A NEW WORLD OF STALIN

Speech by Secretary of the Central Committee Comrade S. Khristenko at the Plenum of the Central Committee of the AUCPB December 22, 2019

“We ourselves,  will build a New World”! What does this really mean? This means that everything that surrounds a person will change: state, national economy, study, education, upbringing, belief system, relationships between people, family, culture, science. And Stalin, during his leadership of the country, fully achieved success in this epoch-making work. It was difficult, neither Marx and Engels, nor even Lenin could “suggest” the answers to the endless questions that arise. Only one thing was clear, the goal was a steady movement towards communism.

The most important issue at that time was the fate of the socialist state as it moved forward towards communism. Comrade Stalin, summing up the analysis of Engels’s general formula on the conditions for the withering away of the state, he said that “... you cannot extend Engels’s general formula about the fate of a socialist state in general to a particular and concrete case of the victory of socialism in a single country, which has a capitalist environment around it, which is subject to the threat of a military attack from outside, which therefore cannot be distracted from the international situation, and which must have at its disposal a well-trained army, and well rganizovannye punitive organs, and strong intelligence, therefore, should have their fairly strong state - in order to be able to defend the conquests of Socialism from foreign attack. " All Soviet history fully confirmed the correctness of this approach.

Stalin has repeatedly said that there is Marxism and "Marxism." There is real Marxism — creative, Bolshevik and revolutionary Marxism, which in our time is Leninism. And there is another type of Marxism - "Marxism" in quotation marks, dogmatic Marxism, essentially alien to the revolutionary communist teachings of Marx - Lenin. Stalin showed himself as the largest representative of creative Marxism.

The question of the “world” revolution, in which, defending the ingenious Leninist position on the possibility of building socialism in a single country, Stalin had to withstand a fierce and prolonged struggle against the Trotskyists. The harsh reality of the early twenties showed: the German revolution lost, the Hungarian revolution lost, the Austrian revolution lost, even the little-known attempt of the Estonian revolution ended in failure in one day. Stalin clearly formulated an alternative - either we “break through” forward, in spite of any difficulties, here in our Soviet state, or all the achievements of the October Revolution will be lost. The implementation of the “breakthrough” is all the years of the Stalin era. Taking into account the victory of the Chinese revolution, the formation of the European socialist camp, the number of people living under socialism has increased several times, approaching half the size of humanity. This is Stalin’s answer to the question of the world revolution. Trotskyism was defeated also on the most important question of the attitude of the proletariat to the peasantry, of the role of the peasantry in the construction of socialism.

Stalin put forward a provision on the growth of tension in the struggle against anti-socialist forces as socialism was built. The enemies of socialism put forward an alternative statement: "socialism under construction has no enemies!" Accordingly, all the processes and repressions of the thirties were declared "far-fetched", "not based on anything," and Stalin was declared a tyrant. The "theory of the absence of enemies of the USSR" was widely distributed both in party decisions and in the Soviet media. As a vivid counterexample, I will cite the statement of the diplomat Davis, who was appointed US ambassador to the USSR in August 1936. “It is perfectly clear,” said Davis, “that all these processes, purges and liquidations, which at one time seemed so harsh, were part of the Stalin’s decisive and energetic efforts to protect themselves not only from insider coups, but also from outside attacks ... The purge brought order in the country and freed her from treason. ”

The question of the use of torture by the NKVD-KGB in 1937-1938 is important. "Democrats" widely used the argument about the mass character, actually totality, of this phenomenon. Documents testify to another. So, in a letter to Abakumov to Stalin and eyewitness testimony, it was said that physical influence on prisoners was permissible only with written sanction in special registration books, in the center with the sanction of the leadership of the Ministry of State Security of the USSR, and in the places with the sanction of the ministers of state security of the republics and the heads of regional and regional MGB Directorates. The question is, where are these registration books? The "democratic" history of our country today answers this question with complete silence, too much truth can come up with these books.

The events of the history of the USSR after the death of Stalin brought complete clarity to the question of “enemies of socialism”! They - the enemies - not only were, but eventually made their way to the party leadership, launched destructive successful work to destroy the USSR and socialism. The initiators of this struggle can be fullywith the right to attribute not only Nikita Khrushchev, but also Anastas Mikoyan. Here is his speech at the 20th Congress, and the fierce struggle with the principles of "Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR" and much more.

What can lead (and actually led) to the denial of the Stalinist experience of building a communist society prophetically written by Mao Zedong and Enver Hoxha in their Joint Statement “On the birthday of I.V. Stalin ”of December 21, 1964:“ The criminal actions of Khrushchev and his henchmen will have long-term consequences, they will lead to degeneration, and then to destruction of the USSR and the CPSU. Add to this the destruction of the world communist movement and the socialist camp to a tremendous extent.

Why did both internal enemies and external imperialist forces grab hold of the slander of the 20th Congress? Yes, because Stalin, the Stalinist system, embodied the communist dream in the real life of a multi-million dollar powerful country. The Soviet Union, which grew up after a victory in the Great Patriotic War into a powerful world power, posed a real mortal threat to world imperialism.

Counter-revolutionary forces within the country, imperialists outside, fiercely fight Stalin. But his authority in opinion polls is unprecedentedly high and is constantly growing. Unfortunately, only the Bolshevik forces are consistently and fiercely fighting to restore the authority of the great Stalin. We, all Bolsheviks, should clearly understand that the struggle for Stalin is one of our most important tasks.