path of the revival of the USSR!

N.A. Andreeva

General Secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

Saturday, January 5, 2019

Rally in Pyatigorsk in honor of the 139th anniversary of the birth of I.V. Stalin


On December 21, in the city of Pyatigorsk, the Bolsheviks on Kirov Avenue held a rally in honor of the 139th anniversary of the birth of Generalissimo of the Soviet Union Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin. Before the rally, songs about Stalin were performed, newspapers and calendars were distributed for 2019, Bolshevik propaganda work was conducted among the population. The rally opened with the performance of the Stalin State Anthem of the USSR. The secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB, N.A. Degtyarenko, Comrades Nesterova T.A., Britanova T.M., Velichko L.A., Katsan N.S., Achkasova L.I., Kuzmenko L.I. Unanimously adopted a rally statement. At the end of the rally, a meeting of the Bolsheviks took place.

 North Caucasus Bureau of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

Birthday I.V. Stalin in Krasnoyarsk




In the village Ilsk in the Krasnodar Territory, patriots celebrated the 139th anniversary of the birth of I.V. Stalin






This year in the village of Ilsk in Seversky district, the significant date of December 21 coincided with the meeting of the primary village veteran organization, where the leaders and ordinary comrades of this public organization gave the opportunity to speak to the representative of the AUCPB and the ordinary member of the veteran organization L.A.Derbeda on the occasion of the 139th anniversary of the birth of Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin. In my speech, I read the entire article entitled “The most powerful and colorful figure of the strategic command”, taken from the newspaper Bolshevik Sickle and Hammer No. 12 of 2018. Also read, with expression a poem by Alexander Vertinsky "He", dedicated to I.V. Stalin. It was said by me that it was our party the AUCPB that initially defended and raised the name of Stalin to such a high level today. And it is true! I read a quotation from Nina Alexandrovna Andreeva, our leader of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, told by her at the beginning of the open bourgeois counterrevolution about the assessment of the activity of I.V. Stalin.

“... The results of political and state activities of I.V. Stalin are so impressive that they cannot be obscured by any falsification. These results show that Stalin possessed the most important qualities of the largest political leader of the twentieth century, was able to correctly and realistically assess the situation, predict the future, set goals correctly and choose the right means to achieve them, had an iron political will to realize what was intended. No one is able to disprove that under the leadership of Stalin, the USSR achieved tremendous success in all areas, became the second superpower of the world ... "

During the speech, was also read an excerpt by I.V. Stalin on predicting the future, he said during his lifetime. “Many of the affairs of our party and people will be distorted and spat upon, primarily, abroad, and in our country too. Zionism, striving for world domination, will cruelly revenge us for our successes and achievements. It still considers Russia as a barbarous country, as a raw materials appendage. And my name will also be slandered, slandered. To my name will assigned many atrocities. World Zionism will strive with all its might to destroy our Union so that Russia can never rise again. The strength of the USSR is in the friendship of nations. The edge of the struggle will be directed, first of all, at breaking this friendship, at separating the outskirts from Russia. Here, I must admit, we have not done everything. There is still a large field of work. With particular force, nationalism will lift its head. It will supress internationalism and patriotism for a while, but only for a while. There will be national groups within nations and conflicts. Many pygmy leaders will appear, traitors within their nations. In general, in the future development will go more complicated and even frantic ways. The point is that the East is especially agitated. There will be sharp contradictions with the West. And yet, no matter how the events unfold, but time will pass, and the eyes of new generations will be turned to the deeds and victories of our socialist Fatherland. Year after year, new generations will come. They will again raise the banner of their fathers and give us their due in full. They will build their future on our past.”

Having finished the speech, L.A. Derbeda congratulated all those present to the veteran meeting on the 139th anniversary of the birth of I.V. Stalin, wished everyone good health, longevity and further success in the patriotic work on the truth about Stalin, about the Great Patriotic War, about our entire Soviet history.





The speech by L.A. Derbeda was liked by the veteran meeting present, thanks were made for the interesting information, for the poem dedicated to Stalin, and willingly took pictures with party symbols of the AUCPB for memory in honor of the 139th anniversary of the birthday of I.V. Stalin.

Glory to the Great Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin!

L.A.Derbeda

Ilsk, Krasnodar Territory