CAUTION! TROTSKISM!

Given the experience of death of the

CPSU and the collapse of the USSR, it is

really necessary to

understand and take this into account.



The beginning of the XXI century - the year of 2018 - is more and more clearly manifested in the minds of the working people, the ingenious foresight of J. V. Stalin, expressed by him in a conversation with Alexandra Kollontai: "New generations will grow and reestablish our due." Yes, interest in the activities of the Bolsheviks is growing. The ideas of Bolshevism are increasingly entering the minds of working people. For the main principles of Bolshevism are not ignored:

1. Public ownership of the means and instruments of production, natural wealth and land.

2. The dictatorship of the proletariat in the form of the Soviets of labor collectives.

3. Internationalism - the close and firm friendship of the peoples of the state.

Bolshevism is gaining momentum. However, it is impossible not to take into account the circumstance that is purposefully used by the leaders of a certain direction in their own vested interests. It is this direction that received the name of Trotskyism in the USSR, named after its inspirer, allegedly a communist, L. D. Trotsky (after Bronstein’s father).

Trotskyism was Trotsky’s ideological conviction, which he spread in March 1917, returning from the United States to Russia after the February Revolution. To do this, look at his memoir “My Life” (MF), first published in 1930. A similar name in history was already stated in Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” (“My Struggle”) published in 1925, and the readers of this the articles will agree with us that not only in the titles of the works there is a direct parallel, but also in the contents. Looking into the "MF", we find that Trotsky was the son of a large landowner in the south of Czarist Russia, who leased out land plots to small proprietors and thereby capitalized himself. That is, LD Trotsky is the bearer of the rural bourgeois ideology. Actually, Trotsky in the "MF" (vol. 1, pp. 120-126) quite frankly expounded the essence of the knowledge of the rural bourgeois. “At first, in conversations, I gave a decisive rebuff to socialist utopias. Marxism frightened, so-called narrowness. Burning with impatience, I wanted to, I tried to grasp ideas with my nose. But they were not so easy. I read newspapers. Through the "Russian News" I got the first insight into political life in Western Europe. Articles about Freemasonry in theological journals interested me. I started a notebook with a thousand numbered pages for Freemasonry and wrote excerpts from numerous books in small beads, alternating with my own thoughts about Freemasonry and the materialistic understanding of matter. ”“ The fact that I worked on Freemasonry, having a very limited number of political books , it has benefited me and was the basis for all my ideological development. ”

“Historical materialism was perceived by me immediately in dogmatic form (“ MF ”, vol. 1, pp. 140-148). The official or legal Marxism at that time (1896-1897), when I fought off the theory of Marxism, experienced a sharp crisis. Now I have already seen in living experience how unceremoniously new social needs create for themselves the ideological uniforms of theoretical cloth, intended for another purpose. The sharp knife of Marxism cut narodnichestvo,s umbilical cord. But as soon as Marx's theory fulfilled this task, it began to constrain the intelligentsia. European criticism of Marxism has now found a wide sale in Russia. My work on the history of Freemasonry sufficiently armed me in order to understand the service function of ideas in the historical process. ”

So, Trotsky, to his majority, clearly defined for himself the service function of ideas, firmly defined in Freemasonry, and not in Marxism. No wonder such a perception of the ideas of Freemasonry, because at the beginning of the XIX century, attempts to adapt Freemasonry for the needs of the revolution increased with a priority in the leadership of the Zionist leaders.



Having mastered freemasonry, at the beginning of the 20th century, Trotsky defined and loudly announced (what personal secretary of Grishka Rasputin Aaron Simanovich wrote in his memoirs about): “We must turn Russia into a desert inhabited by white slaves, whom we will give such a tyranny that weren’t dream of ever even by the most terrible despots of the East. We will show what real power is. We will bring the Russian intelligentsia to a complete stupidity, to idiocy, to an animal state. "

It was against the Trotskyists that the Bolshevik Party came up from October 1917, adopting the clause in the Party Charter: "... Recruitment according to the principles of cronyism, kinship, nepotism, friendship and friendship is incompatible with staying in the ranks of the party."

The mechanism of activity of Freemasonry is defined in the Catechism (Russkaya Pravda newspaper, No. 2, 1958, Tel Aviv): “Our nationalism is international. True internationalism is the only one that is primarily connected to Jewry, everything else is a provocation, a deception. Form your national cadres - this is the holy of holies. Each laboratory, each department, each institute must become the forge of our staff. For this, it is necessary to nominate young people as early as possible, proving their maturity and genius. ”

Guided and following these instructions, Trotsky LD (Bronstein), returning to Russia as early as July 1917, appealed to the Central Committee of the RSDLP (b) with a statement about the acceptance of the "Mezhrayontsev" of Petrograd in the Bolshevik Party. At the 6th congress of the RSDLP (b), they (there were 400 people) were “inter-district”, by a majority of two votes were accepted into the party. Lenin was not at this congress - he was hiding from the Provisional Government in a hut, he would not have allowed this, because by that time he had already determined that it was necessary to get rid of Freemasonry, which he warned in his letter to the congress of January 6, 1923. For already at the IV Congress of the Comintern in December 1922, demanded that members of the Communist parties of Western Europe leave the Masonic lodges. But it was precisely this addition to the letter that the CPSU party nomenclature (Gorbachev, in particular) did not read out anywhere and never.

The "Mezhrayontsy" of Petrograd accepted into the RSDLP (b) and filled the first Soviet Government - the Soviet of People's Commissars (SNK). In the first SNK, out of 456 members of the Government and its staff, 396 were inter-district people, that is, Freemasons. And in the future, where in the leadership of the organization turned out to be a Freemason, the team immediately became saturated with their people. Thus, the leadership of the Red Army was filled, because the Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council was Leonid Trotsky. By the 1930s, as we know, the top leaders of the Red Army conceived a military conspiracy against Soviet power, which Stalin had revealed and eliminated. The same picture emerged in the NKVD, which, under the leadership of Yezhov, launched the so-called “fist-mitts” in the Land of Soviets. But precisely J.V. Stalin stopped the flywheel of the Freemason Ezhovshchina. It is for this that the Freemasons of our days, beginning in 1953, slander J.V. Stalin.

Crimean Republican

organization of the AUCPB