On the day
The protracted reform to raise the retirement age in the Russian Federation stumbled upon sharp criticism from the population. And the last word, as it is customary to say in such cases, remained for the first person of Russia. The expectations were great, since President Putin V.V. made over the past six months a lot of statements in which he saw the way out of the crisis in a significant increase in labor productivity. Which no one disputed.
Actually, for Russia it is not news how to increase labor productivity, for, relying on the postwar experience of the Soviet Union, one can recall an instructive example of increasing labor productivity immediately after the victory over fascist Germany in 1945. Then the country of the first of the victor countries abolished the ration cards in 1947 and showed a vivid example of how to work and raise the standard of living of the population ... Although our allies did not suffer such great losses in human and economic terms as the USSR, they were able to abolished their ration coupon only in 1951.
We must not forget that the Soviet Union soon experienced an atomic bomb in 1949 and declared about nuclear parity in the world. And then the rocket was launched into space, which demonstrated the creation of the entire nuclear missile shield of the country. Of course, such economic successes are unlikely to have succeeded if in the Soviet Union words were voiced about increasing labor productivity. Although we can not forget that the words about the rapid construction of communism soon after the creation of the nuclear missile shield of the country poured out, as from a cornucopia, but it was already said by people who openly embarked on the collapse of the country. Therefore, politicians from N. Khrushchev to M. Gorbachev can not be compared here. Here it is necessary to be equal to the experience of the country in the war years, when output for the front and for victory grew every day. After all, the retirement age of 55 years for women and 60 years for men was taken by the military generation that won the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.
Of course, one can not help noticing that there was a vivid discussion in the State Duma of this pension reform, in which three non-governmental factions criticized the authorities for not doing anything to raise taxes on big business, whose profits are striking in the face of their abyss-the gap between the incomes of the richest 10% of the population and the poorest 10%. V. Putin only said that it is useless to raise the tax and do it in 20%, since these payments for pensioners will last for 6 days ... But after all, the conversation was about the incomes of the oligarchs much more significant, and therefore it would not be a sin to rip them. Then payments could be for pensioners much longer than 6 days ...
Therefore, returning to the speech of V.Putin on August 29, 2018, most of all I remember the words that now "we have to overcome the consequences of the shocks of the 90s". But after all, on the basis of these shocks, the Russian oligarchy was created, which now lives and does nicely out of it and, of course, offers no suggestions on mitigating the pension reform. In this sense, Putin only demonstrated complete solidarity with the oligarchs and essentially pulled them closer to his body.
Of course, V. Putin "forgot" in his address to the people of the Russian Federation to recollect statements in favor of raising labor productivity, insofar as the population of the Russian Federation has a deep historical experience. One gets the impression that the Russian president is making statements on this part, but what he really does not know about the productivity of labor. It turns out that again "everything is decided by the market", the sanctions on which threaten every day to overturn the delicate balance that has been established recently. But opposition economists in this market are predicting the inevitable collapse of the ruble. Then it certainly will not be up to pensioners ...
In our opinion, in order to improve the well-being of the entire population, and not just retirees, we must abandon the criminal liberal economic course pursued by the government of D. Medvedev. But V. Putin will never go for it ... That is why the issue of improving the life of pensioners by implementing the pension reform proposed by the current government of the Russian Federation for any of its crafty embellishments remains UNSOLVABLE ...
Economic Observer of the Central Committee of the AUCPB
Saturday, September 8, 2018
Monday, September 3, 2018
27 years ago the counterrevolution was realized in the USSR
Russian President Vladimir Putin described the events of August 1991 as an attempt at a coup, Lenta.ru reported May 22. 27 years ago Putin worked for the mayor of Leningrad A. Sobchak, who was on the side of Yeltsin. And at the same time he, being a lieutenant colonel of the KGB, was subordinate to V. Kryuchkov, who was a member of the State Committee for Emergency Situation (State Emergency Committee). Putin noted that he decided to stay with Sobchak, so as not to "rush back and forth." "And therefore, in this situation, the most correct thing for me is to write a report and resign, to which he [Sobchak] said to me:" OK, then do it. "I'll call Kryuchkov." The head of state added that the mayor really called and the report was signed.
The AUCPB calls the events of August 1991 not an attempt, but a real political coup, which was carried out by provocation with the State Emergency Committee. As a result of this provocation, the authorities concentrated on the supporters of the counter-revolution. From the May interview of the President of the Russian Federation, we can conclude that the Yeltsinists already considered acting the power of themselves, and no one else. Playing a performance for television cameras, the corrupt officials of the Gorbachev Soviet Union portrayed the confrontation between the republican and allied authorities, but at the same time calmly solved personnel issues through personal phone calls. Let's remember this.
And what is GKChP? We are often told that this is a group of comrades who fought for the preservation of the USSR. But in August 1991, that USSR could no longer be preserved, its foundation was already destroyed by the "parade of sovereignties" and the law "On Property", back in 1990. In 1990, private property was legalized in the USSR and in the union republics, which led to the complete re-establishment of capitalism in the country. Property and power passed into the hands of the "new Russians", neo-bourgeoisie, and most of the officials of the USSR and the CPSU also went over to their side to preserve power and their privileges.
The putch GKChP put the entire Soviet Union before a false dichotomy (bifurcation). "Either you are for Yeltsin, or for Gorbachev!" - was inspired throughout the RSFSR. Gorbachevshchina for 6 years was fed up with everything. But the alternative was advancing local anti-Soviet authorities. This is so - in fact in 1991 the authorities of the republics of the USSR practically all worked against the USSR. Then the heads of the Soviet republics will become presidents of the CIS countries. This is about each such president, the phrase: "So he, crafty, paid a lot for the prettiest ! Himself wanted to reign and everything to own?!"
So, in 1991 the counterrevolutionaries finally seized power. In Russia they were Yeltsinists. They gained strength from the Gorbachevists, from the very beginning of Perestroika, and Yeltsin appeared in their chapter only at the end to become a bright charismatic alternative. Then everyone saw what kind of alternative it was! And then people were taught that there are only two centers of power, Gorbachevites and Yeltsinists. But both of them were counterrevolutionaries. They were all against socialism and for capitalism, and the disagreements between them were only in the one to whom that will be given in the division of power and property.
The power and property initially did not belong to Gorbachev's partocrats or Yeltsin's nouveau riche - all this was given to them free of charge, free of charge, from grandfathers and great-grandfathers who committed the Great October Socialist Revolution. The counterrevolutionaries spent 6 years brainwashing all the inhabitants of the USSR. Water and media were poured onto their mill (all the main editors obeyed A.N. Yakovlev!), And the cinema (remember S. Govorukhin's agitation "Can not Live Like That"?), And music (remember I. Talkov?).
And the Soviet people, in their mass, could not put up resistance to such an information war against them. When, from August 18 to 21, 1991, the State Emergency Committee organized a coup, the Soviet Union reasoned that it was "Moscow showdowns" and simply waited, whose will take. Tsarila was a petty-bourgeois philistine psychology: "my hut is from the outskirts." It still reigns in our society. It still keeps many people from social and political struggle.
And "satisfied" and "dissatisfied" like bread and spectacles. Then, in 1991, there was a spectacle. Yeltsin on the tank banned the activities of the Emergency Committee in Russia, and all the media exploded: look, the people are against communism, and the people's leader is ahead in the tank! Well, we already know the consequences.
Comrades! Do not believe liars from the media! In 2011, they returned to the old policy, and for 7 years they have been persuading us to choose either Putin or Navalny. This is the same false choice as "Yeltsin or Gorbachev," "Russia or the West." Do not choose between two evils! Choose a socialist revolution!
All that was won by our great-grandfathers in 1917-1920, which was saved by our grandfathers in 1941-1945, turned out to be in the hands of a handful of officials in 1991. From 1991 to 2018, around the anti-Soviet power grew and strengthened the class of owners - the bourgeoisie. In their private property - our land, water, mineral wealth, forests, plants, transportation, communications. It was for this purpose that privatization and "shock therapy" were conducted, so that from the laboring people could be taken away as much as possible. But if the power is again in the hands of the working people, then they will be able to regain all thier wealth!
Long live the re-creation of our Soviet homeland!
Ivan Kotran, Kuibyshev organization of the AUCPB
On the events of August 1991
N.A. Andreeva
In the second half of 1991, Gorbachev's perestroika crawled into a crisis. Capital, eager for political power, no longer suited the socialist phraseology of Gorby. The social democratic, chameleon way of restoring capitalism has exhausted its "perestroika" capabilities. Before Gorbachev's political bosses, the question arose about replacing this road with a radically authoritarian one, capable of giving a second wind to bourgeois reformism. This was also demanded by the regrouping of forces in the economically dominant bourgeoisie. The question arose: how to modernize the restoration process? The agency of the bourgeoisie, thirsting for power, comes to the rescue. It provokes the need to introduce a state of emergency, for the requirement of establishing an elementary order in the country has become universal.
The essence of the provocation in August 1991 was that, in addition to the President of the USSR, resting in Foros, he imposed a state of emergency on the initiative of the chekachepists (Yanaev, Yazov, Kryuchkov, Lukyanov, Pavlov and others). When the state of emergency was announced, Gorbachev's announcement was immediately followed by Gorbachev's "Foros Prisoner", accusations of loyal fellow chelators in the seizure of power, a coup d'état and even a "military coup" ... Of course, there was no coup in Moscow, not even with taking into account three "ritual sacrifices", specially organized by Yeltsinists. The counter-revolution simply overthrew all the first deputies of Gorbachev. The result of this provocation was the tragedy of hundreds of millions of workers who were ripped out of the remnants of power, the Constitution of the USSR was trampled undermined, the prestige of the Soviet Armed Forces and state security agencies was undermined and the activities of the CPSU were soon banned.
The direct consequence of the bourgeois political coup in August 1991 was two events.
First. The counter-revolution went beyond the Soviet Union. At the 20th Congress of the CPSU, Khrushchev argued that the socialist revolution should not be exported to neighboring countries. Khrushchev's heirs-Gorbachevites through the USSR carried out the export of the bourgeois counter-revolution to the Eastern European countries of socialism. The participation of the Gorbachevites determined the face of the "velvet revolutions" in Europe and the alignment of political forces in the former socialist states. The result: the weakening of the world socialist system, the deterioration of the situation in the international communist movement and the sharp change in the balance of forces in the international arena in favor of imperialism. This is one of the international aspects of the temporary victory of the bourgeois counter-revolution in the USSR.
The second. The natural result of the August coup was the Belovezhsky conspiracy of the presidents of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. This unconstitutional criminal conspiracy disorganized the Soviet Union into "sovereign" states, which are now becoming a raw material appendage of international capital and the dependent countries of the "third world". At the same time, the results of the All-Union referendum on March 17, 1991, at which 76% of the participants voted for a single Soviet Union were brazenly ignored. The Belovezhsky collusion deprived the Soviet people of its great homeland, and the world community - a country that was the vector and beacon of social progress. Violation of the existing balance and bipolarity of the world objectively leads to an increase in the threat of a third world war.
Such is the tragic national aspect of the bourgeois counter-revolution in the USSR.
(from the Collection of Selected Articles and N.A. Andreeva's speeches "For Bolshevism inside the Communist Movement", Leningrad, 1995, pp. 35-36)
In the second half of 1991, Gorbachev's perestroika crawled into a crisis. Capital, eager for political power, no longer suited the socialist phraseology of Gorby. The social democratic, chameleon way of restoring capitalism has exhausted its "perestroika" capabilities. Before Gorbachev's political bosses, the question arose about replacing this road with a radically authoritarian one, capable of giving a second wind to bourgeois reformism. This was also demanded by the regrouping of forces in the economically dominant bourgeoisie. The question arose: how to modernize the restoration process? The agency of the bourgeoisie, thirsting for power, comes to the rescue. It provokes the need to introduce a state of emergency, for the requirement of establishing an elementary order in the country has become universal.
The essence of the provocation in August 1991 was that, in addition to the President of the USSR, resting in Foros, he imposed a state of emergency on the initiative of the chekachepists (Yanaev, Yazov, Kryuchkov, Lukyanov, Pavlov and others). When the state of emergency was announced, Gorbachev's announcement was immediately followed by Gorbachev's "Foros Prisoner", accusations of loyal fellow chelators in the seizure of power, a coup d'état and even a "military coup" ... Of course, there was no coup in Moscow, not even with taking into account three "ritual sacrifices", specially organized by Yeltsinists. The counter-revolution simply overthrew all the first deputies of Gorbachev. The result of this provocation was the tragedy of hundreds of millions of workers who were ripped out of the remnants of power, the Constitution of the USSR was trampled undermined, the prestige of the Soviet Armed Forces and state security agencies was undermined and the activities of the CPSU were soon banned.
The direct consequence of the bourgeois political coup in August 1991 was two events.
First. The counter-revolution went beyond the Soviet Union. At the 20th Congress of the CPSU, Khrushchev argued that the socialist revolution should not be exported to neighboring countries. Khrushchev's heirs-Gorbachevites through the USSR carried out the export of the bourgeois counter-revolution to the Eastern European countries of socialism. The participation of the Gorbachevites determined the face of the "velvet revolutions" in Europe and the alignment of political forces in the former socialist states. The result: the weakening of the world socialist system, the deterioration of the situation in the international communist movement and the sharp change in the balance of forces in the international arena in favor of imperialism. This is one of the international aspects of the temporary victory of the bourgeois counter-revolution in the USSR.
The second. The natural result of the August coup was the Belovezhsky conspiracy of the presidents of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. This unconstitutional criminal conspiracy disorganized the Soviet Union into "sovereign" states, which are now becoming a raw material appendage of international capital and the dependent countries of the "third world". At the same time, the results of the All-Union referendum on March 17, 1991, at which 76% of the participants voted for a single Soviet Union were brazenly ignored. The Belovezhsky collusion deprived the Soviet people of its great homeland, and the world community - a country that was the vector and beacon of social progress. Violation of the existing balance and bipolarity of the world objectively leads to an increase in the threat of a third world war.
Such is the tragic national aspect of the bourgeois counter-revolution in the USSR.
(from the Collection of Selected Articles and N.A. Andreeva's speeches "For Bolshevism inside the Communist Movement", Leningrad, 1995, pp. 35-36)
Thursday, August 23, 2018
August 15, the DPRK celebrates National Liberation Day
Triumphal Victory Arch in the center of Pyongyang
The struggle of the Korean people with the Japanese regular military units during the occupation of Korea lasted almost half a century, was very difficult and unequal. The Japanese army was well supplied with both provisions and all the necessary military equipment. Partisan detachments created by the Great Leader, Comrade Kim Il Sung, and led by him, obtained weapons for themselves in armed attacks on Japanese military units, and the guerrillas were supplied by local residents who fully supported the partisan detachment.
The best military fort, on which the KPRA (the Korean People's Revolutionary Army) relied in its struggle against the Japanese, was the region of the mountains of Paektu. It represented an unassailable fortress, created by nature itself, favorable for the defense of the revolutionary army and unfavorable for enemy attacks. This area of Korea was also characterized by strong anti-Japanese sentiments of the population. The Paektusan partisan camp was a reliable mass base of the revolution. From here Kim Il Sung organized raid operations on the territory of Korea by large forces.
In December 1938, in an unprecedented frost, practically without food, sleep and rest, leaving the encirclement, the KPRA fighters had to make a forced march that lasted 100 days. This campaign, carried out under the command of Kim Il Sung, entered the history of the anti-Japanese struggle under the name "Arduous March".
August 8, 1945 the Soviet Union, fulfilling the commitments adopted at the Tehran and Yalta conferences, announced the state of war with Japan. On the night of August 8 to August 1.5 million, the Soviet (Red) army dealt a crushing blow to Japan's land forces.
On August 9, commander Kim Il Sung ordered all the detachments of the KNRA to order a general offensive. Detachments of the KPRA fought against the opposing individual groups of the Kwantung Army. As a result, the 1 million Kwantung Army was completely defeated. On August 14, a meeting of the government and the high command of the army and navy was convened in the bomb shelter of the emperor of Japan, in which, contrary to military opposition, the emperor proposed the draft of his rescript on the unconditional surrender of the Japanese armed forces on the terms of the Potsdam Declaration.
Day of August 15 in Korea was celebrated as the National Liberation Day.
Liberation from the Japanese yoke became the starting event in the formation of the socialist state in 1948.
Created by the Great Leader, Comrade Kim Il Sung, the DPRK today is a developed self-sufficient state, equipped for its defense and defense with its own nuclear weapons.
Despite constant encroachments by the imperialist US on the independence and very existence of the DPRK, the people of the country are confidently looking to the future, celebrating on September 9 the 70th anniversary of the formation of their socialist state.
Congratulating the people of the DPRK on the 73rd anniversary of National Independence, we wish successes in defending your borders from the mad imperialist United States, which can not in any way reconcile itself to the very fact of the existence of a socialist state in northeast Asia.
We believe in the victory of the Korean working people under the leadership of their leader, Comrade Kim Jong-un.
We wish our Korean friends to continue bearing high the victorious banner of the Juche idea in the storming of the heights of the construction of a prosperous socialist state.
Central Committee of the AUCPB
Statement of the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the AUCPB on the issue of unilateral denuclearization of the DPRK
The Central Committee of the AUCPB in its Statement of June 15 this year, on the assessment of the adopted Agreement at the meeting in Singapore of the leader of the DPRK, Comrade Kim Jong-un, with US President Donald Trump, expressed its extreme concern about the demand in the Agreement for unilateral nuclear disarmament by the DPRK without the US commitment to withdraw the previously strangled countries in the DPRK sanctions.
The validity of our distrust of President Trump's sincerity at the meeting in Singapore confirmed the August messages of the US State Department to Pyongyang with the proposal of exactly unilateral disarmament of the DPRK without lifting any sanctions imposed on the DPRK earlier. Moreover, at the same time, an attempt was made to drag through the UN Security Council a resolution on imposing new sanctions on the DPRK and sanctions on one of the Russian companies "noticed" in cooperation with the DPRK.
This policy of the US State Department has confirmed the previously expressed distrust of US proposals for the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and our assessment of the US position as a deceit of the world community by Trump's indefinite lengthy statements.
Against the backdrop of the bill recently passed by the US Senate in 2019 for an unprecedented military budget of $ 716 billion (thereby threatening the entire world, the US Senate), the liquidation of its nuclear missile and nuclear capabilities at the present time would be a frank suicide.
The AUCPB supports and approves the categorical answer "NO" by the leader of the DPRK, Comrade Kim Jong-un, who described the US Department of State's proposals as "gangster", which they really are.
We support the demand of Comrade Kim Jong-un about the permanent lifting of all sanctions against the DPRK and the conclusion of the DPRK-US peace treaty.
We support the DPRK's defense nuclear policy, which pursues the sole goal of preserving its state from the manic desire of the United States to finally destroy the DPRK through unilateral denuclearization, which the United States had not previously been able to achieve either in the DPRK's Fatherland Liberation War of 1950-1953 or in all subsequent years by imposing endlessly suffocating sanctions on the country.
We wish the heroic people of the DPRK to withstand this fierce battle with the imperialist predator of the USA, distraught from permissiveness and successfully continue building its socialist state. We wish the DPRK success in strengthening its nuclear component in the defense of the country.
We firmly believe in the victory of the DPRK.
N.A Andreeva
General Secretary of the AUCPB
August 14, 2018
The validity of our distrust of President Trump's sincerity at the meeting in Singapore confirmed the August messages of the US State Department to Pyongyang with the proposal of exactly unilateral disarmament of the DPRK without lifting any sanctions imposed on the DPRK earlier. Moreover, at the same time, an attempt was made to drag through the UN Security Council a resolution on imposing new sanctions on the DPRK and sanctions on one of the Russian companies "noticed" in cooperation with the DPRK.
This policy of the US State Department has confirmed the previously expressed distrust of US proposals for the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and our assessment of the US position as a deceit of the world community by Trump's indefinite lengthy statements.
Against the backdrop of the bill recently passed by the US Senate in 2019 for an unprecedented military budget of $ 716 billion (thereby threatening the entire world, the US Senate), the liquidation of its nuclear missile and nuclear capabilities at the present time would be a frank suicide.
The AUCPB supports and approves the categorical answer "NO" by the leader of the DPRK, Comrade Kim Jong-un, who described the US Department of State's proposals as "gangster", which they really are.
We support the demand of Comrade Kim Jong-un about the permanent lifting of all sanctions against the DPRK and the conclusion of the DPRK-US peace treaty.
We support the DPRK's defense nuclear policy, which pursues the sole goal of preserving its state from the manic desire of the United States to finally destroy the DPRK through unilateral denuclearization, which the United States had not previously been able to achieve either in the DPRK's Fatherland Liberation War of 1950-1953 or in all subsequent years by imposing endlessly suffocating sanctions on the country.
We wish the heroic people of the DPRK to withstand this fierce battle with the imperialist predator of the USA, distraught from permissiveness and successfully continue building its socialist state. We wish the DPRK success in strengthening its nuclear component in the defense of the country.
We firmly believe in the victory of the DPRK.
N.A Andreeva
General Secretary of the AUCPB
August 14, 2018
Wednesday, August 15, 2018
Fidel: the struggle continues
On August 13, 2018, Fidel Castro, organizer and leader of the Cuban Revolution, could have turned 92 years old. For two years now, since there is no Cuban leader with us - his life ended in 2016 - but his cause is alive. It lives like revolutionary Cuba is alive, despite the US blockade and attempts by the imperialists to disintegrate the country from within.
"I started the revolution with 82 people. If I had to repeat this, I would have had fifteen or even ten. Ten people and absolute faith. It does not matter how many of you. It is important to believe and it is important to have a clear plan. Victory is persistence "
At a young age, having embarked on the path of struggle against the dictatorship, Fidel did not bow before the authority of "traditional" opposition leaders, but began organizing young people. Fidel had to reject the convenience of ordinary people, change them to prison, emigration and partisan life in the mountains. Next to him were his like-minded people - brother Raul Castro, comrade Camilo Cienfuegos, Argentinian native Ernesto Che Guevara, who joined the revolutionary struggle of the Cubans, and other comrades.
"The revolution is not a bed of roses. Revolution is a battle between the future and the past "
The future is not built in parliamentary halls, but in the midst of the people - it was firmly known to the Cuban revolutionaries. The struggle for socialism is not going to the ballot boxes every few years, not flapping the flag in time with the monotonous muttering of bonz from the "parties of moderate progress within the framework of legality." The revolution demands renunciation of petty-bourgeois life, contempt for the "philosophy of wise minnows," afraid of "whatever happens." The revolution requires readiness for personal self-sacrifice, the revolutionary loves his people, but is uncompromising and merciless toward enemies.
Castro knew perfectly well that dictator Batista's regime would not go away on his own. Fidel did not adapt to life under the dictatorship, did not wait for the regime to transform into something more "soft", and embarked on the path of his revolutionary overthrow. Counter-revolutionary violence must be countered with revolutionary violence. And this concerns not only the period of the struggle for power, but also the period of the establishment of people's power and the building of socialism.
"I remember very well how, after the collapse of the USSR, many people attacked me with advice to do all the dirty tricks that all the others did. I'm going to some meeting, for example, inauguration, there are always going to certain personalities ..., other Latin American figures came - all with advice for me, how to act, so that Cuba could survive ... I listened with great respect, discussed it the way I had it meaning to discuss the issue, and remained unshakable".
And after the collapse of the USSR - a great friend and ally of Cuba - Fidel Castro and his associates were not scared, did not surrender to the US and new "friends", but retained the socialist system. Some maneuvers have been done, concessions have been made on some issues, one can argue about the admissibility of which, but Cuba remained the Island of Freedom, despite the storms that fought against its shores.
The case of Fidel Castro to some extent remains incomplete. This is primarily due to the international situation - it is not easy to create a new system when you have an enemy like the US, and those who are stuffed into "friends" are also thinking about how to "pinch off" a piece of the country's resources. Neither does the counter-revolution supported by the North Americans keep slumbering. This means that the Cuban revolution still has to fight.
The future revolutionary generations will have to bear the banner of Fidel in the future.
Dar Vetrov
Extension of the Atomic Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan
The DPRK Committee for Peace in the APR exposed the background of the extension of the Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan
Pyongyang, August 5 / CTAC / - The Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan for 30 years has expired automatically, which expired on July 16. In this regard, the DPRK Committee for Peace in the Asia-Pacific Region published a White Paper on August 4, exposing a dangerous intention and a criminal nature on the background of the silent intrigues of prolonging this Agreement between the United States and the Japanese reactionaries.
The White Paper notes the following.
Historically, the Japanese reactionaries kept saying that Japan, as the only state in the world that suffered from a nuclear catastrophe, is categorically against the possession and use of nuclear weapons.
However, contrary to their words, the Japanese reactionaries had long been harboring the infamous plan for nuclear weapons and were striving for its implementation.
Japan, which since the early 1930s conducted a study of the use of nuclear energy, since the 1940s, under the direct leadership of the military department, until recently, comprehensively promoted the development of the atomic bomb.
And in 1956, Japan began to implement the technology of nuclear fuel reprocessing, in 1977, the production of plutonium began, and in the 1980s a fast neutron reactor called Mondju was used to mass the plutonium.
Also in 1988, after the conclusion of the Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan, Japan began to import spent nuclear fuel from other countries, and sought to accumulate plutonium.
The White Paper also highlights the US double position, which keeps silent about Japan's intention to develop nuclear technology in order to obtain nuclear weapons.
Japan, except for five permanent members of the UN Security Council, is the only country in the world that is allowed to produce plutonium through the utilization of nuclear fuel.
After in 1988 the United States granted Japan the right to recycle spent nuclear fuel, Japanese reactionaries in the past 30 years have increased the accumulation of plutonium for nuclear weapons.
Already in the mid-1950s, the United States, through the "Marshall Plan of Atomic Energy", transferred Japan the basic technologies for the development of nuclear weapons, including uranium enrichment technology, and in the late 1960s, under the pretext of testing, supplied Japan with 365 kg of weapons-grade plutonium.
It was the Ford administration that in 1976 agreed to Japan for the construction of a plant for the utilization of nuclear fuel, and the Carter administration in 1977 hinted Japan that using plutonium for a nuclear reactor it is possible to manufacture nuclear weapons.
The conclusion of the Atomic Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan in July 1988 allowed Japan to extract plutonium and enrich uranium by disposing of spent nuclear fuel.
In fact, it's like initiating Japanese reactionaries plotting to carry out their own nuclear weapons.
The White Paper states that Japan's nuclear weapons and the subsequent global nuclear catastrophe are a matter of time.
Until now, the world's accumulated amount of plutonium has reached 518 tons, while the quantity stored in Japan reaches 47 tons.
Despite this, the United States and the Japanese reactionaries again openly committed an anti-human and trampling crime, automatically extending the Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan.
This of course without unnecessary words is the result of collusion between the island's gangs and the United States. The Japanese are also trying to turn their country into a military power under the active aegis, indulgence and encouragement of the master and thereby fulfill the former dream of "the sphere of co-prosperity of great East Asia", while the United States is "exclusively generous" in the hands of a vassal and use it as a shock strike for the implementation of the strategy of domination over Asia.
If the US has the will to denuclearize the Korean peninsula, then, of course, they should be called into question about the nuclear weapons of Japan and objectively assess the state of affairs.
Japan must realize that its "frivolous" behavior only breeds isolation in the international community and accelerates self-destruction. Japan should act cautiously.
Foreign Minister of the DPRK made a speech at the meeting of the Ministers of the ASEAN Regional Forum
Pyongyang, August 5 / Foreign Minister Lee Yong-Ho on August 4 delivered a speech at a meeting of ASEAN regional forum ministers held in Singapore.
He stated that the summit and negotiations held in Singapore, for the first time in the history of relations between the DPRK and the US, are an important event that had the most profound and positive impact on the development of the situation in the APR.
He also pointed out that if those countries that are in deep-seated hostile relations achieve mutual trust, then it is possible to solve the issue of peace and security in the region and the world through dialogue and negotiations.
This is a huge international significance, which has a summit and negotiations in Singapore.
The position of our Republic is unchanged: to actively develop the relations of friendship and cooperation with all countries in the region on the basis of respect for sovereignty, equality and mutual favor and continuously contribute to joint efforts to build confidence and implement preventive diplomacy of the ASEAN Regional Forum.
The new state of peace and stability achieved on the Korean Peninsula is the expensive sprouts that all countries of the region should jointly promote, cherish and consolidate for the stable and constructive development of the APR situation as a whole.
In short, the current situation on the Korean peninsula can be called a moment of history, in which the old is destroyed and a new one is born.
Last June, it was here on the island of Sentosa that the leaders of the DPRK and the US reached an age-old agreement.
The determination and stance of the DPRK is unshakable and responsibly and with diligence to implement the joint statement of the DPRK and the United States.
The main key that guarantees the full implementation of the joint statement of the DPRK and the United States is the creation of trust.
Trust is not a feeling that arises one morning. To fully build trust between the DPRK and the United States, simultaneous action from both sides is necessarily necessary, a step-by-step method is needed for possible and next execution.
First of all, create trust, and carry out all the articles of the joint statement proportionally, simultaneously and in stages - only this new method is the only real way to success, as we are sure.
It is when the United States allows us to approach them without alarm, and we too can open the soul of the United States and show our attitude by action.
This is the main core of the spirit of the agreement reached by the heads of the two countries of the DPRK and the United States.
But the alarming fact is that inside the US, unlike the intentions of its leadership, there are still attempts to turn back to the old.
We can not allow that a joint statement by the DPRK and the US will serve as a victim of US domestic policy and thereby a contrary wind will blow against the intentions of the heads of both countries.
We were determined to take some measures, respectively, if the US side arrives with constructive proposals. But while the US does not show its firm readiness, which allows us to eradicate our anxiety. Therefore, we will not act unilaterally first.
The Korean proverb says: "a lazy gait, but a cowhide." And so for the implementation of the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, the fastest, most accurate and closest way is to gently build confidence through a phased and synchronous action gradually.
The DPRK last April chose a new strategic line - to concentrate all forces on economic construction.
If in our country the economy is restored and the standard of living of the population is raised, then it will only benefit the world and security, economic growth in the whole region, and not harm.
The international community should, as appropriate, respond with constructive measures that inspire and encourage the peace and economic development of the Korean peninsula to the first goodwill measures that we have undertaken to denuclearize.
In conclusion, the Foreign Minister of the DPRK expressed hope and confidence that all the participating countries of the ASEAN Regional Forum cherished the hard-won century-old chance of turning the situation on the Korean peninsula and did things that would benefit the cardinal solution of the Korean Peninsula issue.
Pyongyang, August 5 / CTAC / - The Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan for 30 years has expired automatically, which expired on July 16. In this regard, the DPRK Committee for Peace in the Asia-Pacific Region published a White Paper on August 4, exposing a dangerous intention and a criminal nature on the background of the silent intrigues of prolonging this Agreement between the United States and the Japanese reactionaries.
The White Paper notes the following.
Historically, the Japanese reactionaries kept saying that Japan, as the only state in the world that suffered from a nuclear catastrophe, is categorically against the possession and use of nuclear weapons.
However, contrary to their words, the Japanese reactionaries had long been harboring the infamous plan for nuclear weapons and were striving for its implementation.
Japan, which since the early 1930s conducted a study of the use of nuclear energy, since the 1940s, under the direct leadership of the military department, until recently, comprehensively promoted the development of the atomic bomb.
And in 1956, Japan began to implement the technology of nuclear fuel reprocessing, in 1977, the production of plutonium began, and in the 1980s a fast neutron reactor called Mondju was used to mass the plutonium.
Also in 1988, after the conclusion of the Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan, Japan began to import spent nuclear fuel from other countries, and sought to accumulate plutonium.
The White Paper also highlights the US double position, which keeps silent about Japan's intention to develop nuclear technology in order to obtain nuclear weapons.
Japan, except for five permanent members of the UN Security Council, is the only country in the world that is allowed to produce plutonium through the utilization of nuclear fuel.
After in 1988 the United States granted Japan the right to recycle spent nuclear fuel, Japanese reactionaries in the past 30 years have increased the accumulation of plutonium for nuclear weapons.
Already in the mid-1950s, the United States, through the "Marshall Plan of Atomic Energy", transferred Japan the basic technologies for the development of nuclear weapons, including uranium enrichment technology, and in the late 1960s, under the pretext of testing, supplied Japan with 365 kg of weapons-grade plutonium.
It was the Ford administration that in 1976 agreed to Japan for the construction of a plant for the utilization of nuclear fuel, and the Carter administration in 1977 hinted Japan that using plutonium for a nuclear reactor it is possible to manufacture nuclear weapons.
The conclusion of the Atomic Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan in July 1988 allowed Japan to extract plutonium and enrich uranium by disposing of spent nuclear fuel.
In fact, it's like initiating Japanese reactionaries plotting to carry out their own nuclear weapons.
The White Paper states that Japan's nuclear weapons and the subsequent global nuclear catastrophe are a matter of time.
Until now, the world's accumulated amount of plutonium has reached 518 tons, while the quantity stored in Japan reaches 47 tons.
Despite this, the United States and the Japanese reactionaries again openly committed an anti-human and trampling crime, automatically extending the Nuclear Energy Agreement between the United States and Japan.
This of course without unnecessary words is the result of collusion between the island's gangs and the United States. The Japanese are also trying to turn their country into a military power under the active aegis, indulgence and encouragement of the master and thereby fulfill the former dream of "the sphere of co-prosperity of great East Asia", while the United States is "exclusively generous" in the hands of a vassal and use it as a shock strike for the implementation of the strategy of domination over Asia.
If the US has the will to denuclearize the Korean peninsula, then, of course, they should be called into question about the nuclear weapons of Japan and objectively assess the state of affairs.
Japan must realize that its "frivolous" behavior only breeds isolation in the international community and accelerates self-destruction. Japan should act cautiously.
Foreign Minister of the DPRK made a speech at the meeting of the Ministers of the ASEAN Regional Forum
Pyongyang, August 5 / Foreign Minister Lee Yong-Ho on August 4 delivered a speech at a meeting of ASEAN regional forum ministers held in Singapore.
He stated that the summit and negotiations held in Singapore, for the first time in the history of relations between the DPRK and the US, are an important event that had the most profound and positive impact on the development of the situation in the APR.
He also pointed out that if those countries that are in deep-seated hostile relations achieve mutual trust, then it is possible to solve the issue of peace and security in the region and the world through dialogue and negotiations.
This is a huge international significance, which has a summit and negotiations in Singapore.
The position of our Republic is unchanged: to actively develop the relations of friendship and cooperation with all countries in the region on the basis of respect for sovereignty, equality and mutual favor and continuously contribute to joint efforts to build confidence and implement preventive diplomacy of the ASEAN Regional Forum.
The new state of peace and stability achieved on the Korean Peninsula is the expensive sprouts that all countries of the region should jointly promote, cherish and consolidate for the stable and constructive development of the APR situation as a whole.
In short, the current situation on the Korean peninsula can be called a moment of history, in which the old is destroyed and a new one is born.
Last June, it was here on the island of Sentosa that the leaders of the DPRK and the US reached an age-old agreement.
The determination and stance of the DPRK is unshakable and responsibly and with diligence to implement the joint statement of the DPRK and the United States.
The main key that guarantees the full implementation of the joint statement of the DPRK and the United States is the creation of trust.
Trust is not a feeling that arises one morning. To fully build trust between the DPRK and the United States, simultaneous action from both sides is necessarily necessary, a step-by-step method is needed for possible and next execution.
First of all, create trust, and carry out all the articles of the joint statement proportionally, simultaneously and in stages - only this new method is the only real way to success, as we are sure.
It is when the United States allows us to approach them without alarm, and we too can open the soul of the United States and show our attitude by action.
This is the main core of the spirit of the agreement reached by the heads of the two countries of the DPRK and the United States.
But the alarming fact is that inside the US, unlike the intentions of its leadership, there are still attempts to turn back to the old.
We can not allow that a joint statement by the DPRK and the US will serve as a victim of US domestic policy and thereby a contrary wind will blow against the intentions of the heads of both countries.
We were determined to take some measures, respectively, if the US side arrives with constructive proposals. But while the US does not show its firm readiness, which allows us to eradicate our anxiety. Therefore, we will not act unilaterally first.
The Korean proverb says: "a lazy gait, but a cowhide." And so for the implementation of the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, the fastest, most accurate and closest way is to gently build confidence through a phased and synchronous action gradually.
The DPRK last April chose a new strategic line - to concentrate all forces on economic construction.
If in our country the economy is restored and the standard of living of the population is raised, then it will only benefit the world and security, economic growth in the whole region, and not harm.
The international community should, as appropriate, respond with constructive measures that inspire and encourage the peace and economic development of the Korean peninsula to the first goodwill measures that we have undertaken to denuclearize.
In conclusion, the Foreign Minister of the DPRK expressed hope and confidence that all the participating countries of the ASEAN Regional Forum cherished the hard-won century-old chance of turning the situation on the Korean peninsula and did things that would benefit the cardinal solution of the Korean Peninsula issue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)