Thursday, March 5, 2020
On the position of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation regarding the adoption of the new Constitution of the Russian Federation
In two issues of the newspaper Pravda (No. 9 of 01/30/2020 and No. 12 of 02/06/2020) - the central organ of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) - a statement by the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation “The Constitution is obliged to protect the interests of the majority” and the article “Russia we need a Constitution of justice and a government of public trust ”, signed by the chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Gennady Zyuganov.
As previously noted in the materials of the AUCPB, a party led by Zyuganov is only called a communist party, but in reality it is a Social Democratic party of a parliamentary type. This is exactly what it was planned by the trinity - Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Zyuganov - at their joint meeting in August 1991, and it was created in February 1993. The ideological principles of the Communist Party — opportunism, revisionism and cooperation with the bourgeoisie — have been the foundation of the Communist Party since its founding. . In politics, she denies the revolutionary path of struggle and the dictatorship of the proletariat, in economics, it admits its multistructure with private ownership of the means of production.
The Communist Party’s statement noted that “In the event of a fair referendum being conducted fairly and not replaced by a“ nationwide poll ”, the“ execution ”Constitution (Yeltsin’s 1993 - V.Z.) had no chance of success.” We have to remind our readers that precisely because the Communist Party brought 15% of voters to a referendum on December 12, 1993, the Yeltsin bourgeois Constitution became the main law of the Russian Federation, which is still in force (According to official figures, 54.81% of the Yeltsin draft constitution The Russian Federation was supported then by 58.43% of those who voted). The AUCPB, as is known, urged not to participate either in the blood parliamentary elections or in a referendum under the conditions of the bourgeois Yeltsin dictatorship.
Further, in a statement by the Communist Party, Putin’s amendments are not enough, so their party proposes its own:
“- to fix the belonging of the Russian bowels to the people ...;
- oblige the government to index pensions ...;
- fix the retirement age as the most important social guarantee: 60 years for men, 55 years for women;
- establish that the minimum wage and minimum pension cannot be less than the subsistence level ”(The statement lists seven more similar proposals).
The question arises: since 1993, Zyuganovites have been sitting in the State Duma of Russia for 27 years and constantly come up with similar proposals that the Russian parliament has not accepted. Why? Because the Zyuganovites, who call themselves Leninists, in reality do not want to heed the warning of V.I. Lenin on "parliamentary cretinism" under the rule of the bourgeoisie.
At the end of his article published in the February issue of Pravda, Zyuganov writes: “At the same time, we also abstained from voting against (the government of Mishustin - VB), believing that we need to give the new cabinet a chance to change the situation for the better.” That is, for many years, deputies from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation have not learned anything if they believe that the bourgeois government is able to improve the lives of ordinary people.
And all this despite the fact that the Communist Party has its own very significant experience. As you know, on March 15, 1996, the lower house, at the suggestion of Zyuganovites, despite Yeltsin’s warnings, adopted a resolution according to which the decision of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR of December 12, 1991 to denounce the Treaty on the Formation of the USSR was recognized as invalid. From this day on, the USSR was considered restored. But Yeltsin ignored this decision, telling reporters that at his order the ambassadors of the CIS countries were gathered, who were explained that this decision of the State Duma would have no consequences. So ingloriously ended the demagogic attempt of the false communists.
It should be noted that many Russians have not trusted Zyuganov for a long time, since he failed them in the same 1996, when, having gained the majority of votes in the presidential election, he transferred victory to Yeltsin without a fight.
Vasily Zelikov
Minsk city
OBJECTIVE VIEW OF SOCIALISM AND SOVIET POWER
In the newspaper of the Union of the struggle for national sobriety (SBNT) "Comrade" No. 9 (205) - October-November 2013, an article was published under the heading "Robbery strategy. Failing weapon of the enemy. " The source is indicated at the end of the article - DESNITSA newspaper, No. 4 (14), 2000 (Moscow). Thus, this article was written 20 years ago. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to reproduce it today, these days.
Its author is Fedor Grigorievich Uglov (1904-2008), an outstanding surgeon of our time (a student of an outstanding Russian doctor N.N. Petrov), doctor of medical sciences, professor of I.P. St. Petersburg University Pavlova, Honorary Chairman of the St. Petersburg Society of Surgeons, full member of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, International Slavic Academy, Petrovsky Academy of Sciences and Arts, editor-in-chief (from 1953 to 2006) of the journal “Herald of Surgery”, member of the Union of Writers of Russia, sober lifestyle advocate , laureate of the Lenin Prize.
A. Shpagin
The mass media, being in the hands of people alien to Russia and its indigenous population, are climbing over their heads to represent our country and our life under Soviet rule in black colors.
As an active participant in this life from the age of 13 and throughout the entire period of the existence of Soviet power, as a person who has never participated in any power structures, I can quite objectively and impartially say what our life was like, and everyone can compare it with what it has become in the last ten years for a Russian person who is not participating in the new power structures.
I’ll tell you about the state of health and human longevity under Soviet rule. I think this side of human life and society best describes the social system.
I will give for comparison statistical data on Sweden, where they were well recorded (these indicators are typical for most European states with a capitalist system).
In 1755, in Sweden, the average life expectancy was 34 years (previously it was much lower); in 1816–40 (i.e. after 60 years) - 41 years; in 1911–20 (i.e. after another 95 years) - 57 years; in 1945-50 - 68 years old.
A similar situation in the USA: 1800 - 33 years; 1850 - 42 years; 1900 - 49 years; 1950 - 68 years.
Now the data for Russia. If in 1896–97. in European Russia (in which serfdom was abolished only 40 years before - February 19, 1861), the average life expectancy was 32 years (and even less with the outskirts, inhabited mainly by ethnic minorities), already in 1926 –27 years she grew up to 44 years old (for men 42 years old, for women under 47 years old). By this time, illiteracy was eliminated in the country and education compulsory for all was introduced. In 1955–56 the average life expectancy was already 67 years (63 years for men and 69 years for women). Thus, over 50 years, the average life expectancy has doubled. In 1970–76 life expectancy for men was 65 years, for women 74 years.
Thus, Russia during the Soviet era, in matters of increasing life expectancy in 50-60 years, has come the way in which the capitalist countries took 150-200 years.
This is only one of the indicators of governing the country and caring for a person. Of course, this does not exhaust the achievements of Soviet power. Free treatment has been introduced, available at all levels. In health, the achievements of Soviet power were among the most outstanding in the world. This is the elimination of tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases, and a reduction of almost ten times the infant mortality rate, and much, much more.
The Soviet government introduced compulsory 7-year education in the country (and then secondary education), affordable and free higher education with scholarships for students.
The rapid development of science began. In addition to numerous universities, in which, along with teaching, a lot of scientific work was carried out, numerous research institutes were created in all the most important fields of science. Under Soviet rule, we were the first in the world to go into space. But the most important thing is that in a historically short period, Russia has turned from a backward semi-illiterate country (before the revolution there were 90% of illiterates) into a country of universal literacy. An army was created - the strongest in the world. For 10-12 years, the armament of the army was created, which could withstand the weapons assembled and created almost throughout Europe. Is it necessary to compare all these achievements of Soviet power, verified by history, with those "achievements" that the "democrats" achieved for their almost ten-year rule of the country? What did they turn our country into, our army? Having plundered the whole nation, they enriched a handful of criminals who, having taken seats in the government and put their bribed bullies in all the media, "rubbed points" to the world, talking about their "reforms." They turned the richest country with a prosperous population into separate pieces of individual "princes"in “with the impoverished multimillion people in almost all the“ principalities ”- and the few who are fattening from the looted wealth, who, with the help of the media created in their own image, fool the people every day, trying to achieve its humility.
And so that people do not remember the Soviet power, which from the standpoint of their present life is a paradise on earth, they are trying in every possible way to slander it. But the more their “voices” lie, the clearer the true face of the Soviet power appears and the more the desire to return to it again grows.
Understanding perfectly how the life of most people has changed dramatically for the worse with the advent of the "reformers", the ruling mafia, in order to drown people's memory and poison them, began to solder the people at a frantic pace, not only opening all internal alcohol gateways, but also giving complete freedom to all foreign solders turn our country into an alcoholic sea.
Under the “reformers,” the level of alcohol consumption went up steeply, reaching catastrophic proportions unprecedented in world history.
Children's homelessness has sharply grown (which was eliminated by the Soviet government within two or three years of the very first and difficult period of its existence).
What achievements can the "reformers" boast of?
It turns out that over the past ten years, the life expectancy of Russian people has decreased to 58-60 years (that is, 10 years) and continues to decline. The birth rate decreased by 2–3 times, the mortality rate increased sharply, exceeding the birth rate by 1–1.5 million people per year. During the "reforms" we have already lost at least 10 million people.
Chubais chose alcohol as the main weapon for the destruction of Russian people - the most powerful and reliable.
Under Soviet rule, alcohol consumption ranged from zero (over 11 years) to 7–8 liters recently per capita per year. Under the "reformers" it reached the limit of 25 liters per capita per year. In its entire thousand-year history, Russia did not have such a level!
But the "reformers" alcohol genocide seemed insufficient weapons against the Russian people. They opened all the doors to illegal drugs, directing their deadly blow to youth and adolescents. Now, according to unofficial data (official sources are silent, as they got water in their mouths), almost 40% of drug addicts among young people and teenagers! But it is known that for a person it is enough for several years to “generation” for a sad end.
Enemies of the Russian people can rub their hands in pleasure. According to Dulles’s plan, an additional lethal weapon is aimed at Russian youth, aimed at our teenagers, which will complete what the Gaidar-Chubais and others like them started.
Having ravaged the country, drowned out the people, killed teachers and doctors, raised the prices of medicines to lawlessness, they celebrate their Pyrrhic victory.
A few years ago I made a report among the workers of Severodvinsk. Speaking about the increasing level of alcohol consumption, I said that the enemies of Russia deliberately solder the Russian people. Someone from the audience asked defiantly: "Where do you see these enemies? Why do not we see them?" Now I would like to ask this person a question: "Does he really not see the enemies who solder Russian people today?"
P.S. Sometimes you can hear surprise from the girls, why now guys, men went some kind of weak, frail? But where do strong, healthy guys, men come from (they don’t fall out of the sky!) If the girls themselves first smoke, drink, take drugs, disfigure their beautiful bodies with completely harmless tattoos, piercings, and then give birth to babies with all the consequences ...
That is why girls are given “privileges” in nightclubs: free admission, “spill”, where, in addition to alcohol, drugs are mixed in; after drinking such “drinks” with girls, you can do whatever you want ...
Close to this is such a "picture" of capitalism as juvenile delinquency. According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs alone, in 2019, 37,953 offenders under the age of majority were identified, they accounted for 3.9% of all solved crimes in Russia last year. Moreover, the number of grave and especially grave crimes by minors is growing: if in 2018 there were 9716, then in 2019 - 10 113. The statistics also recorded 1615 cases of involving minors in criminal activity.
The Republic of Tuva is the record holder for juvenile delinquency, where juveniles are involved in almost every 10th solved crime. Next comes Karelia with 7.2% of the total number of crimes uncovered. Then follow the Sverdlovsk region, the Nenets Autonomous Okrug and the Trans-Baikal Territory. The top ten “winners” are Volgograd Oblast and Primorsky Krai. Child crime has become a problem in the Pskov, Novgorod, Ivanovo and Amur regions.
All this is politics, the class struggle of the capitalists against the working class, against the working people. Only socialism and soviet power can put an end to all this!
A. Shpagin (VMGB)
Address by the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the AUCPB to the working people of Russia
The next bourgeois version of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, securing the dominance of big capital and the exploitation of Russian workers, should be rejected
President of the Russian Federation V. Putin announced amendments to the main law of the state - the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation.
It was adopted at the end of the year (December 12) as a result of tank shots rumbled in Moscow on October 3-4, 1993. Then President B. Yeltsin dispersed the Supreme Council of Russia and shot his defenders, thereby making a coup. The 1993 Constitution was imposed on the people of Russia by force. The proposed revision of the 2020 Constitution preserves the essence, the main content of the Constitution on the blood of 1993. It was adopted in the interests of large Russian capital in order to push through reforms with the help of accelerated methods. Under this Constitution, authoritarian presidential power was introduced, which gave the president the right to form a government and dissolve parliament (State Duma). The role of parliament, in fact, is reduced to decoration: any law adopted by the State Duma is subject to approval by the "upper house" - the Federation Council - and the president, who may reject the adopted laws. Finally, the president has the right to issue his own decrees, which have the same force as laws.
The basic law of the state, providing for the dictatorial powers of the president, is typical for those capitalist countries where power is unstable and the lack of democratic support is replaced by a strong police regime. Similar "constitutions" can be found in Latin America during periods of military dictatorships, when the "constitution" is nothing more than a fig leaf. An authoritarian power scheme was also, for example, in France during the time of General de Gaulle: this power was established when the French regime "staggered" and the bourgeoisie needed to strengthen it.
The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation was designed to protect bourgeois power, regardless of which parties would be elected to the State Duma. By inheritance, it (the Constitution) passed from Yeltsin to Putin.
The current constitutional amendments are intended to give the appearance of legality to preserving the power of President Putin, who has been at the head of the country for twenty years. It is supposed to change the form of power in Russia so that Putin remains its sovereign leader, and the political regime itself does not change its essence.
The main innovation will be the emergence of another authority - the State Council. The formula, when the president becomes the chairman of a certain high “Council”, has already been successfully tested in Kazakhstan - there N. Nazarbayev moved from one high chair to another.
Moreover, in Russia, the parliament is promised a slight expansion of rights. According to the amendments, the State Duma will be able to vote not only “for” or “against” the new Prime Minister, but also on the candidatures of some of the ministers. However, the powers of the president, formally reduced in favor of the parliament, are expanding elsewhere: now he will receive the right to initiate the dismissal of the chairmen of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts.
It is obvious that within the ruling authorities there is still a struggle of groups for a new look of the Constitution, and amendments are born in this struggle - hence the contradictions in them. One of the leading political scientists suggested that different amendments were written by different groups of people who did not coordinate them with each other. For the sake of masking the main perturbations, it is proposed to add to the basic law such moments as indexation of pensions for pensioners and the minimum wage corresponding to the minimum subsistence level (which looks shameful, but is presented as some good). Someone else jokingly proposed to add to the Constitution that “the weather should be good”, “the right of people to breathe,” etc. Various lobbyists began to compose their own amendments in order to strengthen their influence: for example, the Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kirill suggested mention “God” in the Constitution, and Cossack chieftains proposed the introduction of “Cossack police”. Etc…
But the jokes aside.
Regardless of who specifically becomes the head of state, which body will be added a little more authority, and which one will be slightly reduced, the 2020 Constitution of the Russian Federation, with the introduction of cosmetic amendments to the 1993 Constitution, does not change its essence. This is a bourgeois document that substantiates the power of the capitalists in the country and the lack of rights of the masses of working people with pompous words.
New formulas retain authoritarian, dictatorial forms of government, based primarily on the police force. In Russia, in fact, there is no parliament and parties, even in the form in which they are supposed in bourgeois-democratic states, and the entire system of power is subordinated to the interests of oligarchic groups.
The balance of power between capital and the masses can be changed only as a result of the revolutionary struggle of the working masses for their rights and interests - for socialism. No hope for a “parliamentary republic" or a "good president" is real.
For this reason, conscious workers should not participate but boycott hypocritical attempts by
the current government to draw them into empty "discussions" and "votes" around all sorts of decorative amendments to the bourgeois constitution. Conscious workers should understand that all this fuss was created by liberals to slyly give the “new” Constitution of the Russian Federation hostile to the people the ephemeral status of “popular approval” (“expression of will”). According to the statements of the supreme power of the Russian Federation, with the adoption of the "new" Constitution, there will be no change in the liberal course leading Russia into the abyss. The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation, dictated by Western puppeteers Yeltsin, cannot be “finalized” and presented to the people in the form of “improved”. The proposed "new" Constitution of the lack of rights of the people should be rejected.
February 17, 2020 Leningrad
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
THERE ARE NO DEEP INTEGRATION OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA ALTERNATIVES
To the President of the Republic of Belarus
Lukashenko Alexander Grigoryevich
To the President of the Russian Federation
Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich
Copy:
Secretary of State of the Union State of Belarus and Russia
Rapota Grigory Alekseevich
APPEAL
by left-patriotic public associations of Belarus, which formed the Coordination Council "Unity",
THERE ARE NO DEEP INTEGRATION OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA ALTERNATIVES
On December 8, 2019, the peoples of Belarus and Russia celebrated the 20th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State of Belarus and Russia. However, after two decades, the peoples of our countries regret to note that the Union State has not been fully created.
For 20 years, many articles of the signed Treaty have not been fulfilled: a truly unified economic space has not been created, there is no single monetary unit (currency) provided for in Article 13 of the Treaty, the uniform citizenship of the Union State has not been fully implemented so that every citizen has equal rights to any its parts, which was provided for by the Treaty on the Equal Rights of Citizens of December 25, 1998, there is no Constitutional Act. Even article 10 of the 1999 Treaty on the Symbols and Attributes of Statehood of the Union State was not implemented - the simplest thing that could be done.
Many people in Belarus and Russia hoped that in connection with the 20th anniversary, our leaders would finally take decisive measures to put the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State into action. But our hopes have not yet been realized. Despite the intensive Belarusian-Russian negotiations held in November-December 2019, the new year 2020 was met without clear agreements on integration, as well as the price of oil and gas and their supplies to Belarus.
Finally, at the recent talks between President of Belarus A. Lukashenko and President of Russia V. Putin in Sochi, some half-hearted decisions were reached regarding the supply of gas and oil to Belarus and their prices. But the main issue - the issue of deepening integration - was again postponed indefinitely, which makes us feel anxious and insecure about tomorrow.
Over the past 13 years, we have been witnessing how difficult Belarusian-Russian negotiations on energy supplies are going on at the end of each year. In addition, milk, sugar and other “wars” in mutual trade periodically break out.
Why it happens? The answer is obvious: because there is no single economic space in which the free movement of goods, services, capital, labor within the territories of the participating states is ensured. The lack of a single economic space is a brake on the path of union construction. For example, in the European Union there is no such degree of mutual contradictions in internal trade as in our Union, although outside the EU there is a fierce struggle in foreign trade, for example, between the EU and the USA, the EU and China. It was with a view to mutual benefit that the countries of the European Union came together, agreeing to supranational bodies with fairly broad powers.
The Treaty on the Creation of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, signed on December 8, 1999, is the document in which the most important issue of the formation of a single economic space has been taken into account. In our opinion, with the full implementation of the Agreement, the issue of gas and oil prices can be resolved more simply not at the level of leaders of the participating states, but at the level of business entities (enterprises, firms, corporations, holdings, etc.). Other issues related to this issue specified in the Treaty are also thoroughly thought out, for example, the issue of creating supranational bodies of the Union State.
Moreover, for critics of the Treaty, it should be emphasized that the creation of supranational bodies and the voluntary delegation of authority to the Union State does not at all lead to the loss of sovereignty. Article 6 of the Treaty clearly states: “Each state party shall retain, taking into account the powers voluntarily transferred to the Union State, sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, state structure, Constitution, state flag, coat of arms and other attributes of statehood.” In addition, article 37 (paragraph 1) of the Treaty says: “Acts of the Supreme State Council are adopted on the basis of unanimity of the participating states. An act is not adopted if one of the participating states opposes its adoption ”(The European Union has a similar principle of consensus in decision-making).
Independence is now widely spoken in Belarus. For those supporters of independence for whom the above arguments are unconvincing, we draw attention to the fact that in the present world almost all countries are interdependent from each other, even such a powerful state as the United States, as recent events have shown, depends on economic EU and China policy. At the same time, the advantages of large state and interstate entities under conditions of global economic instability are obvious, and world practice confirms: the higher the degree of integration of states, the more effective their union. Therefore, our public associations advocate sovereignty within the Union State, and not outside the Union of Belarus and Russia.
Tearing is not beneficial to either Belarusians or Russians, it destabilizes our economy and annoys ordinary people who say: "Pans are fighting, but forefathers are cracking at the lackeys." Then the question arises: who benefits from the disagreement between Belarus and Russia? The answer to this question was given in December 2012 by former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who announced her intention to oppose the integration process in the territory of the former USSR.
However, our public associations are not at all limited to the economic benefits of creating the Union State of Belarus and Russia. In addition, there are political and military reasons requiring the unification of our states. As you know, the desire of the Belarusian people to unite with Russia was expressed twice: at the All-Union referendum on March 17, 1991, at which 82.7% of the inhabitants of the BSSR supported the preservation of a single state, and the republican referendum on May 14, 1995, at which 83.3% citizens of the Republic of Belarus voted in favor of the issue of integration with the Russian Federation.
We, Belarusians and Russians, have common roots, a common history, a common destiny, together our ancestors, who had a common self-name "Rusyns", i.e. "Russians", fought against foreign invaders. The divide and conquer policy is not new, it has been used since the time of the Roman Empire, and in the execution of the modern West in relation to the post-Soviet republics it is implemented in the form of “color revolutions”, as a result of which these republics are completely dependent on Western countries. The results of such a “revolution” turned out to be especially tragic for Ukraine, where a coup d'etat was carried out under the dictation of Western intelligence services. As a result, the power was seized by the Neo-Bandera, who unleashed a civil war and pursue a neo-fascist policy. With regard to the fraternal Ukrainian people, the main goal of the West has been successfully realized so far - the separation of Ukraine from Russia, which corresponds to the dreams of German Chancellor Bismarck "to oppose Ukraine to Russia, to pit two parts of a single people and watch how the brother will kill his brother."
Our public associations strongly oppose the implementation of the Ukrainian scenario in Belarus. Belarus is now the last bastion on the path of expansion of the West.
Unfortunately, in this harsh time, when, contrary to the assurances of the leaders of the Western countries, not to advance NATO forces to the east, their military contingents have already been deployed on the borders of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, the military danger against our peoples is growing. The situation is aggravated by the fact that the United States announced its withdrawal from the INF Treaty and its intention not to extend the START-3 treaty. Thus, the increasing military danger requires accelerating the unification of the resources of Belarus and Russia.
In connection with the 75th anniversary of the Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War, we propose that our media cover as fully as possible that the Victory was won thanks to the unity and friendship of all the peoples of the Soviet Union. We support the positive response of the President of the Republic of Belarus A. Lukashenko to the invitation of the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin to visit the Victory Parade, which will be held in Moscow on May 9.
We support the processions of the “Immortal Regiment” on May 9th, which are the popular action of our COMMON MEMORY about the Victory and those thanks to whom it was won. The “Immortal Regiment” campaign has become international in recent years and covers 110 countries of the world, unites people in the fight against war and neo-fascism.
We, the leaders of the left-wing patriotic public associations of Belarus, which formed the Coordination Council "UNITY", appeal to you, Alexander Grigoryevich and Vladimir Vladimirovich, with an appeal:
Show your political will and, in accordance with the Treaty of December 8, 1999, begin the full implementation of the unification of our countries into a single Union State with a functioning single leadership. In this case, clear terms of association should be determined. Full implementation of the Treaty will make the Union State attractive for other states to join it. Further delay the process of creating the Union State is unacceptable.
By implementing the Agreement, signed more than 20 years ago, you will go down in history as unifiers. Currently, throughout the territory of the former USSR, people curse the destroyers of the Great Power, of which they were proud.
Make a possible impact on state-owned media so that they exaggerate as little as possible around the relations between Belarus and Russia and stop attacking each other. Our peoples are not at all interested in trade showdowns and competitions who outwit whom, they need real
things to improve their lives and ensure security, as well as peace and friendship.
There is no alternative to the deep integration of Belarus and Russia.
TOGETHER WE ARE STRONGER!
The leaders of the left-patriotic public associations of Belarus, which formed the Coordination Council "UNITY":
B. B. ZELIKOV, Chairman of the Republican Civil Committee of the Patriotic Public Association "Fatherland"
V.V. DRACO, Chairman of the Republican Council of the public association "For Democracy, Social Progress and Justice",
deputy of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
L.E. SHKOLNIKOV, Secretary-Coordinator of the Republican Public Association "For the Union and the Communist Party
Union "
G.I. SIMANOVSKY, Secretary of the Coordinating Council
left-patriotic associations of Belarus "UNITY"
Minsk, 02.20.2020
=========================================
Lukashenko Alexander Grigoryevich
To the President of the Russian Federation
Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich
Copy:
Secretary of State of the Union State of Belarus and Russia
Rapota Grigory Alekseevich
APPEAL
by left-patriotic public associations of Belarus, which formed the Coordination Council "Unity",
THERE ARE NO DEEP INTEGRATION OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA ALTERNATIVES
On December 8, 2019, the peoples of Belarus and Russia celebrated the 20th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State of Belarus and Russia. However, after two decades, the peoples of our countries regret to note that the Union State has not been fully created.
For 20 years, many articles of the signed Treaty have not been fulfilled: a truly unified economic space has not been created, there is no single monetary unit (currency) provided for in Article 13 of the Treaty, the uniform citizenship of the Union State has not been fully implemented so that every citizen has equal rights to any its parts, which was provided for by the Treaty on the Equal Rights of Citizens of December 25, 1998, there is no Constitutional Act. Even article 10 of the 1999 Treaty on the Symbols and Attributes of Statehood of the Union State was not implemented - the simplest thing that could be done.
Many people in Belarus and Russia hoped that in connection with the 20th anniversary, our leaders would finally take decisive measures to put the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State into action. But our hopes have not yet been realized. Despite the intensive Belarusian-Russian negotiations held in November-December 2019, the new year 2020 was met without clear agreements on integration, as well as the price of oil and gas and their supplies to Belarus.
Finally, at the recent talks between President of Belarus A. Lukashenko and President of Russia V. Putin in Sochi, some half-hearted decisions were reached regarding the supply of gas and oil to Belarus and their prices. But the main issue - the issue of deepening integration - was again postponed indefinitely, which makes us feel anxious and insecure about tomorrow.
Over the past 13 years, we have been witnessing how difficult Belarusian-Russian negotiations on energy supplies are going on at the end of each year. In addition, milk, sugar and other “wars” in mutual trade periodically break out.
Why it happens? The answer is obvious: because there is no single economic space in which the free movement of goods, services, capital, labor within the territories of the participating states is ensured. The lack of a single economic space is a brake on the path of union construction. For example, in the European Union there is no such degree of mutual contradictions in internal trade as in our Union, although outside the EU there is a fierce struggle in foreign trade, for example, between the EU and the USA, the EU and China. It was with a view to mutual benefit that the countries of the European Union came together, agreeing to supranational bodies with fairly broad powers.
The Treaty on the Creation of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, signed on December 8, 1999, is the document in which the most important issue of the formation of a single economic space has been taken into account. In our opinion, with the full implementation of the Agreement, the issue of gas and oil prices can be resolved more simply not at the level of leaders of the participating states, but at the level of business entities (enterprises, firms, corporations, holdings, etc.). Other issues related to this issue specified in the Treaty are also thoroughly thought out, for example, the issue of creating supranational bodies of the Union State.
Moreover, for critics of the Treaty, it should be emphasized that the creation of supranational bodies and the voluntary delegation of authority to the Union State does not at all lead to the loss of sovereignty. Article 6 of the Treaty clearly states: “Each state party shall retain, taking into account the powers voluntarily transferred to the Union State, sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, state structure, Constitution, state flag, coat of arms and other attributes of statehood.” In addition, article 37 (paragraph 1) of the Treaty says: “Acts of the Supreme State Council are adopted on the basis of unanimity of the participating states. An act is not adopted if one of the participating states opposes its adoption ”(The European Union has a similar principle of consensus in decision-making).
Independence is now widely spoken in Belarus. For those supporters of independence for whom the above arguments are unconvincing, we draw attention to the fact that in the present world almost all countries are interdependent from each other, even such a powerful state as the United States, as recent events have shown, depends on economic EU and China policy. At the same time, the advantages of large state and interstate entities under conditions of global economic instability are obvious, and world practice confirms: the higher the degree of integration of states, the more effective their union. Therefore, our public associations advocate sovereignty within the Union State, and not outside the Union of Belarus and Russia.
Tearing is not beneficial to either Belarusians or Russians, it destabilizes our economy and annoys ordinary people who say: "Pans are fighting, but forefathers are cracking at the lackeys." Then the question arises: who benefits from the disagreement between Belarus and Russia? The answer to this question was given in December 2012 by former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who announced her intention to oppose the integration process in the territory of the former USSR.
However, our public associations are not at all limited to the economic benefits of creating the Union State of Belarus and Russia. In addition, there are political and military reasons requiring the unification of our states. As you know, the desire of the Belarusian people to unite with Russia was expressed twice: at the All-Union referendum on March 17, 1991, at which 82.7% of the inhabitants of the BSSR supported the preservation of a single state, and the republican referendum on May 14, 1995, at which 83.3% citizens of the Republic of Belarus voted in favor of the issue of integration with the Russian Federation.
We, Belarusians and Russians, have common roots, a common history, a common destiny, together our ancestors, who had a common self-name "Rusyns", i.e. "Russians", fought against foreign invaders. The divide and conquer policy is not new, it has been used since the time of the Roman Empire, and in the execution of the modern West in relation to the post-Soviet republics it is implemented in the form of “color revolutions”, as a result of which these republics are completely dependent on Western countries. The results of such a “revolution” turned out to be especially tragic for Ukraine, where a coup d'etat was carried out under the dictation of Western intelligence services. As a result, the power was seized by the Neo-Bandera, who unleashed a civil war and pursue a neo-fascist policy. With regard to the fraternal Ukrainian people, the main goal of the West has been successfully realized so far - the separation of Ukraine from Russia, which corresponds to the dreams of German Chancellor Bismarck "to oppose Ukraine to Russia, to pit two parts of a single people and watch how the brother will kill his brother."
Our public associations strongly oppose the implementation of the Ukrainian scenario in Belarus. Belarus is now the last bastion on the path of expansion of the West.
Unfortunately, in this harsh time, when, contrary to the assurances of the leaders of the Western countries, not to advance NATO forces to the east, their military contingents have already been deployed on the borders of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, the military danger against our peoples is growing. The situation is aggravated by the fact that the United States announced its withdrawal from the INF Treaty and its intention not to extend the START-3 treaty. Thus, the increasing military danger requires accelerating the unification of the resources of Belarus and Russia.
In connection with the 75th anniversary of the Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War, we propose that our media cover as fully as possible that the Victory was won thanks to the unity and friendship of all the peoples of the Soviet Union. We support the positive response of the President of the Republic of Belarus A. Lukashenko to the invitation of the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin to visit the Victory Parade, which will be held in Moscow on May 9.
We support the processions of the “Immortal Regiment” on May 9th, which are the popular action of our COMMON MEMORY about the Victory and those thanks to whom it was won. The “Immortal Regiment” campaign has become international in recent years and covers 110 countries of the world, unites people in the fight against war and neo-fascism.
We, the leaders of the left-wing patriotic public associations of Belarus, which formed the Coordination Council "UNITY", appeal to you, Alexander Grigoryevich and Vladimir Vladimirovich, with an appeal:
Show your political will and, in accordance with the Treaty of December 8, 1999, begin the full implementation of the unification of our countries into a single Union State with a functioning single leadership. In this case, clear terms of association should be determined. Full implementation of the Treaty will make the Union State attractive for other states to join it. Further delay the process of creating the Union State is unacceptable.
By implementing the Agreement, signed more than 20 years ago, you will go down in history as unifiers. Currently, throughout the territory of the former USSR, people curse the destroyers of the Great Power, of which they were proud.
Make a possible impact on state-owned media so that they exaggerate as little as possible around the relations between Belarus and Russia and stop attacking each other. Our peoples are not at all interested in trade showdowns and competitions who outwit whom, they need real
things to improve their lives and ensure security, as well as peace and friendship.
There is no alternative to the deep integration of Belarus and Russia.
TOGETHER WE ARE STRONGER!
The leaders of the left-patriotic public associations of Belarus, which formed the Coordination Council "UNITY":
B. B. ZELIKOV, Chairman of the Republican Civil Committee of the Patriotic Public Association "Fatherland"
V.V. DRACO, Chairman of the Republican Council of the public association "For Democracy, Social Progress and Justice",
deputy of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
L.E. SHKOLNIKOV, Secretary-Coordinator of the Republican Public Association "For the Union and the Communist Party
Union "
G.I. SIMANOVSKY, Secretary of the Coordinating Council
left-patriotic associations of Belarus "UNITY"
Minsk, 02.20.2020
=========================================
On the 102nd anniversary of the creation of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army and Red Navy
Dear comrades, war and labor veterans of the Great Patriotic War of the Soviet people against fascist Germany, citizens of the Soviet period of history! Comrade servicemen of the Soviet Army and all those who today consider themselves citizens of the Soviet Union!
The Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks congratulates you on the 102nd anniversary of the creation of an invincible and legendary battle that has recognized the joy of the victories of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army and the Red Navy! We wish you good health, happiness and longevity!
The defeat of the Germans near Pskov and Narva on February 23, 1918 was the birthday of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army and Red Navy.
The Red Army defeated the troops of 14 states of the Entente and the White Guards and thereby saved Soviet Russia from destruction.
Guided by I.V. By Stalin, the CPSU (b) inspired and organized Soviet people to build socialism and turned backward, illiterate Russia into a powerful industrial power. Since the alarming 30s, the name of I.V. Stalin - a faithful follower of the case V.I. Lenin - for many generations of Soviet people became the personification of social justice and national pride.
The victory of the Soviet people over Nazi Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. saved the peoples of the USSR from fascist slavery and helped the peoples of Europe to cast off the Nazi yoke, save many nations from complete extermination.
On May 9, 2020, we Soviet people will celebrate the 75th anniversary of the victory of the Soviet people over fascist Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.
We will celebrate the 75th anniversary of Victory with the name of the leader and organizer of the victories of the Soviet people, Generalissimo of the USSR Comrade Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin.
Stalin united Soviet people of different nationalities, different languages and religions in one fit - in the defense of the Socialist Fatherland, inspired them with the idea of higher Soviet patriotism.
In Moscow on Red Square along the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin passed the historical two military parades of the Red Army: November 7, 1941 and June 24, 1945
I.V. Stalin from the Mausoleum of V.I. On November 7, 1941, Lenin called on the troops of the Red Army to defeat the troops of fascist Germany and instilled in them faith in the coming mandatory victory over the enemy. June 24, 1945 at the Victory Parade at the foot of the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin, the Red Army threw 200 banners and standards of the troops of defeated Nazi Germany. The symbols of the Nazis were then burned.
Mausoleum V.I. Lenin on Red Square in Moscow, the red banner with a sickle and a hammer, the State Emblem of the USSR are the main symbols of the Soviet Union and the glorious Soviet era.
Drapery with plywood shields of the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin "in the days of people's triumphs and tribulations" is perceived in reality as an absurd recognition by Russia of what the bourgeois propaganda of the West and Russian liberals are now imposing on us aggressively - it was not the USSR that defeated the Hitler hordes, but the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition that entered the war only in 1944 after the Soviet troops, having crossed the border of the USSR, liberated the countries of Europe, when the outcome of the war was finally decided thanks to the actions of the USSR Red Army.
There is no Mausoleum V.I. Lenin - there is no Victory of the Soviet people over fascist Germany on May 9, 1945
There is no Mausoleum V.I. Lenin - there is not the most shameful for the German aggressor symbolic fact of the overthrow on June 24, 1945 of 200 fascist banners and standards precisely at the foot of the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin.
The current government of Russia constantly in all statements about the Second World War avoids answering the question: who, in fact, won, under whose leadership and over whom in the Great Patriotic War, and in the Second World War? Everyone in the world knows that Nazi Germany was defeated by the Soviet people, led by Supreme Commander-in-Chief Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, and won under the red banner with a hammer and sickle, with the Bolshevik Communists who were the first to attack.
Putin has recently called for the truth about the war. So why is he hiding from people on May 9 the Mausoleum on Red Square - a symbol of this Victory?
The Russian authorities are cunning when they are outraged by the demolition of Soviet-era monuments and liberating soldiers in Europe. First of all, the Russian authorities themselves should return the monuments of the Soviet era to their former places and return the cities to their former, Soviet names. And above all, this must be done for the monuments of I.V. Stalin and return the name to the cities of Stalingrad and Leningrad.
Russian authorities! Do not continue to shame in front of the whole world, bashfully hiding under the plywood for the sake of the unfriendly West to us. Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin!
We are against the reburial of V.I. Lenin from the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin on Red Square in Moscow is the historical great symbol of Russia of the Soviet era.
The monuments of the Soviet era were not created by you, the liberals, but by the people, and not by you, the liberals, to destroy them.
There is no Mausoleum on Red Square (it is hidden behind plywood shields), which means there is no Victory either. Then WHAT and WHOSE victory will we celebrate on May 9, 2020?
Politically, this is a conscious desovetization of Victory Day!
Glory to I.V. Stalin - to the leader and organizer of the victories of the Red Army!
The Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks congratulates you on the 102nd anniversary of the creation of an invincible and legendary battle that has recognized the joy of the victories of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army and the Red Navy! We wish you good health, happiness and longevity!
The defeat of the Germans near Pskov and Narva on February 23, 1918 was the birthday of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army and Red Navy.
The Red Army defeated the troops of 14 states of the Entente and the White Guards and thereby saved Soviet Russia from destruction.
Guided by I.V. By Stalin, the CPSU (b) inspired and organized Soviet people to build socialism and turned backward, illiterate Russia into a powerful industrial power. Since the alarming 30s, the name of I.V. Stalin - a faithful follower of the case V.I. Lenin - for many generations of Soviet people became the personification of social justice and national pride.
The victory of the Soviet people over Nazi Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. saved the peoples of the USSR from fascist slavery and helped the peoples of Europe to cast off the Nazi yoke, save many nations from complete extermination.
On May 9, 2020, we Soviet people will celebrate the 75th anniversary of the victory of the Soviet people over fascist Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.
We will celebrate the 75th anniversary of Victory with the name of the leader and organizer of the victories of the Soviet people, Generalissimo of the USSR Comrade Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin.
Stalin united Soviet people of different nationalities, different languages and religions in one fit - in the defense of the Socialist Fatherland, inspired them with the idea of higher Soviet patriotism.
In Moscow on Red Square along the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin passed the historical two military parades of the Red Army: November 7, 1941 and June 24, 1945
I.V. Stalin from the Mausoleum of V.I. On November 7, 1941, Lenin called on the troops of the Red Army to defeat the troops of fascist Germany and instilled in them faith in the coming mandatory victory over the enemy. June 24, 1945 at the Victory Parade at the foot of the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin, the Red Army threw 200 banners and standards of the troops of defeated Nazi Germany. The symbols of the Nazis were then burned.
Mausoleum V.I. Lenin on Red Square in Moscow, the red banner with a sickle and a hammer, the State Emblem of the USSR are the main symbols of the Soviet Union and the glorious Soviet era.
Drapery with plywood shields of the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin "in the days of people's triumphs and tribulations" is perceived in reality as an absurd recognition by Russia of what the bourgeois propaganda of the West and Russian liberals are now imposing on us aggressively - it was not the USSR that defeated the Hitler hordes, but the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition that entered the war only in 1944 after the Soviet troops, having crossed the border of the USSR, liberated the countries of Europe, when the outcome of the war was finally decided thanks to the actions of the USSR Red Army.
There is no Mausoleum V.I. Lenin - there is no Victory of the Soviet people over fascist Germany on May 9, 1945
There is no Mausoleum V.I. Lenin - there is not the most shameful for the German aggressor symbolic fact of the overthrow on June 24, 1945 of 200 fascist banners and standards precisely at the foot of the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin.
The current government of Russia constantly in all statements about the Second World War avoids answering the question: who, in fact, won, under whose leadership and over whom in the Great Patriotic War, and in the Second World War? Everyone in the world knows that Nazi Germany was defeated by the Soviet people, led by Supreme Commander-in-Chief Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, and won under the red banner with a hammer and sickle, with the Bolshevik Communists who were the first to attack.
Putin has recently called for the truth about the war. So why is he hiding from people on May 9 the Mausoleum on Red Square - a symbol of this Victory?
The Russian authorities are cunning when they are outraged by the demolition of Soviet-era monuments and liberating soldiers in Europe. First of all, the Russian authorities themselves should return the monuments of the Soviet era to their former places and return the cities to their former, Soviet names. And above all, this must be done for the monuments of I.V. Stalin and return the name to the cities of Stalingrad and Leningrad.
Russian authorities! Do not continue to shame in front of the whole world, bashfully hiding under the plywood for the sake of the unfriendly West to us. Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin!
We are against the reburial of V.I. Lenin from the Mausoleum of V.I. Lenin on Red Square in Moscow is the historical great symbol of Russia of the Soviet era.
The monuments of the Soviet era were not created by you, the liberals, but by the people, and not by you, the liberals, to destroy them.
There is no Mausoleum on Red Square (it is hidden behind plywood shields), which means there is no Victory either. Then WHAT and WHOSE victory will we celebrate on May 9, 2020?
Politically, this is a conscious desovetization of Victory Day!
Glory to I.V. Stalin - to the leader and organizer of the victories of the Red Army!
Monday, February 17, 2020
February 6 would have been 78 years since the birth of Kim Jong Il
On February 16, the DPRK celebrates a commemorative date - 78 years (1942) from the birth of Comrade Kim Jong Il - the eternal -General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea, the Great Leader of the DPRK, the Supreme Commander of the Korean People’s Army, the Chairman of the State Defense Committee of the DPRK, the son of the great Leader of the Comrade Kim Il Sung, Generalissimo (2012, posthumous). Comrade Kim Jong Il had a large number of awards and titles from around the world.
Comrade Kim Jong Il was a talented political, state, party and military leader, ideologist and leader of the Korean Labor Party, who developed the theoretical designs of Kim Il Sung before the theory and practice of socialist construction of Juche socialism in the DPRK. Unlike the Great Leader, comrade Kim Il Sung, who considered the Juche ideological principles created by him as a political science based on the theory of Marxism-Leninism, comrade Kim Jong Il in his theoretical writings (and his successor comrade Kim Jong-un) regarded Juche as an original original theory not related to Marxism-Leninism. Note that the three main postulates of the Juche theory - independence, independence, self-reliance - were basic in the construction of Soviet statehood I.V. Stalin since the creation of the USSR in December 1922 and throughout the history of the Stalinist period of the functioning of the USSR. I.V. Stalin, as you know, was an outstanding personality, a major theoretician of Marxism-Leninism, who developed the teachings of the founders of the theory under the conditions of victory and successful construction of socialism in the USSR. His theoretical works represented and now represent a huge contribution to the treasury of Marxism-Leninism, the study of which opens up broad prospects for the successful revolutionary struggle of the oppressed masses for their liberation from the oppression of imperialism. Theoretical works of I.V. Stalin is carefully studied throughout the world by everyone who is now fighting against modern fascist imperialism for socialism.
Under Kim Jong Il, the WPK set as a fundamental goal - to build a prosperous socialist state. Under the leadership of comrade Kim Jong Il, this task was successfully implemented. For the DPRK, which has a large shortage of acreage due to the mountainous landscape of the country, during the reign of Kim Jong Il, a grandiose reconstruction of all the territory possible for agricultural use was carried out, which made it possible to get rid of the need to import the main traditional food of the Koreans - rice. Now the country itself provides itself with this important agricultural product, which is very important in the face of constant, ever-tougher year-on-year comprehensive sanctions by the United States, seeking to strangle the DPRK with hunger.
Under Kim Jong Il, animal husbandry (goat farming), fish farming, and gardening (on the slopes of hills and mountains) were developed from scratch. Kim Il Sung dreamed that every Korean could have an apple every day for food. In general, the food program in the DPRK under Kim Jong Il was successfully resolved.
In the same years, the DPRK's energy problem was solved by building a mass of power plants on small rivers (there are no others in Korea), asphalt roads were built, railway communication between the leading cities of the country was developed. At the modern level, there are enterprises producing coal, minerals, gold, and uranium ores. Successful housing construction has been carried out in cities and rural areas with the provision of free, comfortable housing to everyone in need, especially young families. Great successes have been achieved in the field of medical services for the population in remote regions. High development has reached science and education. The entire youngest population of the country is fully provided with (naturally free) kindergartens and kindergartens. Thus, under Kim Jong Il, the organization of the life of the people in the DPRK was carried out at a very high level of amenities and welfare. In other words, the quality of life of Koreans in the city and in the countryside has significantly improved.
Constant threats from the United States to launch a preventive nuclear strike on the DPRK with the aim of overthrowing the socialist system in the country and killing the country's leader forced the DPRK to withdraw from the NPT (January 11, 2003) (the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - signed by the DPRK in 1985 under Kim Ir Sene) and actually engage in the creation of their own nuclear weapons - the only real means in the current context of confronting American gangster imperialism. According to the leaders of the DPRK, withdrawing from the NPT is "a legitimate measure of self-defense against the intentions of the United States to strangle the DPRK by force." The DPRK conducted its first underground nuclear test on October 9, 2006. In May 2010, North Korea announced successes in thermonuclear fusion and that the country could increase its nuclear warheads hundreds of times. On February 12, 2013, the DPRK successfully announcednuclear test. But this is already under Kim Jong-un. North Korea's nuclear program was developed under Kim Jong Il.
Under Kim Jong-un, an intercontinental ballistic missile was created capable of reaching the west coast of the United States ... This fact and subsequent tests of the DPRK of its weapons forced the United States to negotiate with Kim Jong-un, trying to trick him into nuclear disarmament from the DPRK. These negotiations, of course, did not lead to anything.
We, AUCPB, welcome the DPRK leadership’s peaceful policy aimed at increasing the well-being of the people and enhancing defense capabilities in the interest of peace in northeast Asia.
On a memorial day on February 16, we celebrate the enormous role of Comrade Kim Jong Il in achieving the successful construction of a prosperous independent socialist state of the DPRK. We wish the country of morning calm with new significant successes along this path under the leadership of its leader Comrade Kim Jong-un.
Central Committee of the AUCPB
Comrade Kim Jong Il was a talented political, state, party and military leader, ideologist and leader of the Korean Labor Party, who developed the theoretical designs of Kim Il Sung before the theory and practice of socialist construction of Juche socialism in the DPRK. Unlike the Great Leader, comrade Kim Il Sung, who considered the Juche ideological principles created by him as a political science based on the theory of Marxism-Leninism, comrade Kim Jong Il in his theoretical writings (and his successor comrade Kim Jong-un) regarded Juche as an original original theory not related to Marxism-Leninism. Note that the three main postulates of the Juche theory - independence, independence, self-reliance - were basic in the construction of Soviet statehood I.V. Stalin since the creation of the USSR in December 1922 and throughout the history of the Stalinist period of the functioning of the USSR. I.V. Stalin, as you know, was an outstanding personality, a major theoretician of Marxism-Leninism, who developed the teachings of the founders of the theory under the conditions of victory and successful construction of socialism in the USSR. His theoretical works represented and now represent a huge contribution to the treasury of Marxism-Leninism, the study of which opens up broad prospects for the successful revolutionary struggle of the oppressed masses for their liberation from the oppression of imperialism. Theoretical works of I.V. Stalin is carefully studied throughout the world by everyone who is now fighting against modern fascist imperialism for socialism.
Under Kim Jong Il, the WPK set as a fundamental goal - to build a prosperous socialist state. Under the leadership of comrade Kim Jong Il, this task was successfully implemented. For the DPRK, which has a large shortage of acreage due to the mountainous landscape of the country, during the reign of Kim Jong Il, a grandiose reconstruction of all the territory possible for agricultural use was carried out, which made it possible to get rid of the need to import the main traditional food of the Koreans - rice. Now the country itself provides itself with this important agricultural product, which is very important in the face of constant, ever-tougher year-on-year comprehensive sanctions by the United States, seeking to strangle the DPRK with hunger.
Under Kim Jong Il, animal husbandry (goat farming), fish farming, and gardening (on the slopes of hills and mountains) were developed from scratch. Kim Il Sung dreamed that every Korean could have an apple every day for food. In general, the food program in the DPRK under Kim Jong Il was successfully resolved.
In the same years, the DPRK's energy problem was solved by building a mass of power plants on small rivers (there are no others in Korea), asphalt roads were built, railway communication between the leading cities of the country was developed. At the modern level, there are enterprises producing coal, minerals, gold, and uranium ores. Successful housing construction has been carried out in cities and rural areas with the provision of free, comfortable housing to everyone in need, especially young families. Great successes have been achieved in the field of medical services for the population in remote regions. High development has reached science and education. The entire youngest population of the country is fully provided with (naturally free) kindergartens and kindergartens. Thus, under Kim Jong Il, the organization of the life of the people in the DPRK was carried out at a very high level of amenities and welfare. In other words, the quality of life of Koreans in the city and in the countryside has significantly improved.
Constant threats from the United States to launch a preventive nuclear strike on the DPRK with the aim of overthrowing the socialist system in the country and killing the country's leader forced the DPRK to withdraw from the NPT (January 11, 2003) (the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - signed by the DPRK in 1985 under Kim Ir Sene) and actually engage in the creation of their own nuclear weapons - the only real means in the current context of confronting American gangster imperialism. According to the leaders of the DPRK, withdrawing from the NPT is "a legitimate measure of self-defense against the intentions of the United States to strangle the DPRK by force." The DPRK conducted its first underground nuclear test on October 9, 2006. In May 2010, North Korea announced successes in thermonuclear fusion and that the country could increase its nuclear warheads hundreds of times. On February 12, 2013, the DPRK successfully announcednuclear test. But this is already under Kim Jong-un. North Korea's nuclear program was developed under Kim Jong Il.
Under Kim Jong-un, an intercontinental ballistic missile was created capable of reaching the west coast of the United States ... This fact and subsequent tests of the DPRK of its weapons forced the United States to negotiate with Kim Jong-un, trying to trick him into nuclear disarmament from the DPRK. These negotiations, of course, did not lead to anything.
We, AUCPB, welcome the DPRK leadership’s peaceful policy aimed at increasing the well-being of the people and enhancing defense capabilities in the interest of peace in northeast Asia.
On a memorial day on February 16, we celebrate the enormous role of Comrade Kim Jong Il in achieving the successful construction of a prosperous independent socialist state of the DPRK. We wish the country of morning calm with new significant successes along this path under the leadership of its leader Comrade Kim Jong-un.
Central Committee of the AUCPB
XX Congress of the CPSU - Congress of Traitors
In February 1956, the XX Congress of the CPSU was held. This congress can rightfully be called the "congress of traitors." At it, the first secretary Nikita Khrushchev read out his report “On the cult of personality and its consequences”, which laid the foundation for the blackening of I.V. Stalin.
The destructive consequences of Khrushchev’s whistle dance are hard to overestimate. The campaign of discrediting Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, whose name is associated with the construction of socialism, industrialization and collectivization, the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, at the same time meant blackening the entire history of the Soviet Union and socialism in principle.
“Stalin is trampled in order to get close to Lenin. And some are already starting Lenin, ”stated Vyacheslav Molotov, one of the“ Stalinist ”leaders of the Soviet state, on the eve of Perestroika, shortly before his death.
“Not a single enemy brought as much trouble as Khrushchev brought to us with his policy regarding the past of our party and the state, as well as towards Stalin,” admitted former Khrushchev’s comrade-in-arms, Marshal Dmitry Ustinov.
Many contemporaries said that it was from the 20th Congress, from the report “On the Cult of the Personality,” that people began to lose faith in Soviet communist ideals, which were now replaced by confusion in their heads.
What motivated Nikita Khrushchev when he wrote the “report”, what goals did he pursue, dousing the heroic period of building socialism in the USSR? Researchers point out that Khrushchev had “personal accounts” with Stalin: his son Leonid was captured during the war, went over to the Germans, but was then captured by Soviet intelligence and shot. However, Khrushchev found many friends and accomplices, including in the leadership of the CPSU, and this is not only a matter of personal accounts.
V.I. Lenin and I.V. Stalin warned that the danger to socialism is not only open enemies, but also hidden - for the time being - enemies. Among them are people with the psychology of a petty landlord, a tradesman, a layman who are hostile to the great struggle and the great transformations that socialism brings with it. Among these inhabitants was the peasant son Nikita Khrushchev, who joined the Communists in 1918. These inhabitants, including those who crawled into the Communist Party, did not want reprisals, were afraid of the class struggle, their ideal of “socialism” came down to a “quiet”, “peaceful” course of life. Therefore, during the time of Khrushchev, it was announced that the dictatorship of the proletariat was abandoned and replaced with a “nation-wide state”, and the Leninist-Stalinist position on the continuation and intensification of the class struggle during the construction of socialism was subjected to defamation. Khrushchevtsev was even scared of the Stalinist plan for the transformation of nature, and it was curtailed. They were scared even by the majestic Stalinist architecture, and they adopted the infamous decree "On eliminating excesses in design and construction." Finally, the pygmies, having reached the heights of party power, simply could not help but give a damn about the grave of the giant Stalin.
Khrushchev, relying on his supporters, in 1953 achieved the arrest and murder of Marshal Lavrentiy Beria. But, and becoming the first secretary of the Central Committee, he still did not have all the full power - while George Malenkov remained the chairman of the Council of Ministers. Khrushchev engaged in hardware intrigues, in 1955 Malenkov was accused of economic mistakes and removed from his post as chairman of the Council of Ministers. It was then that the supreme power in the country actually passed to Khrushchev, and he began to revise and revise the entire ideology of the USSR.
Often the question arises - why was there not a single person among the delegates of the XX Party Congress who would spit on Khrushchev’s face while reading his report “On the cult of personality”? Indeed, among the party leaders there were also the old Bolsheviks Vyacheslav Molotov and Lazar Kaganovich, who had gone through the school of revolutionary struggle, fought against the tsarism in the barricades. Molotov himself later in his memoirs said that he did not want a split in the party, civil conflict, so he did not appeal to the people, but hoped to remove Khrushchev from power by instrumental methods.
The potential for a popular uprising against the Khrushchevites was present. Khrushchev's gasping of Stalin's name was perceived as an insult in Georgia. Thousands of workers and students of various nationalities took to the streets of Tbilisi in March 1953. Eyewitnesses said that if Stalin's old ally Molotov called on them to speak out against the Khrushchevites, they would follow him. On the night of March 10, a rally of thousands went to the Communications House in Tbilisi to send a telegram to Molotov. The demonstrators were then shot by troops: the exact number of victims of that massacre is unknown - from 15, according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, to several hundred, according to eyewitnesses.
Events in Tbilisi, in fact, became the first link in a chain of popular unrest and performances that swept the country during the reign of Khrushchev (including the well-known events in Novocherkassk). But in all these unrest, the speakers did not have a clear understanding of what was happening, the Bolshevik leaders, the program and organization.
In 1957, the old Communists Molotov, Kaganovich, Malenkov, Voroshilov and “Shepilov who joined them” tried to implement the scenario of Khrushchev’s removal from power at a meeting of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee. But by this time Khrushchev had already placed his people everywhere in the party, enlisted the support of the generals, and his opponents themselves had been declared an “anti-party group” and removed from all posts. Khrushchevism triumphed completely.
The negative consequences of the Khrushchev report "On the cult of personality" were not slow to manifest themselves not only in the USSR, but also in other countries. In the countries of Eastern Europe, local "Khrushchevs" began to break into power - with the support of Moscow. The most bloody events occurred in 1956 in Hungary. There, the revisionists and outright counter-revolutionaries, inspired by the “changes” in the USSR, removed the head of the Hungarian Workers' Party M. Rakosi from the post, and then began terror against the Communists. On October 23, a fascist mob in Budapest broke a monument to Stalin. Events in Hungary already directly led to the fact that a neo-fascist regime could be established there, and the country itself - to move from the category of allies of the USSR to NATO. This forced the Soviet leadership to send troops to Hungary to restore order, after which local "Khrushchevites" were placed in power there.
The discrediting of the name of Stalin, the beginning of the undermining of socialist transformations in the USSR and Eastern Europe led to the outflow of people from communist parties around the world, to the creation of chaos in the minds of people who had previously firmly seen a beacon of progress in Moscow. So, during 1956, up to a third of its members left the Communist Party of Great Britain. The Communist Party of Great Britain after this never became mass.
The firm position of condemning the Khrushchev "coups" was taken by the Albanian Labor Party, headed by Enver Hoxna. The central newspaper of the Chinese Communists, the People’s Daily, in an editorial on the role of the individual in history, in April 1956 actually criticized the Khrushchev report, calling it "intentional falsification."
So Khrushchev's "report" laid the foundation for a split in the international communist movement, undermining its strength and unity.
Thirty years later, when the Gorbachevites launched “perestroika,” it was no coincidence that they began it with a new wave of defamation named after I.V. Stalin. They understood that in order to destroy the USSR they needed to discredit the period of building socialism, to convince the Soviet people that there was nothing bright and heroic there, but only terrible irrational “repressions”. In this they were helped by the ideological “weapon” that Khrushchev gave them.
Dar Vetrov
The destructive consequences of Khrushchev’s whistle dance are hard to overestimate. The campaign of discrediting Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, whose name is associated with the construction of socialism, industrialization and collectivization, the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, at the same time meant blackening the entire history of the Soviet Union and socialism in principle.
“Stalin is trampled in order to get close to Lenin. And some are already starting Lenin, ”stated Vyacheslav Molotov, one of the“ Stalinist ”leaders of the Soviet state, on the eve of Perestroika, shortly before his death.
“Not a single enemy brought as much trouble as Khrushchev brought to us with his policy regarding the past of our party and the state, as well as towards Stalin,” admitted former Khrushchev’s comrade-in-arms, Marshal Dmitry Ustinov.
Many contemporaries said that it was from the 20th Congress, from the report “On the Cult of the Personality,” that people began to lose faith in Soviet communist ideals, which were now replaced by confusion in their heads.
What motivated Nikita Khrushchev when he wrote the “report”, what goals did he pursue, dousing the heroic period of building socialism in the USSR? Researchers point out that Khrushchev had “personal accounts” with Stalin: his son Leonid was captured during the war, went over to the Germans, but was then captured by Soviet intelligence and shot. However, Khrushchev found many friends and accomplices, including in the leadership of the CPSU, and this is not only a matter of personal accounts.
V.I. Lenin and I.V. Stalin warned that the danger to socialism is not only open enemies, but also hidden - for the time being - enemies. Among them are people with the psychology of a petty landlord, a tradesman, a layman who are hostile to the great struggle and the great transformations that socialism brings with it. Among these inhabitants was the peasant son Nikita Khrushchev, who joined the Communists in 1918. These inhabitants, including those who crawled into the Communist Party, did not want reprisals, were afraid of the class struggle, their ideal of “socialism” came down to a “quiet”, “peaceful” course of life. Therefore, during the time of Khrushchev, it was announced that the dictatorship of the proletariat was abandoned and replaced with a “nation-wide state”, and the Leninist-Stalinist position on the continuation and intensification of the class struggle during the construction of socialism was subjected to defamation. Khrushchevtsev was even scared of the Stalinist plan for the transformation of nature, and it was curtailed. They were scared even by the majestic Stalinist architecture, and they adopted the infamous decree "On eliminating excesses in design and construction." Finally, the pygmies, having reached the heights of party power, simply could not help but give a damn about the grave of the giant Stalin.
Khrushchev, relying on his supporters, in 1953 achieved the arrest and murder of Marshal Lavrentiy Beria. But, and becoming the first secretary of the Central Committee, he still did not have all the full power - while George Malenkov remained the chairman of the Council of Ministers. Khrushchev engaged in hardware intrigues, in 1955 Malenkov was accused of economic mistakes and removed from his post as chairman of the Council of Ministers. It was then that the supreme power in the country actually passed to Khrushchev, and he began to revise and revise the entire ideology of the USSR.
Often the question arises - why was there not a single person among the delegates of the XX Party Congress who would spit on Khrushchev’s face while reading his report “On the cult of personality”? Indeed, among the party leaders there were also the old Bolsheviks Vyacheslav Molotov and Lazar Kaganovich, who had gone through the school of revolutionary struggle, fought against the tsarism in the barricades. Molotov himself later in his memoirs said that he did not want a split in the party, civil conflict, so he did not appeal to the people, but hoped to remove Khrushchev from power by instrumental methods.
The potential for a popular uprising against the Khrushchevites was present. Khrushchev's gasping of Stalin's name was perceived as an insult in Georgia. Thousands of workers and students of various nationalities took to the streets of Tbilisi in March 1953. Eyewitnesses said that if Stalin's old ally Molotov called on them to speak out against the Khrushchevites, they would follow him. On the night of March 10, a rally of thousands went to the Communications House in Tbilisi to send a telegram to Molotov. The demonstrators were then shot by troops: the exact number of victims of that massacre is unknown - from 15, according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, to several hundred, according to eyewitnesses.
Events in Tbilisi, in fact, became the first link in a chain of popular unrest and performances that swept the country during the reign of Khrushchev (including the well-known events in Novocherkassk). But in all these unrest, the speakers did not have a clear understanding of what was happening, the Bolshevik leaders, the program and organization.
In 1957, the old Communists Molotov, Kaganovich, Malenkov, Voroshilov and “Shepilov who joined them” tried to implement the scenario of Khrushchev’s removal from power at a meeting of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee. But by this time Khrushchev had already placed his people everywhere in the party, enlisted the support of the generals, and his opponents themselves had been declared an “anti-party group” and removed from all posts. Khrushchevism triumphed completely.
The negative consequences of the Khrushchev report "On the cult of personality" were not slow to manifest themselves not only in the USSR, but also in other countries. In the countries of Eastern Europe, local "Khrushchevs" began to break into power - with the support of Moscow. The most bloody events occurred in 1956 in Hungary. There, the revisionists and outright counter-revolutionaries, inspired by the “changes” in the USSR, removed the head of the Hungarian Workers' Party M. Rakosi from the post, and then began terror against the Communists. On October 23, a fascist mob in Budapest broke a monument to Stalin. Events in Hungary already directly led to the fact that a neo-fascist regime could be established there, and the country itself - to move from the category of allies of the USSR to NATO. This forced the Soviet leadership to send troops to Hungary to restore order, after which local "Khrushchevites" were placed in power there.
The discrediting of the name of Stalin, the beginning of the undermining of socialist transformations in the USSR and Eastern Europe led to the outflow of people from communist parties around the world, to the creation of chaos in the minds of people who had previously firmly seen a beacon of progress in Moscow. So, during 1956, up to a third of its members left the Communist Party of Great Britain. The Communist Party of Great Britain after this never became mass.
The firm position of condemning the Khrushchev "coups" was taken by the Albanian Labor Party, headed by Enver Hoxna. The central newspaper of the Chinese Communists, the People’s Daily, in an editorial on the role of the individual in history, in April 1956 actually criticized the Khrushchev report, calling it "intentional falsification."
So Khrushchev's "report" laid the foundation for a split in the international communist movement, undermining its strength and unity.
Thirty years later, when the Gorbachevites launched “perestroika,” it was no coincidence that they began it with a new wave of defamation named after I.V. Stalin. They understood that in order to destroy the USSR they needed to discredit the period of building socialism, to convince the Soviet people that there was nothing bright and heroic there, but only terrible irrational “repressions”. In this they were helped by the ideological “weapon” that Khrushchev gave them.
Dar Vetrov
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)