On October 10, the DPRK celebrates the 73rd anniversary of the establishment of the Workers' Party of Korea

developed by the Great Leader, Comrade Kim Il Sung. The WPK in the DPRK is called the Party of the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung. As a coherent theory, the Juche idea was formulated by the Great Kim Jong Il. The Koreans themselves characterize the WPK “as a single organizational unit, where a single ideological system of leadership is asserted; the party forms a whole with the masses, is responsible for their fate and cares for them; it is an experienced and proven organization, distinguished by high leadership skills; it is a party with a bright perspective that reliably ensured the continuity of leadership. ”

Kim Jong Il did a lot for the development of the party, the country, the Armed Forces of the DPRK, to increase the welfare of the people and the growth of the international authority of the DPRK and therefore at the 4th WPK conference in April 2012 after his death in December 2011, it was decided to perpetuate the name of Kim Jong-il as the eternal Secretary General of the WPK.

Today the party is headed by Comrade Kim Jong-un in the status of Chairman of the Workers' Party of Korea. Kim Jong-un continues the work of his great predecessors as the leader of the WPK, the Chairman of the State Committee of the DPRK, the Chairman of the State Council of the DPRK and the Supreme Commander of the Korean People’s Army.

Within 7 years after the death of the Great Kim Jong-il under the conditions of the sharply aggravated international situation in the world and the descent of mankind towards the red line of the mutually destroying third world war, Kim Jong-un, skillfully leading the country and the party, demonstrates the high professionalism of a world-class state and political figure.

The Central Committee of the AUCPB welcomes the signing on September 19 of the Pyongyang September Joint Declaration by the leader of the DPRK, Comrade Kim Jong-un and the President of the Republic of Korea Moon Jae-In, held on September 19 in Pyongyang.

We regard this as a new very important step in the protracted process of uniting Korea into a single confederative state of Kore, as a very important step in the issue of family reunification separated by the will of the United States after World War II. The Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung and the Great Kim Jong Il worked a lot on solving the issue of uniting the Korean nation.

We welcome all the leaders adopted in September during the talks and other very important agreements that should contribute to easing tensions in Northeast Asia and changing the military-political situation towards easing the US dictatorship on the Korean Peninsula and in this region as a whole.

On the occasion of the 73th anniversary of the formation of the WPK, we wish the courageous, talented and hard-working Korean people of the DPRK to continue firmly and confidently to advance along the path of building their own independent prosperous socialist state under the leadership of WPK Chairman Comrade Kim Jong un.

CC AUCPB

Elections to the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region or how people allowed themselves to be deceived

On September 9, 2018 in the Irkutsk region  elections of deputies of the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk region were held. According to the results of voting in the Legislative Assembly, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation received 18 deputy seats: 9 - in single-member constituencies and 9 - according to party lists. "United Russia" - 17 seats, the Liberal Democratic Party - 4, Fair Russia and the Civic Platform - 3 seats each.

During the pre-election race, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation repeatedly held rallies against pension reform with the appeal “Not a single vote in the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region for United Russia, we choose the Communist Party of the Russian Federation!” The number of voters in the Irkutsk region is 23.6%. The people shouted: “Vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation!”, “Let's go against United Russia!”

On September 10, 2018, citizens who succumbed to the deception of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and gave their votes for it were jubilant about the victory of the Communist Party in the elections to the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region.

However, on September 11, 2018, when the regional election commission of the Irkutsk region published a list of persons who passed to the Legislative Assembly from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, this exultation quickly ended. The people found out who they  had “dragged” from this party to the Legislative Assembly.

In single-mandate constituencies from the Communist Party passed: Mrs.A. Kudryavtsev, a member of United Russia in the recent past, an ardent anti-Communist; Mr. V.I. Kondrashov, a former member of United Russia (he was previously the mayor of Irkutsk, was elected from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, and after his victory joined United Russia), currently Kondrashov, check under art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Fraud"; Mr. A.A. Romanov, in the recent past, the deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation from United Russia, who voted, like all members of United Russia, for anti-popular laws. In the Angarsk single-mandate constituencies from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, three large businessmen, in the past representatives of United Russia, passed to the Legislative Assembly. Pavel Sumarokov, a major capitalist in the livestock sector, was elected in the Usolsky single-mandate district. In the single-mandate constituency of Bratsk, a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, a resident of Moscow, a rather non-poor citizen Andrei Andreev and capitalist Denis Shershnev, director of Baikal Svyazstroi passed. Of the 9 who passed to the Legation Assembly of the Irkutsk Region, according to the lists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, there were also deputies, who could be called "people's" only while in a state of drug intoxication. Namely: on the party lists from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation were elected: Ilya Alekseevich Sumarokov (member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation), a major agricultural capitalist of the Irkutsk region; H.E. Nosenko, the first secretary of the Irkutsk City Party Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, popularly called "Miss Mink Fur Coat"; Andrei Sergeevich Levchenko, a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the son of the governor of the Irkutsk region, Sergey Georgievich Levchenko (this governor is currently being tried for poaching - the killing of a sleeping bear in its den); Andrei Sergeevich Levchenko is a major capitalist, the director of Stalkonstruktsiya, who for a long time did not pay wages to his employees and in respect of which the Investigative Committee carried out checks on signs of a criminal act on the fact of non-payment of taxes. Thus, out of 18 deputies of the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, 12 deputies of big capital passed. Some of them are adherents of United Russia. After the elections, the people realized how he himself replaced some capitalists in the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region with others.

E.A. Rulkov, second secretary of the Irkutsk Regional Committee, officially announced that the Communist Party faction in the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region will be united with deputies from the Civic Platform, the LDPR, Just Russia, as well as deputies from United Russia. Indeed, residents of the Irkutsk Region, who believed the pseudo-communist Communist Party of the Russian Federation, can be characterized in the words of V.I. Lenin:

"People have always been and will always be stupid victims of deception and self-deception in politics, until they learn for any moral, religious, political, social phrases, statements, promises to look for the interests of certain classes." (Three sources and three components of Marxism. March 1913). PSS, 5th ed., Vol. 23, p. 47

Comrade WILLIAM

How salmon after being caught is destroyed

How  salmon after being caught is destroyed

(copy and paste link)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNrt1_wbK9M

NOT A GAME OF ELECTIONS, BUT A CLASS STRUGGLE FOR SOCIALISM!

On the results of the elections of September 9, 2018

On September 9, the elections of heads of 22 regions, heads of four regional centers, deputies of legislative bodies of 16 constituent entities of the Ryssian Federation took place. In seven single-member districts, additional elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation were held. Elections were also held in the representative bodies of administrative centers, etc. A total of about five thousand election campaigns of different levels took place.

Nothing special, as in the previous elections, happened at these elections. The results of the elections are quite as expected.

The ruling party “United Russia”, using the support of the President of the Russian Federation, retained “leading” positions in most regions of the country, slightly lowering its rating (which is already low with even lower voter turnout in these elections) against the background of popular discontent initiated by the Russian government the so-called "Pension reform" (conducted at the direction of the International Monetary Fund). On the other hand, the socially-democratized Communist Party of the Russian Federation and other parliamentary “opposition” parties (LDPR and SR) somewhat strengthened their positions, using the workers' discontent with the liberal reforms of the Russian government.

In other words, a certain “traditional” redistribution of local income seats among the bourgeois parties took place within the framework of the “multi-party” political system formed in Russia with the “leading” positions of the ruling party.

In elections to regional parliaments, the most seats went to United Russia - 472 seats, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation - 160, LDPR - 73, "Fair Russia" - 50, "Communists of Russia" - 6, "Patriots of Russia" - 4, "Civic Platform" - 4, the Party of Pensioners - 3, other parties received 1 mandate each - the CPSU, the Pensioners Party of Russia, the Party of Growth, the Delo party and the Greens party. Another 10 mandates were self-nominated. Total replaced mandates - 788.

In the elections of governors only in 4 out of 26 the second round of elections will take place (September 23). In 16 regions, the governors and representatives of the ruling party successfully "won". They are Moscow Mayor Sobyanin and Moscow Region Governor Vorobyov, Acting Governors of Yakutia, Altai and Krasnoyarsk Territories, Amur, Voronezh, Ivanovo, Kemerovo, Magadan, Nizhny Novgorod, Novosibirsk, Omsk, Orel (candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation), Pskov, Samara and Tyumen regions, and also the governor of the Chukotka Autonomous Region.

The second round of gubernatorial elections should be held in the Khabarovsk and Primorsky Territories, Khakassia and the Vladimir Region.

Of the four regional centers in three (in the capital of Khakassia, Abakan, in Tomsk and in Khabarovsk), United Russia wins, in Yakutsk, United Russia was won over by a candidate from the Russian Revival Party.

The single-mandate candidates from United Russia are winning the by-election to the State Duma of the Russian Federation in five of the seven single-member districts - that is, all where the ruling party has nominated its candidates. The candidate from the Liberal Democratic Party "wins" in the Amur District, from the Communist Party - in Saratov.

The leader of United Russia, Prime Minister D. Medvedev reiterates that "the outcome of the elections for the party is quite worthy, the party has acted stably and retains leadership." “The results of the past elections demonstrate a resource of public confidence,” said Russian President V.V. Putin

Chairman of the "ER" B. Gryzlov is even more categorical: "Voters see their party in United Russia, they trust the party" (!).

Is it so?

Bourgeois elections are, although unreliable, but a barometer of the political moods of the population.

In most regions, “ER” (United Russia) received a significantly lower percentage than in similar elections to regional parliaments in 2013. So, in the elections to the parliament of Bashkiria in 2013, “ER” received 76.09%, and in these elections (2018) - 58, 31%, Khakassia - 46.32 and 25.46, Transbaikalia - 43.09 and 28.3, Arkhangelsk Oblast - 40.69 and 31.59, Vladimir Region - 44.33 and 29.57, Ivanovo Region - 55.77 and 34.14, Irkutsk Region - 42.36 and 27.83, the Kemerovo Region the regions - 86.21 and 64.40, the Ulyanovsk region - 57.62 and 33.96, etc.

The number of United Russia's deputies in 16 regional parliaments decreased from 616 (2013) to 472 (2018).

If we take the results of the vote, taking into account the voter turnout, then the ruling party has practically no support. Two thirds of the population simply ignored the elections to regional parliaments. Therefore, the head of the CEC of the Russian Federation, E. Pamfilova, cynically declared: “The most important thing, no matter WHAT THE FAITH WILL BE, is that it should be adequately be reflected in the protocols ...”.

For example, voter turnout in the elections to the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region was 27%, of which number took part in the voting for the "ER" 27.83% of voters cast their ballots. Thus, the “ER” is supported by only 7.5% of the population, in other words, a little more than 7 out of 100 voters. A similar situation is observed in other regions. Turnout ranges from 35 to 25%, with the exception of a number of national regions (40 to 50%) and Kemerovo region (66%).

And if you take into account ballot box stuffing? "... There were a lot of violations - absolutely wild and inexplicable, which do not fit into any logic of behavior of the district commissions," admitted A. Klyukin, member of the CEC of the Russian Federation. And the administrative resource? People are forced to join United Russia and are driven to polling stations, for example, they force all employees of Housing Management Companies to “join” ER (using the example of Novosibirsk).

A similar situation develops in the "election" of governors, although turnout, for quite understandable reasons (sometimes governors appointed by the president of the Russian Federation, a more powerful administrative resource is involved) is somewhat higher than in regional parliaments.

But in these elections turnout is low in many regions. For example, in the Novosibirsk region - 29.52%, the Krasnoyarsk Territory - 28.91%, the Pskov Region - 36.89, the Amur Region - 31.24, the Moscow Region - 38.51, the city of Moscow - 30.9%. In the elections in the Novosibirsk region, interim governor Travnikov scored 64.52%. So, about 20% of the population voted for him, that is, 4/5 of the population does not support him. A similar situation is in Moscow, where the mayor SS was elected in the same way (70.17%). Sobyanin with a turnout of 30.9%.

An even lower turnout is characteristic of the by-election to the State Duma of the Russian Federation in single-mandate constituencies. For example, according to the Zavolzhsky single-mandate district, the candidate from the "ER" won, receiving 36.21% with the turnout of 24.3%. Thus, “ER” was “popularly” supported by about nine out of 100 voters (8.8% of eligible voters).

Elections to the parliament of the Irkutsk region, as well as in the Altai Territory, were held with a large number of spoiled ballots: 21,759 with 464,778 valid.

Other parties, primarily parliamentary - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia and the SR, strengthened their positions. Thus, in 16 regional parliaments, the CPRF increased its representation from 72 to 160 mandates (including single-mandate ones from 13 to 60), the LDPR from 33 to 82, and the SR from 29 to 50 mandates.

In three regions, the Communist Party ranked the EP by the number of votes. Thus, in the elections to the regional parliament of the Ulyanovsk region, the CPRF gained 36.3% (2.5 times better than in the similar elections in 2013), "ER" - 34%, in the Irkutsk region, the Communist Party gained 34% (15 % higher than in 2013), "ER" - 28%, in the Republic of Khakassia, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation - 31% (17% more than in 2013), "ER" - 25.5%.

The last time the Communist Party of the Russian Federation won the elections to the regional parliament was only in 2005.

In seven regions in the elections to the parliaments of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation increased the percentage of votes compared with 2013. For example, in the Ivanovo region - from 14.5 to 26.9%, the Republic of Buryatia - from 19.3 to 25.7%, in the Trans-Baikal Territory - from 14.1 to 24.6, in the Yaroslavl region - from 11 to 24 , in the Nenets Autonomous District from 19.2 to 23.8, in the Vladimir region - from 13.5 to 23.7, in the Smolensk region - from 15 to 23.

In the Oryol region, the candidate of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation A.E. Klychkov, gaining 83.55% (the highest percentage among other acting governors) with a high turnout of 57.76%.

In Khakassia, the candidate for governors from the Communist Party passed the candidate from the EP and went to the second round (45% against 32.4% of the governor from the "ER"), in Primorsky Krai the candidate from the Communist Party also went to the second round.

In the Vladimir Oblast and the Khabarovsk Territory, candidates from the Liberal Democratic Party reached the second round (with the current governors).

In the by-election to the State Duma, one candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (45%), one candidate from the LDPR passed.

The CPRF has strengthened its position in the parliaments of the administrative centers. In the Duma of Novgorod the Great, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation beat “ER”, receiving 30.6% of the vote. In eight more cities, it ranked second, gaining from 20 to 25% in six capitals (Belgorod, Abakan and Maykop, Yekaterinburg, Yakutsk, Ryazan). In general, for the 12 capitals where the elections took place, the CPRF used to have 2 mandates, now - 22.

On September 10, the Communist Party leader G. Zyuganov said at a press conference at the Interfax news agency: “The elections were really milestone. We have entered a new political era. " Member of the Presidium of the Central Committee, Secretary of the Central Committee S.P. Obukhov did "unravel his lip": "on the basis of the results of the elections, the possibility of creating a two-party system in the person of United Russia and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation was built" (!).

Are the elections really "boundary"?

"As for the results of the elections, the best figures among the governors are from the Communist Party representative A. Klychkov in the Orel region," Zyuganov said.

Zyuganov is silent that the candidate of the Communist Party A. Klychkov was appointed in October 2017. Acting Governor of the Russian President Vladimir V. Putin and he was supported by the PARTY OF POWER.

That's all in FOCUS.

“In the Ulyanovsk region we scored 36.3%, and United Russia was about 34%. Our percentage is almost two times better than in the State Duma elections in 2016! ”, Said I. Melnikov, first deputy chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and head of the Central Staff of the Communist Party for the elections.

Is it so?

In the elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation in the Ulyanovsk region in 2016, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation really got two times fewer votes (19.16%) than in the elections of September 9, 2018 to the Legislative Assembly of the Ulyanovsk region (36.24%). But if in the elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation in 2016, turnout was 52.3%, then in the elections of September 9, 2018 - only 27.0%. Thus, in the elections of September 9, 2018, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation supported approximately 10% of voters eligible to vote, as much as in 2016.

The question is, is it possible, at such a low turnout as in these elections, to talk about public support?

For example, in the Saratov single-member constituency for the additional elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation, a candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation passed, receiving as much as 45.35% of the votes. BUT: voter turnout of only 16.05%. Hence, the candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation cast their votes to 7.3% of voters eligible to vote.

“It was of fundamental importance for us that a strong team go to the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region,” Zyuganov said at a briefing on September 9.

In the elections to the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk Region, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation obtained a good result and outperformed “ER” in the number of votes and mandates. From the Communist Party in the Legislative Assembly passed 9 single-mandate and 9 on the list. But who are they? Mainly representatives of big business went to the Legislative Assembly.

In the Legislative Assembly of the Irkutsk region from the Communist Party passed: V.I. Kondrashov - a native of the construction complex, the former mayor of Irkutsk and a member of the "ER", since October 2015, Deputy Prime Minister of the regional government; P. Sumarokov - representative of the agrarian business, deputy. gene. Director of Usolsky Pig Complex (with a turnover of billions of rubles); A.S. Belov - General Director of AgroBaikal LLC (with a turnover of billions of rubles); Shershnev D.P. - The General Director and the sole founder of Baikal Svyaz Energostroy LLC, the company occupies the 8th place in the Russian market for the construction of communication networks in terms of revenue and 4 in the length of the line; A.S. Levchenko is the general director of Stalkonstruktsiya (the son of Governor SG Levchenko), the company is a co-founder of several other companies in the field of metal structures; E.S. Sarsenbayev, the general director of Sarsenbayev LLC, had a criminal record under Part 3 of Art. 89 “Theft of state or public property committed by theft” of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR; and etc.

In the Irkutsk region, the high rating of the Communist Party is due to the formation of influential local business elites around the governor of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation S.G. Levchenko. It is known that the Communist Party of the Russian Federation has long resorted to the practice of selling mandates, in fact, like other bourgeois political parties.

In some regions, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation openly supported the henchmen of the ruling regime. For example, in the Novosibirsk region, the first secretary of the Novosibirsk Regional Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the mayor of Novosibirsk, Lokot, withdrew his candidacy in favor of the acting governor Travnikov and supported him in the elections for the support of the mayoral elections in 2019. Novosibirsk Regional Committee of the Communist Party kept silent.

In these elections, the KPRF skillfully used the protest potential of workers against the so-called government initiative of the Russian Federation. "Pension reform", releasing a couple of popular discontent, leading the workers from the class struggle towards the ballot box. It is no coincidence that the All-Russian protest actions initiated by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation against the pension robbery of workers took place after the adoption of the bill in the first reading and right before the elections - July 28 and September 2. Along with this - the sale of the CPRF mandates to representatives of capital and agreements with the bourgeois authorities both at the federal and regional levels.

The Communist Party of the Russian Federation, is communist in name only; in its class essence, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is a bourgeois party that advocates social reforms within the framework of the preservation of the capitalist system, seeking for itself the status of one of the ruling parties in a two-party bourgeois system.

The results of the elections show that the working population is increasingly disappointed in the bourgeois elections and does not trust deputies of any color. The fall of the ER rating, an increase in the percentage of votes for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation shows that the population does not accept the liberal course of the Russian government and turns to the socialist alternative to the development of the country.


Whoever becomes mayor or governor, no matter how many representatives of the Social Democrats from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation in local representative bodies, experience shows that all of them will express the interests of big capital, “because coexistence in such states (bourgeois - approx.) authorities and relatively "democratic" local institutions, municipal governments, etc. it is explained solely, exclusively by the fact that these local institutions are engaged in “tin-washing of sinks” harmless for the bourgeois state, water supply, electric trams, etc. events that are not capable of undermining the foundations of what is called the “existing social order” (VI Lenin. PSS, vol. 12, p. 262-263).

The bourgeois liberal reforms, which are destructive for the country, can and should be stopped not by elections according to the rules of the financial oligarchy, not by conciliation with the bourgeois authorities, but by unfolding the class struggle for the vital interests and rights of the working people, explaining to the working masses the need to revive socialism, accomplish the socialist revolution, destroy the power of capital, the revolutionary transition of power to the working people.

A.V. Denisyuk

Greetings to DPRK leader Kim Jong-un

Greetings to DPRK leader Kim Jong-un

Supreme Leader

Chairman of the  Workers' Party of Korea

Chairman of the GKO DPRK

Chairman of the State Council of the DPRK

Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army

To Comrade KIM JONG-UN

          Pyongyang, DPRK

 Dear Comrade KIM JONG-UN!

 We were pleased to learn about the historic meeting of YOU, the leader of the DPRK, and the President of South Korea, held on September 18-20 in Pyongyang, and the signing of the Pyongyang September September 19 joint declaration.

       We consider this as a new and very important step in the protracted process of unification of Korea into a single confederative state of Koryo, as a very important step in the issue of family reunification, separated by the will of the United States after the end of World War II.

       We welcome all the important documents adopted during the talks, which should help to alleviate tensions in Northeast Asia and change the military and political situation in the direction of weakening the US dictate in this region.

       Congratulating you, dear comrade Kim Jong-un, with the new successful advancement on the path of peace and harmony on the Korean peninsula, we wish the DPRK further success on the diplomatic front in realizing the dream of the Great Leader of Comrade Kim Il Sung and Great Kim Jong Il on the independent unification of Korea.

N.A. Andreeva

General Secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

From the history of the struggle for an active offensive Bolshevik nature of the publications of SIM (Serp I Molot (Sickle and Hammer)) newspaper

All issues of the newspaper were issued during the development of the bourgeois counter-revolution in 1991, during the period when the criminal oligarchic bourgeoisie came to power, playing democracy, but pursuing a policy of permissiveness for pathological anti-communism and bestial anti-Stalinism.

Recently, the authorities, playing neoliberalism, have softened the policy of anti-Stalinism, trying to reduce the heat of protest speeches, because now, according to generally accepted social polls, more than 60% of the population advocate Stalin, defining him as the greatest statesman and politician of the twentieth century.

Over the past years, the newspaper has successfully fulfilled its main task - to be an agitator and propagandist of Bolshevik ideas, respond promptly to real-time events, give them a political assessment. Of course, the style, selection and content of publications are to a certain extent determined by the degree of responsibility for the assigned business and the position of its editor-in-chief, his or her level of political literacy, fighting qualities and adherence to the ideas of Bolshevism. The management of the editors of the Bolshevik newspaper is a political question. Due to the staffing issue in the newspaper, four editor-in-chiefs changed during the reporting period.

The first issue of the newspaper was published in April 1993. Until 1993, the press organ of the AUCPB was the newspaper Yedinstvo, the editor-in-chief of which was the real patriot of our Soviet Motherland, the Bolshevik Alexander Nikolaevich Ustinsky. The newspaper was published in Orel. Since April 1993, the Central Printing Body of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party Communist Party of Bolsheviks became the Serp and Molot newspaper headed by the chief editor of the newspaper Oleg Matveyevich Andreev and the place of publication in Krasnoyarsk.

The first editions of the newspaper did not cause any complaints, but, beginning in 1996, the editor-in-chief of the newspaper began to include articles of a completely non-Bolshevik nature. From the side of the chief editor O.M. Andreev, there has been a tendency to separate the publication of the newspaper from the Central Committee of the AUCPB on the basis of the principle that the newspaper works for itself, and the party the Central Committee, for itself, without the right to control the content of published materials. The editor-in-chief began to prevent the publication of politically important, Bolshevik articles sent from party organizations and began to post articles that were opportunist in nature, or rather containing Trotskyist provisions (these articles were duplicated by readers and the Secretariat of the Central Committee), while ignoring the opinions and objections of a member of the newspaper’s editorial board. V.V.Matveyko  Moreover, O.M.Andreev  in the newspaper, tried to launch a revisionist debate on the topic: “Did we have socialism or not?” and “Was the revolution in October 1917 socialist or only bourgeois-democratic?”.

On one of the published articles on this topic prof. Abner Solovyov “The twentieth century in Russia. What has been done? ”(SiM No. 7 (52), 1997), the editorial office and the Secretariat of the Central Committee began to receive indignant responses from members of the AUCPB — open letters: filmmaker G. Bezgubenko; members of the Central Committee of Evdokimov V.Ya., Ryabov V.I. (Leningrad); Party organizers of the Central Committee A. Kabakov. (Khabarovsk Territory) and Sorkina A.N. (Bryansk and Oryol region); Ptitsyna B.A. (Vladimir), V. Shkarupy (Stavropol Territory, Minvody), Stepanova V.I. (Barnaul), Ilina A.G. (Buzuluk), Evsyukova M.S. (collective letter from the Kaliningrad party organization) and many others.

The Secretariat of the Central Committee of the AUCPB conducted an in-depth analysis of all publications in the SIM for 1996-1997. The question was submitted for consideration by the Plenum of the Central Committee on March 1, 1998, and at the Plenum of the Central Committee on April 15, 1998. O.M. Andreev he was relieved of his duties as a member of the Central Committee of the AUCPB and was expelled from the ranks of the AUCPB for publishing anti-Bolshevik materials and attempting to turn the newspaper into an independent, not subordinate print organ. Secretary of the Krasnoyarsk Regional Committee of the AUCPB Comrade Yuriy Fedorovich Shinarev was recommended to join the editorial board of CC, which he later headed.

Subsequently O.M. Andreev in the municipal newspaper of Krasnoyarsk published an article in which he openly stated that “the purpose of his work in the newspaper“ SIM ”was to free the party of the AUCPB from Stalinism” ... Thus the decision of the Secretariat of the Central Committee was confirmed.

In connection with the change of residence of Yu.F.Shinarev  and moving to another region of the Russian Federation as the chief editor of the newspaper, he was replaced by Vladimir Komarov. He re-registered the newspaper on September 4, 2007 with a change of name to “Worker-Peasant Sickle and Hammer” (RK Sim). Vladimir NikolaevichKomarov  headed the newspaper's editorial office until December 2015.

The former editor-in-chief of the Ukrainian newspaper “Workers 'and Peasants' Pravda”, the former Secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB,  Anatoly ArkadyevichMayevsky, while in the SIZO prison in Vinnitsa and having lost the opportunity to publish his newspaper “Workers 'and Peasants' Pravda” (RCP), for reasons known to him, Bolshevik positions, engaged in a pseudo-revolutionary clique and a distortion of the party’s position in assessing the domestic and foreign policy of the Russian Federation, a distorted interpretation of the decisions of the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the AUCPB.

In order to popularize his delusional ideas regarding the preparation of a partisan war in the territory of the Russian Federation, he tried to use not only the newspaper "RK SiM", but also the editorial offices of newspapers of other active Communist Parties and organizations that are not friendly to us.

Maevsky sent his articles to the editor of "RK SIM" E.A.Fatyanova  - the assistant to V.N.Komarov for publishing the newspaper, secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB. In it, Maevsky found a like-minded person in leftism and propaganda of his pseudo-revolutionism because of the political illiteracy of both, their adventurousness and provocation, their unwillingness to take into account the factors of the real economic and political situation in the Russian Federation (not to mention foreign policy factors), identifying the current situation in the country and in the world with the situation of the beginning of the twentieth century. Having lost the opportunity to publish his newspaper to the RCP in 2014, Mayevsky set out with the help of Fatyanova to seize the “RK Sim” publication and use the newspaper to defeat the AUCPB party. During the years 2014-2015, Fatyanova, pervertedly interpreting, like Mayevsky, the cited party documents, accused the party "of opportunism and turning the party into a hotbed of anti-communism and the need to return the party to the right path."

By Decree of the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the AUCPB dated November 11, 2015, E.A. Fatyanova was released from all the positions she occupied and expelled from the party with the wording:

“For actions aimed at splitting the party, attempting to conduct anti-party work within the party, for betraying the interests of the party, for insincerity, duplicity, and deceit.” The same decree made the decision: “To stop the publication of the Workers 'and Peasants' Sickle and Molot” newspaper on the basis of the Krasnoyarsk party organization of the AUCPB, to re-register the RK SiM publication and renew it in another city. Responsible - Central Committee of the AUCPB.

A.A.Mayevsky  was expelled from the party by the decision of the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the AUCPB dated February 21, 2016 with the wording “For  anti-party activities and the totality of the anti-party materials created by him”.

Resolutions of the Secretariat of the Central Committee were approved at a plenary session of the Central Committee of the AUCPB on May 16, 2016, which also confirmed the APPEAL of the SECRETARIAT of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks to party members and co-sponsors dated February 21, 2016, explaining the position of the party on the issues under discussion.

According to the decision of the Secretariat of the Central Committee of November 11, 2015, the publication of the newspaper “RK SiM” in Krasnoyarsk was stopped and resumed in Pyatigorsk, a new editorial staff was formed. Alexey Vladimirovich Denisyuk, secretary of the Central Committee, was appointed chief editor. The newspaper was re-registered with the change of its name to “The Bolshevik Sickle and Hammer” on September 30, 2016.

Of the minuses in the publication of the newspaper today, I will note only one - so far they have not been able to organize a proper flow of letters from party organizations to the topic of the day and to the reflection of Soviet memorable dates.

Puzzled by Fatyanov’s leader, a group of 8 people of hurray revolutionaries expelled from the AUCPB (including eight and Fatyanova and Mayevsky themselves) announced at the beginning of 2016, nothing less than “the AUCPB revolutionaries party” and on behalf of this “party” continued to release "RK Sim". Some of these eight run to the events of the left forces in Chelyabinsk and Krasnoyarsk (they don’t have sympathizers in other cities), using our symbols and our party attributes. Who is this little group trying to fool? In such a microscopic number, the Fatyanova group is not capable of making a revolution even within the city yard. Another question - who sponsors these adventurers? Most likely, the special services of the Russian Federation, which have already built up several "twins parties" of the AUCPB. The first experience — with the creation of the “AUCPB Future” by Governor Tikhonov in 2007 — a creation by the Kremlin, failed. You can try to organize the destruction of our party by blasting it from the inside (an attempt by Fatyanova and Mayevsky), or by creating pseudo doubles to disorient patriotic people in the leftist movement. There is in Moscow a fragment of the newly-minted Lapinsky VKP (b) (Lapin was expelled from the AUCPB in January 1995) already without Lapin - he was expelled from the mini party he had created by his own comrades. There are others with the same name VKPB (AUCPB) in the amount of 1-3-5 people (often come to us on the Internet with the offer of "cooperation"). As for Fatyanova herself, she relocated nearer to us, in the AUCPB, from the National Bolshevik Party, after its prohibition in 2007. The former contacts with the FSB were preserved? .. To all of them, the so-called newly-minted AUCPB with and without attachments counteraction of AUCPB, we answer - "In vain they spend money of the Russian payers for an obviously losing adventure". We will continue our work, following the course of Lenin-Stalin, remembering that "the road will be strengthened by the one who is walking along it."

N.A. Andreeva

In October, the AUCPB celebrates the publication of the 300th issue of the Serp i Molot (SiM) (Sickle and Hammer) newspaper.

The Central Committee of the AUCPB congratulates the editorial staff of the central press organ of the Central Committee of the AUCPB newspaper Bolshevik Serp and Molot, its chief editor Alexei Vladimirovich Denisyuk and the readers of the Bolshevik SiM on the publication of the 300th issue of the newspaper and wishes success in fulfilling its honorable and historically important mission - the popularization of the ideas of Bolshevism among the masses. We wish the editor-in-chief and all the comrades who are involved in the preparation and publication of the newspaper, excellent health, well-being, a lot of vitality and the implementation of the plans that have been set forth.

CC AUCPB